Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Gastroenterology ; 161(1): 196-210, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33745946

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Understanding the mechanisms by which tumors adapt to therapy is critical for developing effective combination therapeutic approaches to improve clinical outcomes for patients with cancer. METHODS: To identify promising and clinically actionable targets for managing colorectal cancer (CRC), we conducted a patient-centered functional genomics platform that includes approximately 200 genes and paired this with a high-throughput drug screen that includes 262 compounds in four patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) from patients with CRC. RESULTS: Both screening methods identified exportin 1 (XPO1) inhibitors as drivers of DNA damage-induced lethality in CRC. Molecular characterization of the cellular response to XPO1 inhibition uncovered an adaptive mechanism that limited the duration of response in TP53-mutated, but not in TP53-wild-type CRC models. Comprehensive proteomic and transcriptomic characterization revealed that the ATM/ATR-CHK1/2 axes were selectively engaged in TP53-mutant CRC cells upon XPO1 inhibitor treatment and that this response was required for adapting to therapy and escaping cell death. Administration of KPT-8602, an XPO1 inhibitor, followed by AZD-6738, an ATR inhibitor, resulted in dramatic antitumor effects and prolonged survival in TP53-mutant models of CRC. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings anticipate tremendous therapeutic benefit and support the further evaluation of XPO1 inhibitors, especially in combination with DNA damage checkpoint inhibitors, to elicit an enduring clinical response in patients with CRC harboring TP53 mutations.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Proteínas de la Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutada/antagonistas & inhibidores , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carioferinas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Mutación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Receptores Citoplasmáticos y Nucleares/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genética , Animales , Proteínas de la Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutada/metabolismo , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/metabolismo , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Bases de Datos Genéticas , Células HCT116 , Células HT29 , Humanos , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Carioferinas/metabolismo , Ratones , Morfolinas/administración & dosificación , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Receptores Citoplasmáticos y Nucleares/metabolismo , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , Proteína Exportina 1
2.
Gastroenterology ; 154(5): 1465-1479.e13, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29305935

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cirrhosis results from accumulation of myofibroblasts derived from quiescent hepatic stellate cells (Q-HSCs); it regresses when myofibroblastic HSCs are depleted. Hedgehog signaling promotes transdifferentiation of HSCs by activating Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1 or YAP) and inducing aerobic glycolysis. However, increased aerobic glycolysis alone cannot meet the high metabolic demands of myofibroblastic HSCs. Determining the metabolic processes of these cells could lead to strategies to prevent progressive liver fibrosis, so we investigated whether glutaminolysis (conversion of glutamine to alpha-ketoglutarate) sustains energy metabolism and permits anabolism when Q-HSCs become myofibroblastic, and whether this is controlled by hedgehog signaling to YAP. METHODS: Primary HSCs were isolated from C57BL/6 or Smoflox/flox mice; we also performed studies with rat and human myofibroblastic HSCs. We measured changes of glutaminolytic genes during culture-induced primary HSC transdifferentiation. Glutaminolysis was disrupted in cells by glutamine deprivation or pathway inhibitors (bis-2-[5-phenylacetamido-1,2,4-thiadiazol-2-yl] ethyl sulfide, CB-839, epigallocatechin gallate, and aminooxyacetic acid), and effects on mitochondrial respiration, cell growth and migration, and fibrogenesis were measured. Hedgehog signaling to YAP was disrupted in cells by adenovirus expression of Cre-recombinase or by small hairpin RNA knockdown of YAP. Hedgehog and YAP activity were inhibited by incubation of cells with cyclopamine or verteporfin, and effects on glutaminolysis were measured. Acute and chronic liver fibrosis were induced in mice by intraperitoneal injection of CCl4 or methionine choline-deficient diet. Some mice were then given injections of bis-2-[5-phenylacetamido-1,2,4-thiadiazol-2-yl] ethyl sulfide to inhibit glutaminolysis, and myofibroblast accumulation was measured. We also performed messenger RNA and immunohistochemical analyses of percutaneous liver biopsies from healthy human and 4 patients with no fibrosis, 6 patients with mild fibrosis, and 3 patients with severe fibrosis. RESULTS: Expression of genes that regulate glutaminolysis increased during transdifferentiation of primary Q-HSCs into myofibroblastic HSCs, and inhibition of glutaminolysis disrupted transdifferentiation. Blocking glutaminolysis in myofibroblastic HSCs suppressed mitochondrial respiration, cell growth and migration, and fibrogenesis; replenishing glutaminolysis metabolites to these cells restored these activities. Knockout of the hedgehog signaling intermediate smoothened or knockdown of YAP inhibited expression of glutaminase, the rate-limiting enzyme in glutaminolysis. Hedgehog and YAP inhibitors blocked glutaminolysis and suppressed myofibroblastic activities in HSCs. In livers of patients and of mice with acute or chronic fibrosis, glutaminolysis was induced in myofibroblastic HSCs. In mice with liver fibrosis, inhibition of glutaminase blocked accumulation of myofibroblasts and fibrosis progression. CONCLUSIONS: Glutaminolysis controls accumulation of myofibroblast HSCs in mice and might be a therapeutic target for cirrhosis.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/metabolismo , Metabolismo Energético , Glutamina/metabolismo , Proteínas Hedgehog/metabolismo , Células Estrelladas Hepáticas/metabolismo , Cirrosis Hepática/metabolismo , Hígado/metabolismo , Miofibroblastos/metabolismo , Fosfoproteínas/metabolismo , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/genética , Animales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular , Proliferación Celular , Transdiferenciación Celular , Células Cultivadas , Reprogramación Celular , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Glutaminasa/metabolismo , Proteínas Hedgehog/genética , Células Estrelladas Hepáticas/patología , Humanos , Ácidos Cetoglutáricos/metabolismo , Hígado/patología , Cirrosis Hepática/genética , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Cirrosis Hepática Experimental/genética , Cirrosis Hepática Experimental/metabolismo , Cirrosis Hepática Experimental/patología , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Noqueados , Mitocondrias Hepáticas/metabolismo , Mitocondrias Hepáticas/patología , Miofibroblastos/patología , Fenotipo , Fosfoproteínas/genética , Interferencia de ARN , Ratas , Transducción de Señal , Receptor Smoothened/genética , Receptor Smoothened/metabolismo , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Transcripción , Transfección , Proteínas Señalizadoras YAP
3.
Mol Cancer Ther ; 16(7): 1435-1442, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28468778

RESUMEN

Developing realistic preclinical models using clinical samples that mirror complex tumor biology and behavior are vital to advancing cancer research. While cell line cultures have been helpful in generating preclinical data, the genetic divergence between these and corresponding primary tumors has limited clinical translation. Conversely, patient-derived xenografts (PDX) in colorectal cancer are highly representative of the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity in the original tumor. Coupled with high-throughput analyses and bioinformatics, these PDXs represent robust preclinical tools for biomarkers, therapeutic target, and drug discovery. Successful PDX engraftment is hypothesized to be related to a series of anecdotal variables namely, tissue source, cancer stage, tumor grade, acquisition strategy, time to implantation, exposure to prior systemic therapy, and genomic heterogeneity of tumors. Although these factors at large can influence practices and patterns related to xenotransplantation, their relative significance in determining the success of establishing PDXs is uncertain. Accordingly, we systematically examined the predictive ability of these factors in establishing PDXs using 90 colorectal cancer patient specimens that were subcutaneously implanted into immunodeficient mice. Fifty (56%) PDXs were successfully established. Multivariate analyses showed tissue acquisition strategy [surgery 72.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 58.2-82.6) vs. biopsy 35% (95% CI: 22.1%-50.6%)] to be the key determinant for successful PDX engraftment. These findings contrast with current empiricism in generating PDXs and can serve to simplify or liberalize PDX modeling protocols. Better understanding the relative impact of these factors on efficiency of PDX formation will allow for pervasive integration of these models in care of colorectal cancer patients. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(7); 1435-42. ©2017 AACR.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto/métodos , Animales , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Estadificación de Neoplasias
4.
Oncoscience ; 2(10): 797-8, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26682250
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...