Histological and biochemical evaluation of plasma rich in growth factors treatment for grade II muscle injuries in sheep.

The purpose of this study was to perform a histological and biochemical evaluation of the influence of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) on muscle regeneration process after a surgically induced grade II muscle laceration. A randomized, single blind, controlled experimental research was conducted including twenty-one adult healthy sheep, randomly divided in three groups (n = 7). A grade II surgical section was performed in the biceps femoris muscle of both hindlimbs. After two days (basal time), intralesional infiltration of autologous PRGF or Saline solution was randomly administered in both hindlimbs. Treatment was repeated once a week. Animal groups were euthanized at 1 (T1), 2 (T2) or 4 (T4) weeks. Histological assessment showed that PRGF intralesional injection induced a significant decrease of inflammatory cells density, significant higher centrally nucleated fibers percentage and significantly smaller fibrotic areas compared to Saline-treated muscles at T1, T2 and T4. Also, lower vascular density, with lower capillaries cross-sectional area, in PRGF group compared to Saline was observed. Biochemical analysis revealed a significant higher expression level of MYOD1, MYF5 and MYOG genes in PRGF groups at T1 compared to Saline treated muscles. At ultrastructural level, PRGF groups presented scarce edema and loss of connective tissue structure, as well as higher mitochondrial density adequately associated to the sarcomere unit in contrast to the Saline group. In conclusion, histological, biochemical, and ultrastructural results showed that PRGF treatment improved muscle regeneration process leading to more mature histological aspect in newly formed muscle tissue after a surgically induced grade II muscle injury.

Comparison of the cardiopulmonary parameters after induction of anaesthesia with alphaxalone or etomidate in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cardiorespiratory effects and quality of induction of and recovery from anaesthesia following etomidate or alphaxalone-HPCD IV. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized 'blinded' cross-over study. Twenty-four hours was allowed between phases. ANIMALS: Eight healthy adult Beagles (four male, four female). METHODS: Dogs were anaesthetized with sevoflurane for instrumentation, then allowed to awake. They then received etomidate (treatment E) or alphaxalone-HPCD (treatment A) intravenously to effect. Heart rate (HR), body temperature, invasive arterial pressures (AP), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), stroke volume index, cardiac index (CI), contractility, respiratory rate, central venous pressure, and capnometry were obtained before anaesthetic induction (baseline), 30 seconds and 1 minute after induction, after intubation, one minute after intubation, and for every 5 minutes afterwards until the dog began to swallow and the trachea was extubated. Arterial bloods were taken for analyses before induction, after intubation and every 10 minutes thereafter. The dogs breathed room air. The quality of induction of and recovery from anaesthesia were scored categorically. Statistical analyses used anova for repeated measures, paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank-test as relevant. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The induction doses required were (mean ± SD) 2.91 ± 0.41 mg kg(-1) and 4.15 ± 0.7 mg kg(-1) for treatment E and A respectively. No significant changes in cardiovascular parameters were observed with treatment E. Treatment A resulted in statistically significant increases in HR and CI and reductions of APs and SVRI. Time to extubation was longer with treatment A (25 ± 7 minutes) than with treatment E (17 ± 4 minutes). Dogs became hypoxic with both treatments. The quality of induction and recovery were excellent with treatment A, but significantly less satisfactory with treatment E (recovery score, treatment E median 1, range 0-2; treatment A median 0, range 0-1). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Alphaxalone-HPCD caused significant tachycardia and increase in CI, and statistically (but not clinically) significant decreases in APs and SVRI. Etomidate caused no statistically significant cardiovascular changes. Quality of recovery was better with alfaxalone-HPCD. Both agents caused short-lived hypoxia, and oxygen supplementation is advisable.