Development of Prostate Bed Delineation Consensus Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiotherapy and Assessment of Its Effect on Interobserver Variability.

PURPOSE: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiotherapy planning is becoming more widespread, particularly with the emergence of MRI-guided radiotherapy systems. Existing guidelines for defining the prostate bed clinical target volume (CTV) show considerable heterogeneity. This study aimed to establish baseline interobserver variability (IOV) for prostate bed CTV contouring on MRI, develop international consensus guidelines, and evaluate its effect on IOV. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Participants delineated the CTV on 3 MRI scans, obtained from the Elekta Unity MR-Linac, as per their normal practice. Radiation oncologist contours were visually examined for discrepancies, and interobserver comparisons were evaluated against simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) contours using overlap metrics (Dice similarity coefficient and Cohen's kappa), distance metrics (mean distance to agreement and Hausdorff distance), and volume measurements. A literature review of postradical prostatectomy local recurrence patterns was performed and presented alongside IOV results to the participants. Consensus guidelines were collectively constructed, and IOV assessment was repeated using these guidelines. RESULTS: Sixteen radiation oncologists' contours were included in the final analysis. Visual evaluation demonstrated significant differences in the superior, inferior, and anterior borders. Baseline IOV assessment indicated moderate agreement for the overlap metrics while volume and distance metrics demonstrated greater variability. Consensus for optimal prostate bed CTV boundaries was established during a virtual meeting. After guideline development, a decrease in IOV was observed. The maximum volume ratio decreased from 4.7 to 3.1 and volume coefficient of variation reduced from 40% to 34%. The mean Dice similarity coefficient rose from 0.72 to 0.75 and the mean distance to agreement decreased from 3.63 to 2.95 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver variability in prostate bed contouring exists among international genitourinary experts, although this is lower than previously reported. Consensus guidelines for MRI-based prostate bed contouring have been developed, and this has resulted in an improvement in contouring concordance. However, IOV persists and strategies such as an education program, development of a contouring atlas, and further refinement of the guidelines may lead to additional improvements.

Prostate volume variation during 1.5T MR-guided adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and correlation with treatment toxicity.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate prostate volume change during daily-adaptive prostate SBRT on 1.5 T MR-linac and to correlate it with treatment toxicity. METHODS: a series of patients affected by low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer was treated by 5-fraction SBRT within a prospective study (Prot. n° 23748). Total dose was 35 Gy and 36.25 Gy delivered every day or on alternate days. Treatment toxicity was recorded with the following patient reported outcomes (PROMs): IPSS, ICIQ-SF, and EPIC-26. RESULTS: 254 patients were included in the analysis. Baseline median CTV volume was 55 cc (range 15.3-163.3). Mean prostate volume were 58.9 cc, and 62.7 cc at first and last fraction respectively (mean volume increase 6.4 %; p = <0.0001). We observed prostate swelling (mean 15.4 % increase) in 50 % of cases, stable volume (≤5% volume change) in 39 % of patients, and prostate shrinkage in 11 % of cases (mean 12.2 % reduction). Baseline CTV > 55 cc showed a trend towards higher CTV shrinkage (-10.5 % versus -14.5 %; p = 0.052). We found no correlation between CTV change and PROMs. Prostate swelling was generally compensated by the planned PTV expansion, even though the mean setup volume dropped from 47.4 cc to 38.9 cc at last fraction, with few cases not covered by initial setup margins. CONCLUSION: The present study reported a significant prostate volume change during prostate SBRT on 1.5T MR-linac. We observed both prostate swelling in half of cases and few cases of prostate shrinkage. No correlations were found with PROMs in this population treatment with daily-adaptive strategy.

PSMA-PET/CT-Based Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Non-Spinal Bone Oligometastases from Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has a consolidated role in the treatment of bone oligometastases from prostate cancer (PCa). While the evidence for spinal oligometastases SBRT was robust, its role in non-spinal-bone metastases (NSBM) is not standardized. In fact, there was no clear consensus about dose and target definition in this setting. The aim of our study was to evaluate efficacy, toxicity, and the pattern of relapse in SBRT delivered to NSBM from PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2016 to 2021, we treated a series of oligo-NSBM from PCa with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-guided SBRT. The primary endpoint was local progression-free survival (LPFS). The secondary endpoints were toxicity, the pattern of intraosseous relapse, distant progression-free survival (DPFS), polimetastases-free survival (PMFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: a total of 150 NSBM in 95 patients were treated with 30-35 Gy in five fractions. With a median follow-up of 26 months, 1- and 3 years LPFS was 96.3% and 89%, respectively. A biologically effective dose (BED) ≥ 198 Gy was correlated with improved LPFS (p = 0.007). Intraosseous relapse occurred in eight (5.3%) cases. Oligorecurrent disease was associated with a better PMFS compared to de novo oligometastatic disease (p = 0.001) and oligoprogressive patients (p = 0.007). No grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred. CONCLUSION: SBRT is a safe and effective tool for NSBM from PCa in the oligometastatic setting. Intraosseous relapse was a relatively rare event. Predictive factors of the improved outcomes were defined.

Linac-based versus MR-guided SBRT for localized prostate cancer: a comparative evaluation of acute tolerability.

AIM: This study aims to compare acute toxicity of prostate cancer (PCa) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered by MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) with 1.5-T MR-linac or by volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) with conventional linac. METHODS: Patients with low-to-favorable intermediate risk class PCa were treated with exclusive SBRT (35 Gy in five fractions). Patients treated with MRgRT were enrolled in an Ethical Committee (EC) approved trial (Prot. n° 23,748), while patients treated with conventional linac were enrolled in an EC approved phase II trial (n° SBRT PROG112CESC). The primary end-point was the acute toxicity. Patients were included in the analysis if they had at least 6 months of follow-up for the primary end-point evaluation. Toxicity assessment was performed according to CTCAE v5.0 scale. International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 135 patients were included in the analysis. Seventy-two (53.3%) were treated with MR-linac and 63 (46.7%) with conventional linac. The median initial PSA before RT was 6.1 ng/ml (range 0.49-19). Globally, acute G1, G2, and G3 toxicity occurred in 39 (28.8%), 20 (14.5%), and 5 (3.7%) patients. At the univariate analysis, acute G1 toxicity did not differ between MR-linac and conventional linac (26.4% versus 31.8%), as well as G2 toxicity (12.5% versus 17.5%; p = 0.52). Acute G2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity occurred in 7% and 12.5% of cases in MR-linac and conventional linac group, respectively (p = 0.06), while acute G2 genitourinary toxicity occurred in 11% and 12.8% in MR-linac and conventional linac, respectively (p = 0.82). The median IPSS before and after SBRT was 3 (1-16) and 5 (1-18). Acute G3 toxicity occurred in two cases in the MR-linac and three cases in the conventional linac group (p = n.s.). CONCLUSION: Prostate SBRT with 1.5-T MR-linac is feasible and safe. Compared to conventional linac, MRgRT might to potentially reduce the overall G1 acute toxicity at 6 months, and seems to show a trend toward a lower incidence of grade 2 GI toxicity. A longer follow-up is necessary to assess the late efficacy and toxicity.

A predictive model of polymetastatic disease from a multicenter large retrospectIve database on colorectal lung metastases treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: The RED LaIT-SABR study.

Aim: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) showed increasing survival in oligometastatic patients. Few studies actually depicted oligometastatic disease (OMD) evolution and which patient will remain disease-free and which will rapidly develop a polymetastatic disease (PMD) after SABR. Therefore, apart from the number of active metastases, there are no clues on which proven factor should be considered for prescribing local treatment in OMD. The study aims to identify predictive factors of polymetastatic evolution in lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer patients. Methods: This international Ethical Committee approved trial (Prot. Negrar 2019-ZT) involved 23 Centers and 450 lung oligometastatic patients. Primary end-point was time to the polymetastatic conversion (tPMC). Additionally, oligometastases number and cumulative gross tumor volume (cumGTV) were used as combined predictive factors of tPMC. Oligometastases number was stratified as 1, 2-3, and 4-5; cumGTV was dichotomized to the value of 10 cc. Results: The median tPMC in the overall population was 26 months. Population was classified in the following tPMC risk classes: low-risk (1-3 oligometastases and cumGTV ≤ 10 cc) with median tPMC of 35.1 months; intermediate-risk (1-3 oligometastases and cumGTV > 10 cc), with median tPMC of 13.9 months, and high-risk (4-5 oligometastases, any cumGTV) with median tPMC of 9.4 months (p = 0.000). Conclusion: The present study identified predictive factors of polymetastatic evolution after SABR in lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer. The results demonstrated that the sole metastases number is not sufficient to define the OMD since patients defined oligometastatic from a numerical point of view might rapidly progress to PMD when the cumulative tumor volume is high. A tailored approach in SABR prescription should be pursued considering the expected disease evolution after SABR, with the aim to avoid unnecessary treatment and toxicity in those at high risk of polymetastatic spread, and maximize local treatment in those with a favorable disease evolution.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for a Rare Case of Sinonasal Metastasis Arising from Renal Cell Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Sinonasal metastases arising from renal cell cancer are rare and usually managed with surgery. Few studies describe the use of radiotherapy in this specific setting, while the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been rarely reported as well. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a solitary left sinonasal metastasis in a 65-year-old man with clear cell renal cancer who also received bilateral nephrectomy and subsequent kidney transplantation. The patient received subtotal surgery and subsequently he was candidate to SBRT to avoid systemic treatment, due to renal comorbidities. CONCLUSION: The patient was treated with SBRT for a total dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions and after 24 months of follow-up there is no evidence of local relapse. No major side-effects were reported. Our experience supports SBRT as a safe and feasible treatment option in the case of sinonasal metastases from RCC.

1.5T MR-Guided Daily-Adaptive SBRT for Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Report of Toxicity and Quality of Life of the First 100 Patients.

Purpose: The present study reports the preliminary outcomes in terms of adverse events and quality of life in the first 100 patients treated with 1.5T MR-guided daily-adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Methods: From October 2019 to December 2020, 100 patients, enrolled in a prospective study, received MR-guided SBRT for prostate cancer. Rectal spacer insertion was optional and administered in 37 patients. In total, 32 patients received androgen deprivation therapy in accordance with international guidelines. A prospective collection of data regarding toxicity and quality of life was performed. Results: The median age was 71 years (range, 52-84). The median total dose delivered was 35 Gy (35-36.25 Gy) in five sessions, either on alternate days (n = 25) or consecutive days (n = 75). For acute toxicity, we recorded: seven cases of acute G2 urinary pain and four cases of G2 gastrointestinal events. The median follow-up was 12 months (3-20), recording three late G2 urinary events and one G3 case, consisting of a patient who required a TURP 8 months after the treatment. For gastrointestinal toxicity, we observed 3 G ≥ 2 GI events, including one patient who received argon laser therapy for radiation-induced proctitis. Up to the last follow-up, all patients are alive and with no evidence of biochemical relapse, except for an M1 low-volume patient in distant progression two months after radiotherapy. QoL evaluation reported a substantial resolution of any discomfort within the second follow-up after radiotherapy, with the only exception being sexual items. Notably, after one year, global health items were improved compared to the baseline assessment. Conclusions: This study reports very promising outcomes in terms of adverse events and QoL, supporting the role of 1.5T MR-guided SBRT for prostate cancer. To date, this series is one of the first and largest available in the literature. Long-term results are warranted.

1.5 T MR-Guided Daily Adapted SBRT on Lymph Node Oligometastases from Prostate Cancer.

Introduction: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a daily adaptive MR-guided SBRT on 1.5 T MR-linac in patients affected by lymph node oligometastases from PCa. Materials and Methods: The present study is a prospective observational study conducted in a single institution (protocol n°: MRI/LINAC n. 23748). Patients with oligometastatic lymph nodes from PCa treated with daily adaptive MR-guided SBRT on 1.5 T MR-linac were included in the study. There was a minimum required follow-up of 3 months after SBRT. The primary end-point was local progression-free survival (LPFS). The secondary end-points were: nodal progression-free survival (NPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Results: A total of 118 lymph node oligometastases from PCa were treated with daily adaptive 1.5 T MR-guided SBRT in 63 oligometastatic patients. Of the patients, 63.5% were oligorecurrent and 36.5% were oligoprogressive. The two-year LPFS was 90.7%. The median NPFS was 22.3 months and the 2-year NPFS was 46.5%. Receiving hormone therapy before SBRT was correlated with a lower NPFS at the multivariate analysis (1 y NPFS 87.1% versus 42.8%; p = 0.002-HR 0.199, 95% CI 0.073-0.549). Furthermore, the oligorecurrent state during ADT was correlated with a lower NPFS than was the oligoprogressive state. The median PFS was 10.3 months and the 2-year PFS was 32.4%. Patients treated with hormone therapy before SBRT had a significantly lower 1-year PFS the others (28% versus 70.4%; p = 0.01-HR 0.259, 95% CI 0.117-0.574). No acute and late toxicities occurred during treatment. Conclusions: The present study is the largest prospective study of 1.5 T lymph node SBRT on MR-linac in patients with PCa. Lymph node SBRT by 1.5 T MR-linac provides high local control rates with an excellent toxicity profile.

Hypofractionated Postoperative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer with Ialuril Soft Gels®: Toxicity and Efficacy Analysis on a Retrospective Series of 305 Patients.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of Ialuril soft Gels® (HA) in reducing acute genito-urinary (GU) toxicity in patients treated with adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy for a prostate cancer relapse. Material and Methods: The data of 305 patients were retrospectively collected. One hundred and five patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT), while 200 a salvage treatment (sRT). GU toxicity was evaluated according to CTCAE v5.0. Every patient received RT combined with HA. Results: Grade 1-2 GU toxicity during RT was represented by: urgency (36%), dysuria (23%), increased urinary frequency (12.1%), and urinary retention (11.8%). Nevertheless, the majority of symptoms were present at the baseline. Grade 3 severe toxicity was represented by 10 (3.2%) cases of incontinence and 3 (1%) cases of urgency. The incidence of any-grade RT-related GU toxicity was significantly higher in the aRT group than the salvage group (esRT + sRT) (83.8% versus 64.5%). When comparing the incidence of any-grade RT-related GU toxicity in the aRT, esRT, and sRT groups we observed a significant correlation favoring sRT, over esRT, and aRT. Conclusion: Postoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy is safe and not correlated with increase of unexpected toxicity when administered with oral hyaluronic acid. A prospective study is necessary to confirm these results.

1.5T MR-Guided Daily Adaptive Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Re-Irradiation: A Preliminary Report of Toxicity and Clinical Outcomes.

Background: Prostate re-irradiation is an attractive treatment option in the case of local relapse after previous radiotherapy, either in the definitive or in the post-operative setting. In this scenario, the introduction of MR-linacs may represent a helpful tool to improve the accuracy and precision of the treatment. Methods: This study reports the preliminary data of a cohort of 22 patients treated with 1.5T MR-Linacs for prostate or prostate bed re-irradiation. Toxicity was prospectively assessed and collected according to CTCAE v5.0. Survival endpoints were measured using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: From October 2019 to October 2021, 22 patients received 1.5T MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate or prostate-bed re-irradiation. In 12 cases SBRT was delivered to the prostate, in 10 to the prostate bed. The median time to re-RT was 72 months (range, 12-1460). SBRT was delivered concurrently with ADT in 4 cases. Acute toxicity was: for GU G1 in 11/22 and G2 in 4/22; for GI G1 in 7/22, G2 in 4/22. With a median follow-up of 8 months (3-21), late G1 and G2 GU events were respectively 11/22 and 4/22. Regarding GI toxicity, G1 were 6/22, while G2 3/22. No acute/late G≥3 GI/GU events occurred. All patients are alive. The median PSA-nadir was 0.49 ng/ml (0.08-5.26 ng/ml), for 1-year BRFS and DPFS rates of 85.9%. Twenty patients remained free from ADT with 1-year ADT-free survival rates of 91.3%. Conclusions: Our experience supports the use of MR-linacs for prostate or prostate bed re-irradiation as a feasible and safe treatment option with minimal toxicity and encouraging results in terms of clinical outcomes.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for pulmonary oligometastases: a monoinstitutional analysis of clinical outcomes and potential prognostic factors.

PURPOSE: We report the retrospective data of a cohort of patients who received stereotactic body radiotherapy for pulmonary oligometastases, aiming to assess the clinical factors potentially affecting clinical outcomes. METHODS: The present series reports the outcomes of a cohort of 71 patients with pulmonary oligometastases with no extrapulmonary disease. All patients were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) performed with volumetric modulated arc therapy-image guided radiotherapy (VMAT-IGRT) to up to five secondary lesions. Survival estimates were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 98 lesions in 71 patients were treated from February 2014 to August 2020. The most frequent histologies were colorectal in 37.7%, lung cancer in 44.8%, head and neck cancer in 8.1%, and other in 9.4%. Median age was 71 years (range 32-93 years). Concurrent systemic therapy was administered in 32.3%. SBRT was delivered to a median total dose of 60 Gy (range 55-70 Gy) in 3-10 fractions for a median BED10 = 105 Gy (range 96-180 Gy). Median follow-up was 29.5 months (range 6-81), with no acute or late G > 2 adverse event. Our LC rates at 2 and 4 years were 92.4 and 89.8%, respectively. DPFS rates at 2 and 4 years were 45.3 and 27.2%, respectively. A second SBRT course was proposed in 21 patients (29.5%) who developed an oligoprogression, resulting in median time to second progression of 9 months (range 2-44) and 2­year PFS2 rate of 42.4%. At univariate analysis, patients with sequential oligometastases reported better OS rates (p = 0.002), which was also confirmed at multivariate analysis, where distant progression was also related to worse OS (p = 0.022). Higher local control rates relate to better PFS (p = 0.04). The 2­ and 4­year OS rates were 61 and 39.7% CONCLUSION: SBRT is feasible for pulmonary oligometastases with favorable outcomes and toxicity. At multivariate analysis, patients with sequential oligometastatic progression maintain a survival advantage. Also, local control was found to be related to improved PFS rates.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and concomitant systemic therapy in oligoprogressive breast cancer patients.

Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease with a deep tailoring level. Evidence is accumulating on the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the management of oligometastatic disease, however this is limited in breast cancer. The aim of the present study is to show the effectiveness of SBRT in delaying the switch to a subsequent systemic treatment in oligoprogressive breast cancer patients. Retrospective analysis from two Institutions. Primary endpoint: time to next systemic treatment (NEST). Secondary endpoints: freedom from local progression (FLP), time to the polymetastatic conversion (tPMC) and overall survival (OS). One-hundred fifty-three (153) metastases in 79 oligoprogressive breast cancer patients were treated with SBRT. Median follow-up 24 months. Median NEST 8 months. Predictive factor of NEST at the multivariate analysis (MVA) was the number of treated oligometastases (HR 1.765, 95%CI 1.322-2.355; p = < 0.01). Systemic treatment after SBRT was changed in 29 patients for polymetastatic progression and in 10 patients for oligometastatic progression < 6 months after SBRT. The 2-year FLP in the overall population was 86.7%. A biological effective dose (BED) > 70Gy10 was associated with improved FLP (90% versus 74.2%). The median tPMC was 10 months. At the MVA the only factors significantly associated with tPMC were the number of oligometastases (HR 1.172, 95%CI 1.000-1.368; p = 0.03), and the local control of the treated metastases (HR 2.726, CI95% 1.108-6.706; p = 0.02). SBRT can delay the switch to a subsequent systemic treatment, however patient selection is necessary. Several predictive factors for treatment tailoring have been identified.

Postoperative moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a mono-institutional propensity-score-matching analysis between adjuvant and early-salvage radiotherapy.

AIM: To evaluate the impact of moderately hypofractionated postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 304 surgically resected PCa patients were analyzed. One hundred and five patients underwent adjuvant RT (aRT), 77 early-savage RT (esRT), and 123 salvage RT (sRT). Biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to account for potential confounders between aRT and esRT groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 33 months. Three-year BRFS and PFS were 82 and 85.2%, respectively, in the overall population. At the multivariate analysis, Gleason score and hormone therapy were factors independently correlated with BRFS and PFS. After PSM, there was no difference in BRFS and PFS between aRT and esRT patients. Severe toxicity was represented by grade 3 urinary incontinence (3.5%) and urgency (1%), and aRT correlated with increased any-grade acute toxicity. Severe grade 3 gastrointestinal late toxicity occurred in 1.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: Postoperative moderately hypofractionated RT achieved acceptable disease control rate and demonstrated no increased or unexpected toxicity. Future prospective studies should evaluate the role of postoperative RT in patients with unfavorable disease characteristics.

Automated Planning for Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on the 1.5 T MR-Linac.

PURPOSE: Adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer (PC) by the 1.5 T MR-linac currently requires online planning by an expert user. A fully automated and user-independent solution to adaptive planning (mCycle) of PC-SBRT was compared with user's plans for the 1.5 T MR-linac. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty adapted plans on daily magnetic resonance imaging scans for 10 patients with PC treated by 35 Gy (prescription dose [Dp]) in 5 fractions were reoptimized offline from scratch, both by an expert planner (manual) and by mCycle. Manual plans consisted of multicriterial optimization (MCO) of the fluence map plus manual tweaking in segmentation, whereas in mCycle plans, the objectives were sequentially optimized by MCO according to an a-priori assigned priority list. The main criteria for planning approval were a dose ≥95% of the Dp to at least 95% of the planning target volume (PTV), V33.2 (PTV) ≥ 95%, a dose less than the Dp to the hottest cubic centimeter (V35 ≤ 1 cm3) of rectum, bladder, penile bulb, and urethral planning risk volume (ie, urethra plus 3 mm isotropically), and V32 ≤ 5%, V28 ≤ 10%, and V18 ≤ 35% to the rectum. Such dose-volume metrics, plus some efficiency and deliverability metrics, were used for the comparison of mCycle versus manual plans. RESULTS: mCycle plans improved target dose coverage, with V33.2 (PTV) passing on average (±1 SD) from 95.7% (±1.0%) for manual plans to 97.5% (±1.3%) for mCycle plans (P < .001), and rectal dose sparing, with significantly reduced V32, V28, and V18 (P ≤ .004). Although at an equivalent number of segments, mCycle plans consumed moderately more monitor units (+17%) and delivery time (+9%) (P < .001), whereas they were generally faster (-19%) in terms of optimization times (P < .019). No significant differences were found for the passing rates of locally normalized γ (3 mm, 3%) (P = .059) and γ (2 mm, 2%) (P = .432) deliverability metrics. CONCLUSIONS: In the offline setting, mCycle proved to be a trustable solution for automated planning of PC-SBRT on the 1.5 T MR-linac. mCycle integration in the online workflow will free the user from the challenging online-optimization task.

Reduction of inter-observer differences in the delineation of the target in spinal metastases SBRT using an automatic contouring dedicated system.

BACKGROUND: Approximately one third of cancer patients will develop spinal metastases, that can be associated with back pain, neurological symptoms and deterioration in performance status. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have been offered in clinical practice mainly for the management of oligometastatic and oligoprogressive patients, allowing the prescription of high total dose delivered in one or few sessions to small target volumes, minimizing the dose exposure of normal tissues. Due to the high delivered doses and the proximity of critical organs at risk (OAR) such as the spinal cord, the correct definition of the treatment volume becomes even more important in SBRT treatment, thus making it necessary to standardize the method of target definition and contouring, through the adoption of specific guidelines and specific automatic contouring tools. An automatic target contouring system for spine SBRT is useful to reduce inter-observer differences in target definition. In this study, an automatic contouring tool was evaluated. METHODS: Simulation CT scans and MRI data of 20 patients with spinal metastases were evaluated. To evaluate the advantage of the automatic target contouring tool (Elements SmartBrush Spine), which uses the identification of different densities within the target vertebra, we evaluated the agreement of the contours of 20 spinal target (2 cervical, 9 dorsal and 9 lumbar column), outlined by three independent observers using the automatic tool compared to the contours obtained manually, and measured by DICE similarity coefficient. RESULTS: The agreement of GTV contours outlined by independent operators was superior with the use of the automatic contour tool compared to manually outlined contours (mean DICE coefficient 0.75 vs 0.57, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: The dedicated contouring tool allows greater precision and reduction of inter-observer differences in the delineation of the target in SBRT spines. Thus, the evaluated system could be useful in the setting of spinal SBRT to reduce uncertainties of contouring increasing the level of precision on target delivered doses.

SBRT for elderly oligometastatic patients as a feasible, safe and effective treatment opportunity.

The constantly increasing life expectancy is raising the issue of treating oncological older patients, who were traditionally candidates to best supportive care or palliative treatments. Several literature data support SBRT in the treatment of the oligometastatic patient as a potentially curable therapeutic option. However, data on older patients are lacking. This study presents the outcomes of a cohort of 61 oligometastatic patients over the age of 80 years who received SBRT, that was proposed to all patients with a minimum Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70 and a life expectancy of at least 6 months, with up to five oligometastatic lesions. Radiotherapy was delivered in 3-10 fractions with VMAT-IGRT technique. Toxicity was retrospectively collected according to CTCAE v4.0. Data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed for assessing any potential predictive factor for clinical outcomes. A total of 90 oligometastases were treated in 61 patients with median age 82 years (range, 80-90). The most frequent histology was colorectal cancer (27% of cases). Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 2-63). Local control rates at 1- and 2-years were 98.8% and 88.2%, with colorectal histology being associated with worse LC rates (p = 0.014) at univariate analysis. Progression-free survival rates at 1- and 2-years were 48.6% and 30.5%. Oligorecurrent lesions and single oligometastases were associated with better PFS rates (respectively, p = 0.04 and p = 0.011). Overall survival rates were 75% and 60.5%, polymetastatic spread being predictive of worse survival outcomes at multivariate analysis (p = 0.012). No G2 or higher adverse events were recorded. Our study supports the role of SBRT for the treatment of elderly oligometastatic patients, highlighting the possibility to further explore this therapeutic option in the management of older oncological patients.

Patient positioning and immobilization procedures for hybrid MR-Linac systems.

Hybrid magnetic resonance (MR)-guided linear accelerators represent a new horizon in the field of radiation oncology. By harnessing the favorable combination of on-board MR-imaging with the possibility to daily recalculate the treatment plan based on real-time anatomy, the accuracy in target and organs-at-risk identification is expected to be improved, with the aim to provide the best tailored treatment. To date, two main MR-linac hybrid machines are available, Elekta Unity and Viewray MRIdian. Of note, compared to conventional linacs, these devices raise practical issues due to the positioning phase for the need to include the coil in the immobilization procedure and in order to perform the best reproducible positioning, also in light of the potentially longer treatment time. Given the relative novelty of this technology, there are few literature data regarding the procedures and the workflows for patient positioning and immobilization for MR-guided daily adaptive radiotherapy. In the present narrative review, we resume the currently available literature and provide an overview of the positioning and setup procedures for all the anatomical districts for hybrid MR-linac systems.

The use of SBRT in the management of oligometastatic gynecological cancer: report of promising results in terms of tolerability and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The use of stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligometastases is supported by several literature studies, but in the setting of gynecological malignancies, this scenario remains quite unexplored. This study reports a preliminary assessment of clinical outcomes in a cohort of 40 patients with oligometastatic gynecological neoplasms. METHODS: Radiotherapy was delivered in 3-10 fractions with VMAT-IGRT technique. Toxicity was retrospectively collected according to CTCAE v4.0. Data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for assessing any potential predictive factor for clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 63 oligometastases were treated from December 2014 to February 2021. Median age was 63 years (range 30-89). Most frequent primary tumors were ovarian cancer in 42.5% and endometrium cancer in 42.5%. With a median follow-up of 27 months (range 6-69), no local failures were observed, our progression-free survival rates were 43.6% and 23% at one and 2 years, respectively, while 1 and 2-year overall survival rates were both 70%. No acute or late G ≥ 2 adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, SBRT for oligometastatic gynecological malignancies resulted in promising results in terms of clinical outcomes, with excellent local control and no evidence of severe toxicity, highlighting the effectiveness of this therapeutic option. Prospective studies to further explore this approach in this setting are advocated.