RESUMEN
Aims & objectives: Meaningful clinical interpretation of orthopaedic patient-reported outcome scores remains challenging. Grouping scores may be more meaningful than individual score analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine if grouping knee surgery patients into four preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) clusters would have prognostic value for two-year postoperative outcomes. Materials & methods: 488 of 697 (70%) patients undergoing elective knee surgery at a single urban institution were enrolled in an orthopaedic registry and completed two-year follow up. Patients were administered questionnaires for PROMIS, International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC), Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS), and Surgical Satisfaction (SSQ-8). A k-means cluster analysis was performed to identify preoperative PROMIS clusters. Chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted for bivariate analyses. Least-squares multiple linear regression models were performed to identify if cluster group was an independent predictor. Results: Cluster analysis revealed four clusters of patients. Psychological distress was most significant in determining classification. More impaired clusters were associated with higher rates of arthroplasty, African American race, preoperative opioid use, lower income, higher comorbidity index, and other sociodemographic and operative factors. Worse preoperative cluster status was associated with higher chance of achieving minimally clinically important change (MCID) on all metrics except PROMIS Pain Interference (PI), IKDC, and MARS. Multivariable analysis confirmed better preoperative cluster as predictive of better PROMIS Physical Function (PF), PI, IKDC scores, and satisfaction. Worse preoperative cluster was predictive of greater improvement on PF and PI but not IKDC. Conclusion: Preoperative PROMIS clusters have prognostic value in predicting outcomes for knee surgery patients. Better preoperative cluster function predicts superior outcomes. While worse preoperative cluster predicts worse outcome, all clusters still significantly improve, so worse preoperative cluster is not a contraindication to surgery.
RESUMEN
Liver disease and the subsequent loss of liver function is an enormous clinical challenge. A severe shortage of donor liver tissue greatly limits patients' options for a timely transplantation. Tissue engineering approaches offer a promising alternative to organ transplantation by engineering artificial implantable tissues. We have established a platform of cell-laden microbeads as basic building blocks to assemble macroscopic tissues via different mechanisms. This modular fabrication strategy possesses great potential for liver tissue engineering in a bottom-up manner. In this study, we encapsulated human hepatocytes into microbeads presenting a favorable microenvironment consisting of collagen and mesenchymal stem cells, and then we perfused the beads in a three-dimensional printed tubular perfusion bioreactor that promoted oxygen and medium diffusion to the impregnated cells. We noted high cell vitality and retention of parenchymal cell functionality for up to 30 days in this culture system. Our engineering-based approach led to the advancement in tissue size and long-term functionality of an artificial liver tissue in vitro.