Evolving microbial patterns of acute mastoiditis in pediatric patients undergoing mastoidectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the microbial patterns and clinical outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing mastoidectomy for acute coalescent mastoiditis and to identify factors associated with poor outcomes and/or prolonged treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Monocentric retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral pediatric hospital in Indiana. METHODS: By cross-referencing database data from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) querying for all inpatient stays (patients younger than eighteen) with a diagnostic code of mastoiditis between January 1st, 2010 and August 31, 2019, and the electronic health record (Cerner) for Riley Hospital for Children, 46 patients with mastoidectomy were included. A two-tailed T-test was used to evaluate continuous parametric data. Statistical significance was determined as P < 0.05. For continuous variables, data was analyzed using continuous logistic regression. A criteria of p > 0.1 was used for inclusion in the multivariate regression. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria was met by 46 patients. From 2010 to 2019, S. pyogenes and S. pneumoniae were the most common bacteria, each isolated in 11 of 42 bacterial isolates (26.2%). There was no growth in 35.4% (17/48) of intra-operative wound cultures. On univariate analysis, patients with negative cultures had longer length of hospital stay (LOS) (7.7 days [6.5] vs. 4.3 [2.8]; p = 0.018) as well as higher rates of PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) placement (53.3% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.021). There was a statistically significant difference in terms of gender (p = 0.021), with 15 males and 16 females in the positive culture cohort and 13 males and 2 females in the negative culture cohort. On multivariate analysis, which included gender, PICC placement, both intracranial and extracranial complications, duration of antibiotics, and LOS, female gender was the only significant predictor of positive culture status (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: S. pyogenes and S. pneumoniae were the predominant etiologic agents in acute coalescent mastoiditis between 2010 and 2019, and negative wound cultures were associated with worse clinical outcomes.

The Effect of Diabetes Mellitus on Post-Operative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and its associated immune dysfunction are well-studied risk factors for adverse surgical outcomes. The literature regarding endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is less robust and there have been conflicting reports on post-operative complications and surgical results in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes after ESS via rates of post-operative medical intervention in the first 6 months after surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 176 subjects who underwent ESS from 2015 to 2019 at a single institution by 2 fellowship-trained rhinologists. Subjects were divided into 2 groups, those with a documented Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >6.5 or diagnosis of DM and those with HbA1C < 6.5. Patient age, demographics, 6-month preoperative HbA1c, surgical status and extent, and 6-monthpostoperative need for steroids and/or antibiotics were collected. RESULTS: Out of n = 176 total patients, n = 39 (22.2%) were categorized into the DM group, which were older (46.4 vs 53.8 years, P = .004) and higher proportion of white patients (89.7% vs 68.6%, P = .008). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in proportion of revision surgery, surgical extent, and post-operative use of antibiotics or steroids. When including all variables in binary logistic regression for use of postoperative antibiotics or steroids, the only significant variable predicting these outcomes was the extent of surgical resection including sphenoid sinus (P = .001, OR [95% CI] = 4.02 [1.73-9.34]) or frontal sinus (P < .001, OR [95% CI = 9.86 [4.00-24.33]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DM do not appear to have worse post-operative outcomes outside of the initial 6-month postoperative period.

Are There Real-world Benefits to Bimodal Listening?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefits of bimodal listening (i.e., addition of contralateral hearing aid) for cochlear implant (CI) users on real-world tasks involving high-talker variability speech materials, environmental sounds, and self-reported quality of life (quality of hearing) in listeners' own best-aided conditions. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study between groups. SETTING: Outpatient hearing clinic. PATIENTS: Fifty experienced adult CI users divided into groups based on normal daily listening conditions (i.e., best-aided conditions): unilateral CI (CI), unilateral CI with contralateral HA (bimodal listening; CIHA), or bilateral CI (CICI). INTERVENTION: Task-specific measures of speech recognition with low (Harvard Standard Sentences) and high (Perceptually Robust English Sentence Test Open-set corpus) talker variability, environmental sound recognition (Familiar Environmental Sounds Test-Identification), and hearing-related quality of life (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test group differences among CI, CIHA, and CICI conditions. RESULTS: No group effect was observed for speech recognition with low or high-talker variability, or hearing-related quality of life. Bimodal listeners demonstrated a benefit in environmental sound recognition compared with unilateral CI listeners, with a trend of greater benefit than the bilateral CI group. There was also a visual trend for benefit on high-talker variability speech recognition. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide evidence that bimodal listeners demonstrate stronger environmental sound recognition compared with unilateral CI listeners, and support the idea that there are additional advantages to bimodal listening after implantation other than speech recognition measures, which are at risk of being lost if considering bilateral implantation.

Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology-The state of translation.

While tissue engineering holds significant potential to address current limitations in reconstructive surgery of the head and neck, few constructs have made their way into routine clinical use. In this review, we aim to appraise the state of head and neck tissue engineering over the past five years, with a specific focus on otologic, nasal, craniofacial bone, and laryngotracheal applications. A comprehensive scoping search of the PubMed database was performed and over 2000 article hits were returned with 290 articles included in the final review. These publications have addressed the hallmark characteristics of tissue engineering (cellular source, scaffold, and growth signaling) for head and neck anatomical sites. While there have been promising reports of effective tissue engineered interventions in small groups of human patients, the majority of research remains constrained to in vitro and in vivo studies aimed at furthering the understanding of the biological processes involved in tissue engineering. Further, differences in functional and cosmetic properties of the ear, nose, airway, and craniofacial bone affect the emphasis of investigation at each site. While otolaryngologists currently play a role in tissue engineering translational research, continued multidisciplinary efforts will likely be required to push the state of translation towards tissue-engineered constructs available for routine clinical use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Quantitative Assessment of Surgical Ergonomics in Otolaryngology.

OBJECTIVES: Objective evaluation of the ergonomic risk of common otolaryngology procedures and assessment of work-related musculoskeletal pain and injury. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional intraoperative assessment and survey. SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology at a tertiary children's hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixteen otolaryngology attendings, fellows, and residents participated in a blinded study. Intraoperative ergonomics was assessed for tonsillectomies, adenoidectomies, and tympanostomy tube insertions using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Follow-up surveys were sent to all participating surgeons to determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and formal ergonomic training. RESULTS: Zero percent (N = 0/275) of intraoperative observations were found to have a negligible level of ergonomic risk, with 47% low risk, 37% high risk, and 16% very high risk. Tympanostomy tube insertions conferred less risk than tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, while the use of headlamp or loupes conferred increased risk. Eighty percent of respondents reported having musculoskeletal pain and 40% reported experiencing pain while operating within the past year. The most common area of pain was the cervical spine. No surgeons reported formal ergonomic training. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates an unacceptable level of ergonomic risk for common procedures in otolaryngology. Furthermore, most participants reported experiencing musculoskeletal pain despite the duration of examined procedures being relatively short. The high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal pain and the lack of ergonomic training in our cohort highlight the need for increased awareness of ergonomics as well as the development of formal ergonomic curricula.

The impact of speaking style on speech recognition in quiet and multi-talker babble in adult cochlear implant users.

The current study examined sentence recognition across speaking styles (conversational, neutral, and clear) in quiet and multi-talker babble (MTB) for cochlear implant (CI) users and normal-hearing listeners under CI simulations. Listeners demonstrated poorer recognition accuracy in MTB than in quiet, but were relatively more accurate with clear speech overall. Within CI users, higher-performing participants were also more accurate in MTB when listening to clear speech. Lower performing users' accuracy was not impacted by speaking style. Clear speech may facilitate recognition in MTB for high-performing users, who may be better able to take advantage of clear speech cues.

Topical biomaterials to prevent post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage.

Despite advances in surgical technique, postoperative hemorrhage remains a common cause of mortality and morbidity for patients following tonsillectomy. Application of biomaterials at the time of tonsillectomy can potentially accelerate mucosal wound healing and eliminate the risk of post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage (PTH). To understand the current state and identify possible routes for the development of the ideal biomaterials to prevent PTH, topical biomaterials for eliminating the risk of PTH were reviewed. Alternative topical biomaterials that hold the potential to reduce the risk of PTH were also summarized.