The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Management of Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous malignancy with high metastatic potential. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is used to assess locoregional spread, facilitate staging, and inform prognosis. Positive nodal status is associated with higher recurrence rates and reduced overall survival. Methods: A systematic search was conducted. Eligible articles included patients diagnosed with MCC, who would be candidates for or who had SLNB. The Covidence tool was used for screening and data extraction, including additional treatments, disease-free survival, overall survival, and recurrence. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottowa Scale criteria. Results: SLNB was associated with increased likelihood of completion lymphadenectomy (223 versus 41), regional radiotherapy (2167 versus 808), and systemic chemotherapy (138 versus 31). Overall survival for patients undergoing SLNB was 81% at 2 years, 75% at 3 years, and 72% at 5 years (odds ratio: 0.79). Hazard ratio for positive SLNB versus negative was 3.36 (P < 0.001). Five-year disease recurrence was 23.3% in patients undergoing SLNB. Conclusions: Lymph node metastases are associated with reduced overall survival and increased recurrence of MCC. Determining nodal status early can inform prognosis, facilitate staging, and determine need for adjuvant treatment. Adjuvant treatments are associated with reduced mortality and improved overall survival; SLNB is an important influencer of their use. Early prophylactic intervention should be considered in MCC in both positive and negative nodal status to improve overall outcomes. Widespread use of SLNB will allow more accurate assessment of the role of nodal status on adjuvant treatment and long-term outcomes.

The incidence and severity of diabetic hand infection presentations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Level of evidence: IV.

To bleed or not to bleed? Case series and discussion of haemorrhage risk with enzymatic debridement in burn injuries.

Introduction: Surgical burn excision (along with skin grafting) carries the risk of blood loss. The use of enzymatic debridement agents such as Nexobrid® has gained increased popularity as an alternative to surgical debridement in the management of burns with its reported benefits of selective burn debridement, minimising blood loss and potentially reducing the need for skin grafting. However, there is limited evidence regarding its effects on bleeding. Currently, the manufacturer declares there is no evidence for increased risk of localised bleeding and its systemic effects upon coagulation are less clear. Methods: We present two clinical cases demonstrating the possible effects of Nexobrid® on coagulation and bleeding at the debridement site. Comparisons are drawn with the manufacturers' guidance as well as evaluating the current recommendations of its use. Discussion: Nexobrid® is a novel therapy and there are few adverse effects reported in the literature. The basis of its appeal is the reduced blood loss at the debridement site and the selectivity it possesses in preserving healthy dermis. However, our cases have demonstrated that haemorrhage can occur and that those using Nexobrid® should be mindful of the potential bleeding risk from varicosities within the burn wound. We have also illustrated that Nexobrid® can be used in patients with pre-existing clotting disorders without requiring the use of blood products. However, we emphasise the importance of haematological support for its safe administration. Lay Summary: Nexobrid®, a debriding agent that contains enzymes, has been developed as an alternative to surgery which for most surgeons is the traditional method of removing dead tissue following a burn injury. The active agent is bromelain and this is derived from the stems of pineapples. This novel treatment is increasingly being used in the management of middle to deep skin thickness burns and it seems to have a number of benefits such as reducing blood loss, reducing the need for skin grafting as well as being able to treat burns in certain areas of the body that would be technically challenging to remove in the standard fashion. It simply targets the dead tissue leaving viable remnants of the skin that would hopefully allow healing to occur without the need for surgical intervention. Being a relatively new concept, current evidence regarding the safety and value of Nexobrid® continues to develop. In 2020, an agreement guideline outlining best practice with the use of Nexobrid® was published. In this statement, it was advised that caution should be taken when using Nexobrid® in patients who have blood clotting disturbances as this could increase the likelihood of bleeding. However, they did not mention that excessive bleeding can potentially occur with this treatment.We present two clinical cases demonstrating the possible effects of Nexobrid® on the clotting system and bleeding at the application site. Comparisons are drawn with the manufacturers' guidance as well as assessing the current recommendations of its use. We illustrate that Nexobrid® can be safely used in patients with pre-existing clotting disturbances if the correct procedures are performed. We also highlight the potential complication of excessive bleeding if Nexobrid® is used in patients who have co-existing enlarged surface veins along with their burn injury. We feel the guidance should be updated to reflect these findings.

Renal injury in a patient with lumbar scoliosis.

Kidney laceration following blunt trauma is responsible for up to 3% of trauma cases. The risk factors associated with renal injury are attributed to the risks of mechanical injury. However, anatomical variations that may accelerate the insult of injury are poorly documented. This case report describes a 25-year-old with degenerative lumbar scoliosis who presented with flank pain and visible haematuria following a low-impact injury. The patient had a grade IV renal injury. The curvature of the spine, shown on CT imaging, revealed a reduced retroperitoneal space around the left kidney. This case explores lumbar scoliosis as a risk factor for kidney laceration. We hypothesise that this increased risk is associated with asymmetry of the spine and reduced anatomical space in the retroperitoneum. Patients with lumbar scoliosis may be considered a high-risk category for renal injury, following low-impact trauma.

Autologous fat grafting for scars, healing and pain: a review.

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines suggest a multimodal approach to treating scars but there is no gold standard for treatment; however, there is exciting therapeutic potential for the use of autologous fat grafting (AFG). Functional and aesthetic improvements have been reported, including pain relief and scar quality improvement. AIMS: To explore the current evidence regarding the use of AFG in hypertrophic and painful scars. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using 11 MeSH terms in PubMed, Medline and EMBASE. English studies that used AFG to treat scars in human participants were included. RESULTS: A total of 746 studies were found and 23 studies (from 2008 to 2016) were included: five studies were evidence level V; nine studies were evidence level IV; eight were evidence level III; and one study was evidence level II. A total of 1158 patients were assessed for improvement in scar characteristics including colour, thickness, volume, pain and restoration of function at affected sites, following treatment. Positive outcomes were noted for all parameters and a significant improvement in AFG's analgesic effect was recorded in 567 out of 966 patients, P < 0.05. DISCUSSION: AFG is a minimally invasive and safe approach to treating scars, a promising alternative to surgical excision. The technique of blunt cannula insertion optimises the release of scar retraction, which contributes to the analgesic effect of this treatment method. The evidence supports current theories of mesenchymal stem cell's regenerative and anti-inflammatory properties responsible for scar healing. There are limited high quality studies to support its use and future randomised controlled trials should be conducted.