Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Span J Psychol ; 20: E1, 2017 Jan 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28095931

RESUMEN

The aim of the study was to assess the validity of the Anger Rumination Scale (ARS; Sukhodolsky, Golub, & Cromwell, 2001) in a Mexican sample (n = 700, M age = 38.6, SD = 12.42). Through confirmatory factor analysis and using modification indices, the four-factor structure of the original scale was replicated: angry afterthoughts, thoughts of revenge, angry memories, and understanding of causes. In addition, the four-factor model had better goodness of fit indices than rival models with three and two factors. Alpha reliabilities were acceptable (.72 -.89). ARS results correlated with measures of state anger, trait anger, anger expression, and anger control (negatively); correlations were significant (ps < .001) ARS outcomes also correlated (ps < .001) with physical and verbal aggression, hostility, anger, and emotion suppression, suggesting convergent validity. Men reported more thoughts of revenge than women (p < .001; Eta squared = .026), but there was no evidence of gender differences on the other anger rumination scales, or in total scores.


Asunto(s)
Agresión/fisiología , Ira/fisiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Pensamiento/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría , Furor/fisiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven
2.
Span. j. psychol ; 20: e1.1-e1.9, 2017. tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-160533

RESUMEN

The aim of the study was to assess the validity of the Anger Rumination Scale (ARS; Sukhodolsky, Golub, & Cromwell, 2001) in a Mexican sample (n = 700, Mage = 38.6, SD = 12.42). Through confirmatory factor analysis and using modification indices, the four-factor structure of the original scale was replicated: angry afterthoughts, thoughts of revenge, angry memories, and understanding of causes. In addition, the four-factor model had better goodness of fit indices than rival models with three and two factors. Alpha reliabilities were acceptable (.72 -.89). ARS results correlated with measures of state anger, trait anger, anger expression, and anger control (negatively); correlations were significant (ps < .001) ARS outcomes also correlated (ps < .001) with physical and verbal aggression, hostility, anger, and emotion suppression, suggesting convergent validity. Men reported more thoughts of revenge than women (p < .001; Eta squared = .026), but there was no evidence of gender differences on the other anger rumination scales, or in total scores (AU)


No disponible


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Agresión/psicología , Ira/fisiología , Furor/fisiología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicometría/métodos , Psicometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Emoción Expresada/fisiología , Adaptación Psicológica/fisiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Análisis Multivariante , Análisis de Varianza , Bienestar Social/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...