Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Water Sci Technol ; 67(5): 1034-42, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23416595

RESUMEN

The paper compares the performance of two trickling filters (TFs) filled with plastic- or sponge-based packing media treating the effluent from an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. The UASB reactor was operated with an organic loading rate (OLR) of 1.2 kgCOD m(-3) d(-1), and the OLR applied to the TFs was 0.30-0.65 kgCOD m(-3) d(-1) (COD: chemical oxygen demand). The sponge-based packing medium (Rotosponge) gave substantially better performance for ammonia, total-N, and organic matter removal. The superior TF-Rotosponge performance for NH(4)(+)-N removal (80-95%) can be attributed to its longer biomass and hydraulic retention times (SRT and HRT), as well as enhancements in oxygen mass transfer by dispersion and advection inside the sponges. Nitrogen removals were significant (15 mgN L(-1)) in TF-Rotosponge when the OLRs were close to 0.75 kgCOD m(-3) d(-1), due to denitrification that was related to solids hydrolysis in the sponge interstices. For biochemical oxygen demand removal, higher HRT and SRT were especially important because the UASB removed most of the readily biodegradable organic matter. The new configuration of the sponge-based packing medium called Rotosponge can enhance the feasibility of scaling-up the UASB/TF treatment, including when retrofitting is necessary.


Asunto(s)
Reactores Biológicos , Plásticos , Anaerobiosis , Análisis de la Demanda Biológica de Oxígeno , Nitrificación , Nitrógeno/aislamiento & purificación , Aguas del Alcantarillado
2.
Biotechnol Bioeng ; 39(7): 790-3, 1992 Mar 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18601011

RESUMEN

An extremely accurate pseudoanalytical solution for the flux of substrate into a steady-state biofilm is developed. The standard deviations between the substrate fluxes computed from the pseudoanalytical solution and the numerical solution were less than 2.6%. Additional advantages of the pseudoanalytical solution are that it has no inaccuracies around S(min) (*) = 1 and it is composed of single continuous functions applicable to the whole S(min) (*) region.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA