Clinical outcome after dorso-ventral stabilization of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine with vertebral body replacement and dorsal stabilization.

PURPOSE: Surgical stabilization of the spine by vertebral body replacement (VBR) is used for spinal disorders such as traumatic fractures to provide an anatomical re-adjustment of the spine to prevent late detrimental effects and pain [1-4]. This study addresses the clinical outcome after a ventral intervention with VBR and bisegmental fusion. METHODS: The study includes 76 patients (mean age: 59.34 ± 15.97; 34 females and 42 males) with fractures in the lower thoracic and lumbar spine. They were selected from patients of our hospital who received an anterolateral VBR surgery on the corresponding lower spine region over a nine-year period. Only patients were examined with X-rays and complete follow-up records. Exclusion criteria were changes due to degeneration and pathological fractures. Patients were divided into two groups, the thoracotomy group (Th10-L1) and the lumbotomy group (L2-5), respectively. Minimum one year after surgery, patients were asked about their well-being using a precasted questionnaire. RESULTS: No significant differences with respect to the subjective impression of the patients concerning their back pain, spinal functional impairment, their general functional status and their quality of life impairment. Unfortunately, however, only a rather modest but significant increase of the post-surgical life quality was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent VBR in the lower thoracic or lumbar spine show modest long-term well-being. The results suggest that injuries to the lower thoracic or lumbar spine requiring vertebral body replacement should be classified as severe injuries since they adversely affect the patients' long-term well-being. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study of clinical outcome of patients after vertebral body replacement of the ventral thoracal and lumbal spine, DRKS00031452. Registered 10th March 2023 - Prospectively registered. Trial registration number DRKS00031452.

Advantage of ostarine over raloxifene and their combined treatments for muscle of estrogen-deficient rats.

PURPOSE: Selective androgen (ostarine, OST) and estrogen (raloxifene, RAL) receptor modulators with improved tissue selectivity have been developed as alternatives to hormone replacement therapy. We investigated the combined effects of OST and RAL on muscle tissue in an estrogen-deficient rat model of postmenopausal conditions. METHODS: Three-month-old Sprague Dawley rats were divided into groups: (1) untreated non-ovariectomized rats (Non-OVX), (2) untreated ovariectomized rats (OVX), (3) OVX rats treated with OST, (4) OVX rats treated with RAL, (5) OVX rats treated with OST and RAL. Both compounds were administered in the diet. The average dose received was 0.6 ± 0.1 mg for OST and 11.1 ± 1.2 mg for RAL per kg body weight/day. After thirteen weeks, rat activity, muscle weight, structure, gene expression, and serum markers were analyzed. RESULTS: OST increased muscle weight, capillary ratio, insulin-like growth factor 1 (Igf-1) expression, serum phosphorus, uterine weight. RAL decreased muscle weight, capillary ratio, food intake, serum calcium and increased Igf-1 and Myostatin expression, serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). OST + RAL increased muscle nucleus ratio, uterine weight, serum phosphorus, FSH and luteinizing hormone and decreased body and muscle weight, serum calcium. Neither treatment changed muscle fiber size. OVX increased body and muscle weight, decreased uterine weight, serum calcium and magnesium. CONCLUSION: OST had beneficial effects on muscle in OVX rats. Side effects of OST on the uterus and serum electrolytes should be considered before using it for therapeutic purposes. RAL and RAL + OST had less effect on muscle and showed endocrinological side effects on pituitary-gonadal axis.

A combined treatment with selective androgen and estrogen receptor modulators prevents bone loss in orchiectomized rats.

PURPOSE: Enobosarm (EN), a selective androgen receptor modulator and raloxifene (RAL), a selective estrogen receptor modulator, have been shown to improve bone tissue in osteoporotic males. The present study evaluated the effects of a combination therapy of EN and RAL on bone properties in orchiectomized rats compared to the respective single treatments. METHODS: Eight-month-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were either left intact (Non-Orx) or orchiectomized (Orx). The Orx rats were divided into four groups (n = 15 each): 1) Orx, 2) EN treatment (Orx + EN), 3) RAL treatment (Orx + RAL), 4) combined treatment (Orx + EN + RAL). EN and RAL (0.4 mg and 7 mg/kg body weight/day) were applied immediately after Orx with a soy-free pelleted diet for up to 18 weeks. The lumbar spine and femora were examined by micro-CT, biomechanical, histomorphological, ashing, and gene expression analyses. RESULTS: EN exhibited an anabolic effect on bone, improving some of its parameters in Orx rats, but did not affect biomechanical properties. RAL exhibited antiresorptive activity, maintaining the biomechanical and trabecular parameters of Orx rats at the levels of Non-Orx rats. EN + RAL exerted a stronger effect than the single treatments, improving most of the bone parameters. Liver weight increased after all treatments; the kidney, prostate, and levator ani muscle weights increased after EN and EN + RAL treatments. BW was reduced due to a decreased food intake in the Orx + RAL group and due a reduced visceral fat weight in the Orx + EN + RAL group. CONCLUSION: The EN + RAL treatment appeared to be promising in preventing male osteoporosis, but given the observed side effects on liver, kidney, and prostate weights, it requires further investigation.

Combination of selective androgen and estrogen receptor modulators in orchiectomized rats.

PURPOSE: Selective androgen and estrogen receptor modulators, ostarine (OST) and raloxifen (RAL), reportedly improve muscle tissue and offer therapeutic approaches to muscle maintenance in the elderly. The present study evaluated the effects of OST and RAL and their combination on musculoskeletal tissue in orchiectomized rats. METHODS: Eight-month-old Sprague Dawley rats were analyzed. Experiment I: (1) Untreated non-orchiectomized rats (Non-ORX), (2) untreated orchiectomized rats (ORX), (3) ORX rats treated with OST during weeks 0-18 (OST-P), (4) ORX rats treated with OST during weeks 12-18 (OST-T). Experiment II: 1) Non-ORX, (2) ORX, 3) OST-P, (4) ORX rats treated with RAL, during weeks 0-18 (RAL-P), 5) ORX rats treated with OST + RAL, weeks 0-18 (OST + RAL-P). The average daily doses of OST and RAL were 0.4 and 7 mg/kg body weight (BW). Weight, fiber size, and capillarization of muscles, gene expression, serum markers and the lumbar vertebral body were analyzed. RESULTS: OST-P exerted favorable effects on muscle weight, expression of myostatin and insulin growth factor-1, but increased prostate weight. OST-T partially improved muscle parameters, showing less effect on the prostate. RAL-P did not show anabolic effects on muscles but improved body constitution by reducing abdominal area, food intake, and BW. OST + RAL-P had an anabolic impact on muscle, reduced androgenic effect on the prostate, and normalized food intake. OST and RAL improved osteoporotic bone. CONCLUSIONS: The OST + RAL treatment appeared to be a promising option in the treatment of androgen-deficient conditions and showed fewer side effects than the respective single treatments.

[Complication rate after femoral shaft fractures in childhood and adolescence depending on patient factors and treatment measures]. / Die Komplikationsrate nach Femurschaftfrakturen im Kindes- und Jugendalter in Abhängigkeit von Patientenfaktoren und Behandlungsmaßnahmen.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures has undergone an increasing change in recent years. The previously predominant treatment procedures were extensively replaced by minimally invasive techniques (e.g. elastic stable intramedullary nailing, ESIN). The aim of this study was the comparison of complication rates depending on patient factors as well as various treatment procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study involved a retrospective X­ray morphometric evaluation of data. The patient files and X­rays of 101 children who were treated at 2 level I trauma centers were analyzed. RESULTS: Conservative treatment was carried out in 19% of the cases. Among the surgical procedures the ESIN technique was predominant (n = 60). Complications that needed revision occurred in 10% of the children after conservative treatment. Revision surgery had to be carried out in more than 6% of the cases in children who were surgically treated. Among the surgical procedures ESIN stabilization demonstrated the lowest revision rate with only 3%. Children under three years and adolescents had a higher risk for developing complications. If the ESIN wires used were too thin in relation to the diameter of the medullary cavity there was an increased probability of complications of around 30%. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a moderate risk of complications in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children. The risk of complications after external fixation and conservative treatment was the highest in this study. Overall, the ESIN technique showed the lowest risk of complications. The results of this study could confirm the known limitations of the ESIN technique depending on age and body weight.

C-reactive protein in spinal surgery: more predictive than prehistoric.

PURPOSE: In spinal surgery, surgical site infections (SSI) after dorsal spondylodesis lead to severe short- and long-term complications. Despite various clinical and serological evidence, the detection of a postoperative SSI remains crucial. In this retrospective cohort study, we determined the prognostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics after open reduction and dorsal spondylodesis in the development of a SSI. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 192 patients from 2016 to 2018 undergoing open reduction and dorsal spondylodesis with and without SSI for 20 days at a level-I trauma center and assessed their serological and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: On day 7 and 8 after surgery, patients who developed a SSI displayed significantly higher CRP levels. A second peak after the initial maximum of CRP and a restricted failure to decline as well as a maximum CRP of more than 225 mg/l predict an infectious complication with a sensitivity of 92.9%, and a specificity of 78.2%. A binary logistic regression leads to 85.7% and 69.7%, respectively. A one-phase decay exponential regression can predict 75.6% of the variance after the initial peak of CRP. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a high value of postoperative CRP kinetics in SSI detection after dorsal spondylodesis. Moreover, we observed typical CRP levels with a specific course as indicative predictors that may facilitate an early SSI detection in clinical practice.

[Laparoscopic resection of a giant colon diverticulum : Case report and review of the literature]. / Laparoskopische Resektion eines Riesenkolondivertikels : Fallbericht und Literaturübersicht.

BACKGROUND: Giant diverticula are rare complications of diverticular disease. Current opinion regards operative therapy as the method of choice for the treatment of symptomatic giant diverticula; however, there is neither consensus about the technique nor about the necessary extent of resection. Based on a non-systematic review of the literature, an overview of giant diverticula in terms of epidemiology, pathology and classification is given. The current case is considered with respect to appropriate diagnostic procedures and possible therapeutic options. CASE PRESENTATION: An 80-year-old female patient presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain and dyspnea. A computed tomography scan showed a large gas-filled structure in the upper left abdomen adjacent to the left colon. A giant colonic diverticulum was suspected and laparoscopy was performed. Intraoperatively, the diagnosis of a giant colon diverticulum located at the splenic flexure was confirmed. An unremarkable diverticulosis only was found in the descending colon. The giant diverticulum was treated by an atypical colon wedge resection and the postoperative course was uneventful. DISCUSSION: This case report describes a laparoscopic atypical colon wedge resection as treatment of a giant colon diverticulum. Only four laparoscopic bowel resections in terms of sigmoid resections or hemicolectomy with primary anastomosis have been reported. Minimally invasive surgery can be a valuable alternative to open procedures. In the current case a laparoscopic atypical colon wedge resection was safely performed. This option might be considered as an alternative to extended resections of giant diverticula. Localization of the giant diverticulum and the simultaneous existence of diverticular disease are the main criteria for the decision between the different operative approaches.