Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
1.
Environ Int ; 160: 107069, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34974237

RESUMEN

In recent decades, the possibility that use of mobile communicating devices, particularly wireless (mobile and cordless) phones, may increase brain tumour risk, has been a concern, particularly given the considerable increase in their use by young people. MOBI-Kids, a 14-country (Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain) case-control study, was conducted to evaluate whether wireless phone use (and particularly resulting exposure to radiofrequency (RF) and extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields (EMF)) increases risk of brain tumours in young people. Between 2010 and 2015, the study recruited 899 people with brain tumours aged 10 to 24 years old and 1,910 controls (operated for appendicitis) matched to the cases on date of diagnosis, study region and age. Participation rates were 72% for cases and 54% for controls. The mean ages of cases and controls were 16.5 and 16.6 years, respectively; 57% were males. The vast majority of study participants were wireless phones users, even in the youngest age group, and the study included substantial numbers of long-term (over 10 years) users: 22% overall, 51% in the 20-24-year-olds. Most tumours were of the neuroepithelial type (NBT; n = 671), mainly glioma. The odds ratios (OR) of NBT appeared to decrease with increasing time since start of use of wireless phones, cumulative number of calls and cumulative call time, particularly in the 15-19 years old age group. A decreasing trend in ORs was also observed with increasing estimated cumulative RF specific energy and ELF induced current density at the location of the tumour. Further analyses suggest that the large number of ORs below 1 in this study is unlikely to represent an unknown causal preventive effect of mobile phone exposure: they can be at least partially explained by differential recall by proxies and prodromal symptoms affecting phone use before diagnosis of the cases. We cannot rule out, however, residual confounding from sources we did not measure. Overall, our study provides no evidence of a causal association between wireless phone use and brain tumours in young people. However, the sources of bias summarised above prevent us from ruling out a small increased risk.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Teléfono Celular , Glioma , Adolescente , Adulto , Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Campos Electromagnéticos/efectos adversos , Glioma/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Ondas de Radio/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
2.
Curr Oncol ; 22(6): 374-84, 2015 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26715869

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Exercise is an important therapy to improve well-being after a cancer diagnosis. Accordingly, cancer-exercise programs have been developed to enhance clinical care; however, few programs exist in Canada. Expansion of cancer-exercise programming depends on an understanding of the process of program implementation, as well as enablers and barriers to program success. Gaining knowledge from current professionals in cancer-exercise programs could serve to facilitate the necessary understanding. METHODS: Key personnel from Canadian cancer-exercise programs (n = 14) participated in semistructured interviews about program development and delivery. RESULTS: Content analysis revealed 13 categories and 15 subcategories, which were grouped by three organizing domains: Program Implementation, Program Enablers, and Program Barriers. ■ Program Implementation (5 categories, 8 subcategories) included Program Initiation (clinical care extension, research project expansion, program champion), Funding, Participant Intake (avenues of awareness, health and safety assessment), Active Programming (monitoring patient exercise progress, health care practitioner involvement, program composition), and Discharge and Follow-up Plan.■ Program Enablers (4 categories, 4 subcategories) included Patient Participation (personalized care, supportive network, personal control, awareness of benefits), Partnerships, Advocacy and Support, and Program Characteristics.■ Program Barriers (4 categories, 3 subcategories) included Lack of Funding, Lack of Physician Support, Deterrents to Participation (fear and shame, program location, competing interests), and Disease Progression and Treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Interview results provided insight into the development and delivery of cancer-exercise programs in Canada and could be used to guide future program development and expansion in Canada.

3.
Physiotherapy ; 100(3): 196-207, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24439570

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence of pre-operative exercise, known as 'prehabilitation', on peri- and postoperative outcomes in adult surgical populations. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: CENTRAL, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and PEDro were searched from 1950 to 2011. METHODS: Two reviewers independently examined relevant, English-language articles that examined the effects of pre-operative total-body exercise with peri- and postoperative outcome analysis. Given the nascence of this field, controlled and uncontrolled trials were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment tool. Only data on length of stay were considered eligible for meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity of measures and methodologies for assessing other outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 4597 citations were identified by the search strategy, of which 21 studies were included. Trials were generally small (median=54 participants) and of moderate to poor methodological quality. Compared with standard care, the majority of studies found that total-body prehabilitation improved postoperative pain, length of stay and physical function, but it was not consistently effective in improving health-related quality of life or aerobic fitness in the studies that examined these outcomes. The meta-analysis indicated that prehabilitation reduced postoperative length of stay with a small to moderate effect size (Hedges' g=-0.39, P=0.033). Intervention-related adverse events were reported in two of 669 exercising participants. CONCLUSION: The literature provides early evidence that prehabilitation may reduce length of stay and possibly provide postoperative physical benefits. Cautious interpretation of these findings is warranted given modest methodological quality and significant risk of bias.


Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Humanos , Calidad de Vida
4.
Curr Oncol ; 19(3): e136-44, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22670103

RESUMEN

A large and convincing body of evidence demonstrates the benefits of exercise for cancer survivors during and after treatment. Based on that literature, more cancer survivors should be offered exercise support and programming. Unfortunately, exercise programs remain an exception rather than the norm in cancer care. Not surprisingly, common barriers to the implementation of exercise programs in oncology include limited resources, expertise, and awareness of benefits on the part of patients and clinicians. To improve the accessibility and cost-effectiveness of cancer exercise programs, one proposed strategy is to combine the resources of hospital and community-based programs with home-based exercise instruction. The present paper highlights current literature regarding exercise programming for cancer survivors, describes the development of an exercise program for cancer patients in Toronto, Canada, and offers experiential insights into the integration of exercise into oncologic care.

5.
Health Care Women Int ; 28(9): 782-98, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17907007

RESUMEN

As most women diagnosed with cervical carcinoma have been "inadequately screened," improvements in screening are critical. After abnormal Pap test findings (through liquid-based cytology), residual specimens now can be tested simultaneously for oncogenic types of Human Papilloma virus (HPV). If these "reflex" HPV tests are negative, Pap tests need not be repeated for 12 months. Women with positive oncogenic HPV tests, however, can be referred immediately for colposcopy. There has been concern that "stigma" issues could be associated with positive HPV status (because of its sexual transmission) that might cause women to avoid this reflex HPV testing. We addressed this concern by assessing whether stigma issues surface in relation to HPV testing. We randomly selected 20 women and administered to them semistructured telephone interviews that included responses to a scenario of reflex HPV-DNA testing. Interview transcripts were analyzed qualitatively. Highly limited knowledge levels were found about HPV, but, following education about screening options, there was no rejection of HPV testing. In conclusion, it appears that women favor reflex HPV testing due to its "convenience" and perceptions that it is "the least intrusive option more definitive than Pap testing."


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/psicología , Frotis Vaginal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Salud de la Mujer
6.
J Clin Oncol ; 23(28): 6949-56, 2005 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16192583

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine which formats for presenting health-related quality of life (HRQL) data are interpreted most accurately and are most preferred by cancer patients. Patients often want a great deal of information about cancer treatments, including information relevant to HRQL. Clinical trials provide methodologically sound HRQL data that may be useful to patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multicenter study, 198 patients with previously treated cancer participated in a structured interview. Participants judged HRQL information presented in one textual and five graphical formats. Outcome measures included the accuracy of patients' interpretations and ease-of-use and helpfulness ratings for each format. RESULTS: Correct interpretations ranged from 85% to 98% across formats (F = 10.3, P < .0001) with line graphs of mean HRQL scores over time being interpreted correctly most often. Older patients and less-educated patients were less likely to interpret graphs accurately (F = 7.3, P = .008; and F = 10.6, P = .001, respectively), but all groups were most accurate on simple line graphs. Multivariate analysis revealed that format type, participant age and education were independent predictors of accuracy rates. Patients' ratings also varied across formats both for ease of understanding scores (F = 12.1, P < .0001) and for helpfulness scores (F = 13.2, P < .0001), with line graphs being rated highest on both outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients generally prefer a simple linear representation of group mean HRQL scores, and can accurately interpret data presented in this format more than 98% of the time irrespective of their age group and educational level. The findings have important implications for the communication of clinical trial HRQL results.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Neoplasias/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Lingüística , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Pronóstico
7.
Qual Life Res ; 12(4): 395-404, 2003 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12797712

RESUMEN

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a prevalent outcome measure in clinical trials, but it is not known how best to communicate HRQL results to new patients with cancer. The purpose was to explore cancer patients' attitudes toward, and preferences for, 10 visual and written formats for communicating HRQL information. Using standardized qualitative methods, six focus groups were held (two groups in each of three cancer centres) with patients who had completed treatment for cancer at least 6 months earlier. Groups were stratified according to patients' education. To ensure consistency across centres, group moderators used the same detailed guide, training video, and props. Three investigators independently coded the resulting transcripts. Participants also rated each of the 10 presentation formats as to their perceived usefulness. Fourteen men and 19 women with a variety of cancer diagnoses participated; 13 (39%) participated in the three lower-education groups and 20 (61%) in the three higher-education groups. We found that simple formats (simple graphs or written text) were generally preferred to more complex graphical information, regardless of educational level. The same format was rated favourably by the highest proportion of participants in both the high (85%) and low (85%) education level groups. Individual patients, however, varied as to which visual format they most preferred. Patients did not wish to receive HRQL information out of context or without explanation. We conclude that cancer patients desire HRQL information, but vary in their preferences for its communication. Simple formats are generally preferred.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados como Asunto , Neoplasias/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Actitud , Presentación de Datos , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Satisfacción del Paciente
8.
Gynecol Oncol ; 84(1): 72-80, 2002 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11748980

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether self-report measures of psychological distress and perceived risk were associated with nonadherence to recommended ovarian cancer surveillance. METHODS: Eighty-three patients attending the Familial Ovarian Cancer Clinic (FOCC) at Princess Margaret Hospital were assessed psychosocially prior to and during initial familial-genetic assessment and then monitored for adherence with recommended follow-up surveillance over a period of 12-18 months. The assessment protocol included an investigator-designed clinic questionnaire, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD), Life Orientation Test (LOT), Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOSSS), Texas Inventory of Grief, and the COPE. Nonadherence was measured in terms of unexplained absences at one or two recommended and scheduled surveillance appointments following the familial-genetic assessment. RESULTS: Univariate tests revealed a significant association between higher perception of ovarian cancer risk, as assessed immediately after the familial-genetic risk assessment in the clinic and nonadherence to physician-recommended surveillance (chi2 (2, N = 83) = 9.75, P < 0.008). Empirically based estimates of risk, conveyed by the clinic team to subjects, were not significantly associated with nonadherence (chi2 (2, N = 83) = 0.19, P = 0.91). Logistic regression analysis revealed that subjects who perceived themselves to be at high ovarian cancer risk were five times more likely to be nonadherent than participants who perceived themselves to be at low or medium ovarian cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that higher self-perceived risk may predict adherence difficulties to recommended surveillance in women attending a familial-genetic risk clinic.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Genéticas/psicología , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/psicología , Cooperación del Paciente , Adulto , Anciano , Salud de la Familia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medición de Riesgo
9.
Medscape Womens Health ; 6(4): 1, 2001 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11547268

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the preferred role in medical decision making of women undergoing fertility treatments and to establish whether their knowledge of treatments is adequate to inform their choices. METHODS: Self-report survey of 404 women undergoing fertility treatments in 2 university hospitals and a private fertility clinic in Canada. RESULTS: The women had been in fertility treatment for 2.3 +/- 2.6 years; 67.8% reported taking fertility drugs. Most (61.7%) women wanted to share knowledge equally with their doctors about possible fertility treatments. However, about half wanted to decide alone or mostly by themselves about the acceptability of treatment risks and benefits (56%), what treatments should be selected (49.8%), and when to conclude treatments (54.3%). In addition, 55.1% of the women did not know their personal eventual chances of pregnancy with fertility treatment or thought it was 50% or greater. Over half of the women (57.2%) who had taken fertility drugs were unaware of a possible link between fertility drugs and increased ovarian cancer risk. The majority of women (61.8%) who knew of this possible association reported that they learned about it from the print media. Women who knew of the association had a poor understanding of the strength of the evidence or the ability to detect or treat ovarian cancer successfully, and 88.3% thought they could reduce cancer risk by following their doctors' advice. CONCLUSIONS: Despite these women's wishes to actively participate in fertility treatment decisions, they lacked the necessary information to do so meaningfully. Public health policymakers, professional and advocacy organizations, physicians, other healthcare providers, and women themselves must find ways to improve the general public's and patients' understanding about fertility treatment outcomes and risks.


Asunto(s)
Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Participación del Paciente , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
J Fam Pract ; 50(8): 682-7, 2001 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11509162

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the factors involved in the cancer screening decisions of family physicians in situations where the clinical practice guidelines are unclear or conflicting as opposed to when they are clear and uncontroversial. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed discussions with focus groups using a constant comparative approach. POPULATION: A total of 73 family physicians in active practice participated in 10 focus groups (1 urban group and 1 rural group in each of 5 Canadian provinces). OUTCOME MEASURES: Our main outcome measures were participants' perceptions regarding cancer screening when the guidelines were unclear or conflicting. RESULTS: We propose a model of the determinants of cancer screening decision making with regard to unclear and conflicting guidelines. This model is rooted in the physician-patient relationship, and is an interactive process influenced by patient factors (anxiety, expectations, and family history) and physician factors (perception of guidelines, clinical practice experience, influence of colleagues, distinction between the screening styles of specialists and family physicians, and the amount of time and financial costs involved in performing the maneuver). CONCLUSIONS: Our model is unique, because it is embedded in the physician-patient relationship. Ultimately, a modified model could be used to design interventions to assist with the implementation of preventive services guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Selección de Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Canadá , Comunicación , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/métodos , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Psicológicos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Ubicación de la Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 14(6): 652-8, 2000 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11128462

RESUMEN

The specific objectives of this report were to determine (1) the usual practice of vascular surgeons with respect to risk factor inquiry and intervention, (2) which risk factors are endorsed by vascular surgeons as being very important in the management of patients with PAD, and, finally, (3) which risk factors vascular surgeons are confident in managing.


Asunto(s)
Arteriosclerosis/prevención & control , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Arteriosclerosis/etiología , Canadá , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 53(9): 920-30, 2000 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11004418

RESUMEN

Health status indexes, such as the EuroQol, consist of a health state classification system and a set of utility weights. Indexes measure quality of life using a 0-1 utility score. Utilities for outcomes in prostate cancer (PC) are of unique importance, but generic indexes do not represent PC outcomes (e.g., sexual, urinary, bowel dysfunction) well, and may not capture their full impact. As a step toward improved utility measurement, we constructed a classification system for PC. We generated items for each of six health domains and rated their importance using interviews with 10 clinical experts and 80 patients. Key concepts were selected for each domain using item importance weightings, and a set of predetermined criteria. Text was developed to express levels of severity within each domain. Experts and two additional groups of patients (n = 40, n = 96) evaluated textual clarity and endorsed the content validity of the instrument. The final system consists of 10 domains with 4-6 levels each. The content validity of the system was endorsed by patients and experts. In conjunction with a set of utility weights, it may be used to develop a health status index, to improve utility measurement in patients, and to serve as a short psychometric (nonutility) instrument.


Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Salud , Neoplasias de la Próstata/clasificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Humanos , Masculino , Ontario , Neoplasias de la Próstata/secundario , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
13.
Anesthesiology ; 93(3): 601-10, 2000 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10969291

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obstacles to the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) by elderly surgical patients have not been well-documented. Age differences in preoperative psychological factors, postoperative pain and analgesic consumption, treatment satisfaction, and concerns regarding PCA were measured to identify factors important to effective PCA use. METHODS: Preoperatively, young (mean age +/- SD, 39 +/- 9 yr; n = 45) and older (mean age +/- SD, 67 +/- 8 yr; n = 44) general surgery patients completed measures of attitudes toward and expectations of postoperative pain and PCA, psychological distress, health opinions, self-efficacy, and optimism. On the first 2 postoperative days, pain at rest and with movement and satisfaction with pain control were assessed using visual analog scales. Daily opioid intake was recorded. When PCA was discontinued, satisfaction and concerns about it were assessed. RESULTS: The older patients expected less intense pain (P

Asunto(s)
Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Satisfacción del Paciente
14.
Patient Educ Couns ; 40(2): 163-72, 2000 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10771370

RESUMEN

Heritable cancer risk assessment is an increasingly common method of deriving valuable information relevant to deciding on appropriate screening regimens and preventive treatments. Assessments of heritable risk typically include familial-genetic evaluation, where analyses relate family pedigree to cancer risk, and DNA testing, where analyses indicate genetic mutations associated with cancer risk (e.g., BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations) or their absence. In this paper we report on the psychological responses of women given familial-genetic evaluations for ovarian cancer risk. The baseline and 6 to 12 follow-up assessments of an initial clinic-attending cohort of 65 women are compared with the baseline and 9 to 12 follow-up assessments of a second clinic-attending cohort of 60 women. Sizeable differences were found in the prevalence of clinically significant depression in these two physician or self-referred populations, as assessed by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale and in the mean scores. Hypotheses accounting for these differences are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/psicología , Pruebas Genéticas/psicología , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Salud de la Familia , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales
15.
Mult Scler ; 5(4): 251-9, 1999 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10467384

RESUMEN

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and its treatment have broad-ranging effects on quality of life. This article reviews recent efforts to assess the impact of MS on activities of daily living (ADLs) and health-related quality of life (HRQL), and describes the development of the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Inventory (MSQLI). The MSQLI is a modular MS-specific HRQL instrument consisting of a widely-used generic measure, the Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36), supplemented by nine symptom-specific measures (covering fatigue, pain, bladder function, bowel function, emotional status, perceived cognitive function, visual function, sexual satisfaction, and social relationships). Content validation consisted of evaluating its adherence to a conceptual model of the impact of MS, and review by MS specialists (neurologists and allied health professionals), HRQL experts, patients, and caregivers. The reliability and construct validity of the MSQLI were rigorously evaluated in a field test with 300 North American patients (198 female, 102 male) with definite MS (Poser criteria) and a broad range of physical impairment (EDSS=0. 0-8.5). This article concludes by comparing the MSQLI with two other MS-specific HRQL measures (MS Quality of Life-54 (QOL-54) and Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS)) and discussing key issues to consider in selecting an HRQL instrument for a collaborative database.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Esclerosis Múltiple/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Actividades Cotidianas , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/prevención & control , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Proyectos Piloto , Pruebas Psicológicas , Desempeño Psicomotor , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
Gynecol Oncol ; 74(3): 331-7, 1999 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10479489

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychological adjustment of women during initial genetic ovarian cancer risk assessment and at clinic follow-up, 6-12 months later. METHODS: Sixty-five subjects were assessed with the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), Spielberger's State Anxiety Inventory, and an 18-item, investigator-designed questionnaire yielding self-report on screening responses, worry about increased risk, identification of cancer-related deaths in relatives, worry about future cancer risks of daughters, alteration of future plans as a result of ovarian cancer risk, etc. RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of subjects had CESD scores above the established cutoff for depression at baseline and 38% had scores above cutoff at follow-up. Sixteen percent of subjects had state scores on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory higher than 1 standard deviation above average (norm) at baseline, while only 6% had scores higher than 1 SD above average at follow-up. CONCLUSION: To identify factors associated with self-reported depression at follow-up, a series of demographic and self-reported variables (e.g., presence of identified problems in family, impact of genetic risk information, concern for daughter in the future) were entered in a multiple regression analysis with the CESD follow-up score as the dependent variable. Only one predictor accounted for a significant amount of variance in depression scores. Concern for daughter's risk in the future was associated with higher depression scores at follow-up (R = 0.33, P<0.02, R(2) = 11%).


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/psicología , Adulto , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Medición de Riesgo
17.
Patient Educ Couns ; 38(2): 161-5, 1999 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14560712

RESUMEN

The motivations of cancer patients in seeking complementary therapies are, fundamentally, self-healing motivations which, when engaged appropriately, can contribute to the patient's psychological and physical well being. In this paper, we apply a theoretical model, the Risk Adaptation Model, to furthering the clinical understanding of the motivations of cancer patients in seeking complementary therapies. The model identifies six discrete cognitive processes which, in combination, are hypothesized to play a central role in therapy seeking. Emphasis in this model is placed on the patient's need to maintain positive expectancies (optimism) when faced with the risk and uncertainty of cancer. This understanding of complementary-therapy seeking is grounded in the perspective that clinicians must respect the autonomy of cancer patients in their quest for appropriate therapies, and assist rather than direct their process of therapy-seeking.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/psicología , Motivación , Neoplasias/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Cognición , Consejo , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Modelos Psicológicos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Neoplasias/terapia , Defensa del Paciente , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Autonomía Personal , Psicoterapia , Autoeficacia , Apoyo Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Incertidumbre
18.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 22(5): 409-22, 1998 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9733263

RESUMEN

Bone marrow transplant (BMT) is a procedure used for the treatment of a variety of cancers and malignant diseases. Recovery from this intensive process requires a long-term course, often accompanied by acute morbidity which includes various distressing physical symptoms. Recent literature has begun to explore the impact of this procedure on quality of life and psychosocial issues. While survivorship is often associated with a highly rated global quality of life, recovery from BMT is accompanied by several psychosocial difficulties which negatively impact patients. Fatigue is a common complaint, often hindering recipients for several years following their transplant. As well, reports of psychological distress, psychiatric symptoms, and/or mood disturbances such as anxiety or depression are not uncommon. Many patients also indicate interruption of sexual activity and increased sexual difficulty for several months following BMT. While some investigators have begun to examine hormone replacement therapy (HRT) as a treatment option for reducing sexual dysfunction, there is a general paucity of literature evaluating interventions for BMT survivors. This article reviews the literature examining various quality of life aspects including fatigue, psychosocial difficulties, and sexual functioning of patients during recovery from BMT. Limitations of past research are discussed and directions for future research suggested.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea/psicología , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Psicóticos/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Conducta Sexual/psicología
19.
Neurosurg Focus ; 4(6): e6, 1998 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17154446

RESUMEN

Quality-of-life assessments in neurooncology are becoming more relevant with the proliferation of intensive research into brain tumors and their therapy. In this review, the authors examined several aspects and problems associated with the past, present, and future applications of quality-of-life assessments in neurooncology. The inadequacy of the almost exclusive use of physical functioning assessments, image-documented tumor response to therapy, and patient survival time as endpoints when evaluating therapeutic regimens is becoming increasingly apparent. In therapies in which outcome using traditional endpoints are only marginally different, specific (neurological) toxicity and social and psychological outcomes must be evaluated as well to determine valid treatment options. Also becoming widely accepted is the consideration of patient values of specific health states in justifying treatment resources. There is ongoing research in brain tumor patients to address these issues.

20.
Fertil Steril ; 68(1): 90-4, 1997 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9207590

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of asking women undergoing fertility treatment the maximum increased risk of ovarian cancer they would be willing to tolerate in order to take ovulation-induction drugs. DESIGN: A prospective pilot study of women attending fertility clinics over a 2-month period. SETTING: Two tertiary care fertility clinics in Toronto. PATIENT(S): Sixty-one English-speaking women were approached and 85% (n = 52) were enrolled. INTERVENTION(S): A self-administered questionnaire with fertility-specific questions. Thirty-eight women also were asked to complete standardized scales of anxiety and optimism. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Women's report of the maximum level of lifetime risk of ovarian cancer they were willing to tolerate in order to undergo fertility treatment. RESULT(S): Seventy-nine percent were willing to accept an increased risk of ovarian cancer. Only 24% understood that treatment for ovarian cancer usually was not curative. CONCLUSION(S): A majority of patients were willing to tolerate a modest increase in their lifetime risk of ovarian cancer because of fertility treatment, most basing their estimate of acceptable risk on limited awareness of the issue.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/efectos adversos , Infertilidad Femenina/tratamiento farmacológico , Infertilidad Femenina/psicología , Neoplasias Ováricas/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Ontario , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...