From Restricted Resources to Ethical Burden-Former Home Care Workers' Reasons for Leaving Their Jobs.

The study examines former home care workers' reasons for leaving their jobs from the perspective of reforms in public services and eldercare policies impacted by New Public Management (NPM) in Finland. Written narratives from former home care workers (n = 39) were collected online and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Former home care workers' reasons for leaving their jobs were connected to four interconnecting themes: mismatch between needs and resources, measurement-driven practices, unbalancing work-life, and ethical burden. These reasons reflected critical changes in the organization of care work and the work environment in older adults' home care. Contradictions between needs, resources, and values lead to ethical dilemmas and push away from the workforce in eldercare. To improve care workers' willingness to remain in the eldercare sector, changes are needed in the resourcing and organization of home care, including managerial support in everyday care work.

Study protocol of a mixed method pragmatic quasi-experimental trial to evaluate the day activity services targeted at older home care clients in Finland.

BACKGROUND: In Finland, the 'day activity service' is targeted at older home care clients who are unable to participate in other available activities due to poor health or functional disabilities. The aim of the day activity service is to support home care client's ability to live at home and to enhance their wellbeing and social inclusion. This mixed method study examines the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and process of the day activity service. METHODS: The target sample size is 200 participants. The intervention group (n = 100) is composed of home care clients who begin to participate in the day activity service. The comparison group (n = 100) are home care clients who do not participate in the day activity service, and whose functioning and care needs are similar to the participants of the intervention group. The primary outcome is social inclusion (ESIS-scale). Secondary outcomes are loneliness (single item and De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale) and social care related quality of life (ASCOT). Baseline, three-month and six-month follow-up surveys are gathered from intervention and comparison group participants in order to compare outcomes between groups pre- and post-intervention. Costs of health and social services, based on administrative data, and the costs of the intervention are utilized in examining the cost-effectiveness of the intervention with the above-described measurements. Qualitative data are collected by interviewing the intervention participants (n = 10) and professionals working at the day activity centres and older people's services (4 focus groups) to explore the perceived outcomes and process of the intervention to find out how and why the intervention is effective or ineffective. DISCUSSION: The study seeks to produce a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and implementation process of the day activity service. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN13146087, Registration date 03/04/2022.

Effects of 'participatory group-based care management' on wellbeing of older people living alone: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: More knowledge is needed of the effectiveness of complex interventions that aim to promote the wellbeing of older people. This study examines the effects of 'participatory group-based care management' conducted among community-dwelling older adults living alone in Central and Eastern Finland. The intervention aimed to promote wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) using a needs-based and participatory approach. METHODS: The study was carried out as a randomized control trial (intervention group n = 185, control group n = 207). In this article, baseline and 6-month follow-up surveys were used. QoL (WHOQOL-Bref instrument), loneliness (Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale; single-item question), and trust (two items of generalized trust and six items of institutional trust) were used as outcome measurements, and generalized estimating equations (GEE) modeling as the analysis method. Both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses were applied. RESULTS: According to the per-protocol analysis, the intervention had no effects on QoL. Loneliness decreased among older people with poor QoL at the baseline. Additionally, the intervention enhanced trust in other people and some dimensions of institutional trust. The intention-to-treat analysis did not result in any significant effects on QoL or loneliness, but some small positive changes in institutional trust were found. CONCLUSIONS: Based on some evidence of small positive effects, the intervention may be beneficial in alleviating loneliness and enhancing trust among older people living alone. Because of the contradictory results, more research is needed to examine the complexity of 'participatory group-based care management´ from the perspective of process evaluation.