RESUMEN
A large proportion of prescriptions for extensively hydrolyzed cow's milk protein (CMP) in newborns are not based on any scientific data justifying the indication. Many of these prescriptions are old habits or are based on incomplete data. The aim of this article is to analyze these practices and propose recommendations. The following points are covered: (a) indications for extensively hydrolyzed formula based on studies demonstrating their benefits in these situations-newborns with a proven allergy to CMP and occasional prescription of supplements to breastfeeding; (b) possible indications not based on a high level of evidence-re-initiation of feeding due to necrotizing enterocolitis, short bowel syndrome, re-initiation of feeding of newborns following intestinal surgery, and laparoschisis if neither the mother's own milk nor milk from a lactarium is available; (c) unjustified indications-newborns at risk of atopy, prematurity, severe neurological pathologies, newborns who are hemodynamically unstable and/or have congenital cardiopathy, neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy treated with hypothermia, and newborns with esophageal atresia or diaphragmatic hernia. By following this classification, the prescriber will be guided to use the milk best suited to the pathology, bearing in mind that each situation must be adapted individually and the tolerance and effectiveness of the food reassessed from a nutritional and functional point of view.
RESUMEN
Perinatal exposure to pollutants, including persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and heavy metals, poses significant risks to both mothers and children, marking this period as highly vulnerable. Despite the well-acknowledged benefits of breastfeeding, there exists a gap in comprehensive understanding regarding the impact of environmental pollutants on breast milk, underscoring the critical need for this study. Our research addresses this gap by exploring the intersection of environmental health and lactation, situated within the broader 'One Health' concept, thus contributing a novel perspective to the existing body of knowledge. This scoping review aims to examine recent research on the persistent presence of organic pollutants (POPs) and heavy metals in breast milk, thereby elucidating the environmental setting's impact on milk quality. We seek to highlight the innovative angle of our study by emphasizing the 'One Health' concept, which has not been thoroughly explored in the context of lactation and environmental pollutants. We performed a scoping review, consulting two online databases to identify articles published from 1995 to 2023 that reported on pollutants in breast milk, using the PRISMA checklist. This methodological approach underlines the comprehensive and up-to-date nature of our literature review, ensuring the relevance and timeliness of our findings. From a total of 54 relevant articles, findings indicate that POPs are present in higher concentrations in breast milk the longer the lactation period. These findings highlight the persistent and bioaccumulative nature of such contaminants, offering new insights into their long-term implications for maternal and infant health. This exposure does not appear time-sensitive, suggesting pollutants accumulated in maternal fat compartments can be excreted into human milk years after exposure, a novel finding that underscores the importance of considering long-term environmental exposures in lactation research. The presence of POPs and heavy metals in both infant formula and maternal milk underscores a critical need for further comparative studies to understand the health implications better. Our discussion extends the current dialogue on the safety of breastfeeding in polluted environments, providing a new framework for assessing risks and benefits. While breastfeeding remains the WHO-recommended nutrition for optimal infant growth, the findings emphasize the importance of continued risk reduction policies to protect mothers and infants from environmental contaminants in breast milk. Our conclusion calls for an integrated approach, combining public health, environmental science, and clinical practice to develop effective strategies for reducing exposure to environmental pollutants. This multidisciplinary perspective is a significant contribution to the field, paving the way for future research and policy development.