Appendectomy for Vague Symptoms and Equivocal Physical Findings on Physical Exam and Computed Tomography.

Background: Appendicitis is a common condition affecting 7-8% of the general population. With the improvement of noninvasive imaging, the diagnostic approach and treatment algorithm for patients with clear signs and symptoms suggestive of acute appendicitis are well agreed-upon. However, patients without pathognomonic signs and symptoms, but with equivocal imaging pose a diagnostic dilemma. These patients may still have acute appendicitis and could potentially benefit from laparoscopic appendectomy. This may be especially true in the subset of patients with appendicoliths.Methods: Our case series exams a group of patients with atypical symptoms who eventually underwent appendectomy and were followed after surgery for at least a month. This case series consists of eight patients with abdominal pain accompanied by a variety of other signs and symptoms in addition to laboratory results and imagining characteristics which were nondiagnostic. These patients had initial Alvarado scores ranging from 0-6.Results: All of these patients were subsequently taken to the operating room for diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic appendectomy. Of these patients, six were known to have appendicoliths based on computed tomography obtained during initial diagnostic workup.Conclusions: All patients underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy and appendectomy. Four had appendicitis and four also had resolution of their symptoms. There exist atypical presentations of appendiceal disease. Patients with abdominal pain/tenderness, even without diagnostic laboratory results or imaging characteristics, may benefit from laparoscopic appendectomy.

Tympanic membrane perforation and hearing loss from blast overpressure in Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom wounded.

BACKGROUND: Tympanic membrane perforation is the most common primary blast injury in the current conflicts and occurs in approximately one tenth of service members wounded by combat explosions. We wanted to determine the severity of perforation and its effect on hearing and combat readiness. METHODS: This analysis is a retrospective study of US service members injured in combat explosions in Afghanistan or Iraq and treated at our institution between March 2003 and July 2006. Data captured included location and grade of perforation, symptoms, healing rates, audiogram results, need for hearing aids, and loss of eligibility for military service. RESULTS: Of 436 explosion-wounded patients admitted to our facility, 65 (15%) patients had tympanic membrane perforation diagnosed by the otolaryngology service. A total of 97 tympanic membrane perforations occurred among 65 patients. The average surface area involved was 41% +/- 32% (right) and 35% +/- 34% (left). More than one third of perforations were grade 4. The most common locations were central and anterior-inferior. Most (83%) patients reported symptoms, most commonly diminished hearing (77%) and tinnitus (50%). Outcome data were available for 77% of perforations. Spontaneous healing occurred in 48%. The remainder (52%) had surgical intervention. The most common audiogram abnormality was mild high frequency hearing loss. Ultimately, three patients (5%) required hearing aids and one discharge from military service. CONCLUSIONS: Tympanic membrane perforation occurs in 16% of explosion-injured patients. Most patients are symptomatic and many have large perforations requiring operative intervention. Long-term hearing loss is uncommon but does impact ability to continue military service.