RESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Cuidados Críticos/ética , Muerte Encefálica , Hipertensión Intracraneal , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Vendajes de Compresión , Consentimiento Presumido/éticaRESUMEN
This study examined health professionals' (HPs) experience, beliefs and attitudes towards brain death (BD) and two types of donation after circulatory death (DCD)--controlled and uncontrolled DCD. Five hundred and eighty-seven HPs likely to be involved in the process of organ procurement were interviewed in 14 hospitals with transplant programs in France, Spain and the US. Three potential donation scenarios--BD, uncontrolled DCD and controlled DCD--were presented to study subjects during individual face-to-face interviews. Our study has two main findings: (1) In the context of organ procurement, HPs believe that BD is a more reliable standard for determining death than circulatory death, and (2) While the vast majority of HPs consider it morally acceptable to retrieve organs from brain-dead donors, retrieving organs from DCD patients is much more controversial. We offer the following possible explanations. DCD introduces new conditions that deviate from standard medical practice, allow procurement of organs when donors' loss of circulatory function could be reversed, and raises questions about "death" as a unified concept. Our results suggest that, for many HPs, these concerns seem related in part to the fact that a rigorous brain examination is neither clinically performed nor legally required in DCD. Their discomfort could also come from a belief that irreversible loss of circulatory function has not been adequately demonstrated. If DCD protocols are to achieve their full potential for increasing organ supply, the sources of HPs' discomfort must be further identified and addressed.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Muerte Encefálica/diagnóstico , Muerte , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Adulto , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , España , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/normas , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Alireza Bagheri supports a policy on organ procurement where individuals could choose their own definition of death between two or more socially accepted alternatives. First, we claim that such a policy, without any criterion to distinguish accepted from acceptable definitions, easily leads to the slippery slope that Bagheri tries to avoid. Second, we suggest that a public discussion about the circumstances under which the dead donor rule could be violated is more productive of social trust than constantly moving the line between life and death.
