Influence of semi-quantitative oestrogen receptor expression on adjuvant endocrine therapy efficacy in ductal and lobular breast cancer - a TEAM study analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies suggest better efficacy of chemotherapy in invasive ductal breast carcinomas (IDC) than invasive lobular breast carcinomas (ILC). However, data on efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapy regimens and histological subtypes are sparse. This study assessed endocrine therapy efficacy in IDC and ILC. The influence of semi-quantitative oestrogen receptor (ER) expression by Allred score was also investigated. METHODS: Dutch and Belgian patients enrolled in the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial were randomized to exemestane (25mg daily) alone or following tamoxifen (20mg daily) for 5 years. Inclusion was restricted to IDC and ILC patients. Histological subtype was assessed locally; ER expression was centrally reviewed according to Allred score (ER-poor (<7; n=235); ER-rich (7; n=1789)). Primary end-point was relapse-free survival (RFS), which was the time from randomization to disease relapse. FINDINGS: Overall, 2140 (82%) IDC and 463 (18%) ILC patients were included. RFS was similar for both endocrine treatment regimens in IDC (hazard ratio (HR) for exemestane was 0.83 (95%confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.03)), and ILC (HR 0.69 (95%CI 0.45-1.06)). Irrespective of histological subtype, patients with ER-rich Allred scores allocated to exemestane alone had an improved RFS (multivariable HR 0.71 (95%CI 0.56-0.89)). In contrast, patients with ER-poor Allred scores allocated to exemestane had a worse RFS (multivariable HR 2.33 (95%CI 1.32-4.11)). Significant effect modification by ER-Allred score was confirmed (multivariable p=0.003). INTERPRETATION: Efficacy of endocrine therapy regimens was similar for IDC and ILC. However, ER-rich patients showed superior efficacy to upfront exemestane, while ER-poor patients had better outcomes with sequential therapy, irrespective of histological subtype, emphasising the relevance of quantification of ER expression.

DNA repair and replication proteins as prognostic markers in melanoma.

AIMS: Elevated expression of DNA repair and replication genes has been reported in thick, non-fixed primary melanomas that subsequently went on to metastasize, when compared to non-recurrent primary tumours. This increased expression could contribute to the extreme resistance shown by melanoma to DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics. We have investigated the hypothesis that levels of key DNA repair and replication proteins are prognostic biomarkers in melanoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a tissue microarray containing samples from all stages of melanomagenesis to investigate the hypothesis that levels of key DNA repair and replication proteins are prognostic biomarkers in a larger, more representative and readily available set of fixed primary melanomas. High expression of topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A), that relieves torsional stress during DNA replication, and XRCC5 (Ku80), required for DNA double-strand break repair, were associated with significantly worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Two (XRCC5 and TOP2A) of seven DNA repair and replication proteins studied were prognostic for melanoma.

Heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification: impact on patient outcome and a clinically relevant definition.

Heterogeneous expression or amplification is a challenge to HER2 diagnostics. A guideline defines heterogeneity as the presence of between 5% and 50% cells with HER2/CEP17 ratios of more than 2.20. We audited the frequency of such cells and their clinical impact in the results from 2 pathology laboratories combined with data from the TEAM [Tamoxifen vs Exemestane Adjuvant Multicentre] pathology study. HER2 reports were scanned and the percentages of amplified cells reported. Of 6,461 eligible cases, 754 (11.7%) exhibited 50% or more cells with ratios of more than 2.20, which is "amplified" by College of American Pathologists guidelines. Of the cases, 2,166 (33.5%) exhibited more than 5% but less than 50% of cells with HER2/CEP17 ratios of more than 2.20, or "heterogeneous amplification." No prognostic impact was observed when fewer than 30% of cells exhibited ratios of more than 2.20. All amplified cases with 30% to 50% of cells with ratios more than 2.20 were identified as such by United Kingdom guidelines. The percentage of tumor cells with HER2/CEP17 ratios more than 2.20 does not identify cases with heterogeneous amplification or poor outcome. A modified approach for identification of true heterogeneous amplification is suggested.

Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor as predictive biomarkers of response to endocrine therapy: a prospectively powered pathology study in the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational trial.

PURPOSE: The Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial included a prospectively planned pathology substudy testing the predictive value of progesterone receptor (PgR) expression for outcome of estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) early breast cancer treated with exemestane versus tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pathology blocks from 4,781 TEAM patients randomly assigned to exemestane versus tamoxifen followed by exemestane for 5 years of total therapy were collected centrally, and tissue microarrays were constructed from samples from 4,598 patients. Quantitative analysis of hormone receptors (ER and PgR) was performed by using image analysis and immunohistochemistry, and the results were linked to outcome data from the main TEAM trial and analyzed relative to disease-free survival and treatment. RESULTS: Of 4,325 eligible ER-positive patients, 23% were PgR-poor (Allred < 4) and 77% were PgR- rich (Allred ≥ 5). No treatment-by-marker effect for PgR was observed for exemestane versus tamoxifen (PgR-rich hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.05; PgR-poor HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.19; P = .88 for interaction). Both PgR and ER expression were associated with patient prognosis in univariate (PgR HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.65; P < .001; ER HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.86; P = .002), and multivariate analyses (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively). A trend toward a treatment-by-marker effect for ER-rich patients was observed. CONCLUSION: Preferential exemestane versus tamoxifen treatment benefit was not predicted by PgR expression; conversely, patients with ER-rich tumors may derive additional benefit from exemestane. Quantitative analysis of ER and PgR expression provides highly significant information on risk of early relapse (within 1 to 3 years) during treatment.

Automated image analysis for high-throughput quantitative detection of ER and PR expression levels in large-scale clinical studies: the TEAM Trial Experience.

AIMS: Routine immunohistochemistry is regarded as a semiquantitative method for the evaluation of in situ protein expression. Analysis of tissue biomarkers in large clinical trials is central to the development of novel targeted approaches to therapy, requires the analysis of tens of thousands of data points, and frequently makes use of high-throughput analysis of tissue microarrays (TMAs). The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of image analysis for accurate and reproducible quantitative evaluation of biomarkers. METHODS AND RESULTS: We showed, in 397 cases of breast cancer from the Phase III TEAM clinical trial, excellent correlations between semiautomated image analysis of TMAs and manual scoring of oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) levels (interclass correlation coefficients 0.93 and 0.96 respectively). Two or more TMA cores were excellently correlated with manual scores, and using more than three cores increased the number of cases available for analysis to >92%. TMAs are confirmed as representative of whole sections for immunohistochemical analysis of the tissue biomarkers ER and PR. CONCLUSIONS: Semiautomated image analysis is appropriate for the analysis of tissue biomarkers within large clinical trials. These data provide support for the use of TMAs and image analysis in translational research.