Clinical Outcomes of a Bi-Aspheric Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens.

Purpose: To assess refractive and visual outcomes post-cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of a bi-aspheric diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: A total of 24 patients who underwent bilateral implantation with the Asqelio Trifocal IOL TFLIO130C were evaluated at the 6 months postoperative mark. Key outcome measures included refractive error, photopic monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), uncorrected and corrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA, CDIVA) at 60 cm, and uncorrected and corrected near visual acuity (UNVA, CDNVA) at 40 cm. Additionally, monocular and binocular CDNVA were assessed under mesopic conditions. Monocular and binocular defocus curves, and binocular contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions, with and without glare, were measured. Catquest-9SF and visual symptoms questionnaires were also administered. Results: Postoperative average values of binocular logMAR photopic CDVA, photopic CDIVA, photopic CDNVA and mesopic CDNVA were -0.01±0.06, 0.03±0.09, 0.02±0.05 and 0.19±0.13, respectively. About 100% of patients showed cumulative CDVA and CDNVA ≥20/25, and CDIVA ≥20/32. The average absolute depth-of-focus was about 4.50D. The average postoperative spherical equivalent was 0.05±0.30D and 100% and 93.75% eyes were within ±1.00D and ±0.50D, respectively. Contrast sensitivity was either within or above normal levels under both photopic and mesopic conditions, both with and without glare, except for 12 cpd under mesopic conditions with glare where the mean falls just below the normal range. Questionnaires revealed that 87.5% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with their vision after the surgery, and higher percentages for no difficulty in performing different activities, ranging from 70.83% to 95.83%, were reported. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the bi-aspheric diffractive trifocal IOL yields very good visual performance across distances, fostering high satisfaction levels and minimal difficulties in daily activities.

Clinical outcomes of trifocal toric intraocular lenses.

The purpose of this report is to summarize the visual and refractive outcomes of patients with trifocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) implants. A peer-reviewed literature search in different databases was carried out to identify clinical publications reporting outcomes of patients with this type of implant. The analysis considered information on the sample of eyes, type and power of the trifocal toric IOLs, biometric preoperative data, postoperative refraction, rotational stability, visual acuity at different distances and other analyses undertaken, such as contrast sensitivity or quality of vision questionnaires. 20 clinical studies, encompassing a total of 1404 eyes implanted with three commercially available trifocal toric IOLs, were included in this review. The analysis assessed the outcomes reported for the AT LISA tri toric 939MP IOL, involving 3 articles and 313 eyes; the FineVision toric POD FT IOL, with 7 articles studying 370 eyes, and the AcrySof IQ PanOptix toric IOL, involving 11 articles and 721 eyes. Our assessment of the outcomes of the various studies indicates that the efficacy of the refractive correction (both sphere and cylinder) and visual acuity at different distances was similar between the IOL models. The same was found for the patients' quality of vision and satisfaction levels, in addition to photic phenomena reported. The outcomes summarized in this report lead us to conclude that the use of trifocal toric IOLs allows complete visual restoration over a wide range of distances.

Agreement of predicted intraocular lens power using swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry.

PURPOSE: To analyze the agreement of the predicted intraocular lens (IOL) power obtained with ANTERION, IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL biometers. METHODS: We calculated the monofocal and trifocal IOL power using the SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II and Hoffer Q formulas for 106 eyes. IOL power agreement between devices was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: We found significant differences between biometers comparisons (p < 0.001). ANTERION and IOLMaster 700 did not produce significant IOL power differences (p > 0.05), with the same outcomes for medium- and long-eyes. No significant differences were found using the SRK/T, Haigis, or Hoffer Q formulas for short-eyes (p > 0.1). However, Barrett Universal II formula produced significant differences (p < 0.05) and these differences lay between the ANTERION and Pentacam AXL. ANTERION versus IOLMaster 700 comparison showed limits of agreement (LoA) varying from 1.1071D in SRK/T monofocal medium-eyes to 1.6828D in Hoffer Q trifocal all-eyes. The largest LoA (about 3.0D) was found for short-eyes when comparing the Pentacam AXL with the other two devices. CONCLUSIONS: These devices provided statistically significant but clinically insignificant mean differences in predicted IOL power. However, wide LoA values suggest that for specific eyes these outcomes could be clinically significant.

Enhanced Monofocal Extended Depth of Focus IOL With a Diffractive Surface Design.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive and visual outcomes following cataract surgery and implantation of a new enhanced monofocal extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Fifty eyes of 25 consecutive patients who underwent implantation of the xact Mono-EDoF IOL (Santen Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd) were enrolled in this study. Main outcome measures were refractive error and monocular corrected (CDVA) and uncorrected (UDVA) distance visual acuity values. Monocular visual acuity at different vergences (defocus curve) was obtained. Patients were evaluated at 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 1 year of follow-up, all eyes showed a postoperative spherical equivalent within ±1.00 diopters (D) and 95% of eyes within ±0.50 D. The mean postoperative spherical equivalent was -0.15 ± 0.28 D. A total of 88% and 100% of eyes showed UDVA and CDVA of 20/25 or better, respectively. The mean values of UDVA and CDVA (Snellen decimal) were 0.94 ± 0.09 (range: 0.70 to 1.00) and 0.99 ± 0.03 (range: 0.79 to 1.00), respectively. Defocus curve showed good visual acuity at distance and intermediate distances with a depth of focus value of 1.25 D. No visual disturbances were reported in the whole sample during the entire follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The current study shows that this EDOF IOL provides good visual performance at far and intermediate distances. The lens may be considered for patients interested in reducing spectacle independence at intermediate distances. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(9):595-600.].

Agreement between intraoperative anterior segment spectral-domain OCT and 2 swept-source OCT biometers.

Purpose: To evaluate the agreement of different biometric parameters obtained using intraoperative spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) based biometers.Methods: 102 eyes were assessed using the intraoperative SD-OCT integrated into the Catalys femtosecond-laser, and the IOLMaster 700 and Anterion SS-OCT-based-biometers. Central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), white-to-white (WTW), and lens thickness (LT) were measured.Results: There were statistically significant differences for CCT, ACD, WTW and LT between devices (p < 0.001). The mean difference for ACD ranged from -0.067 to -0.250 mm, with the largest mean difference being between the IOLMaster 700 and Catalys. CCT mean differences ranged from 7 to 32 µm, with the largest mean difference being between the Anterion and Catalys. For WTW, the comparison between the IOLMaster 700 vs Catalys showed the largest mean difference (0.38 mm). However, the mean differences for LT from all three devices were quite similar, ranging from -0.02 to -0.08 mm.Conclusions: SS-OCT biometers showed good agreement for ACD, CCT, WTW and LT. The SD-OCT showed ACD, CCT and WTW values that do not seem to be interchangeable with the SS-OCT biometers; however, this device did show excellent agreement in the case of LT.

Agreement Between Angle-to-Angle Distance and Aqueous Depth Obtained With Two Different Optical Coherence Tomographers and a Scheimpflug Camera.

PURPOSE: To compare angle-to-angle (ATA) distance and aqueous depth (AQD) readings produced by two different optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices and a Scheimpflug camera. METHODS: ATA distance and AQD were measured in 60 eyes using the Visante time-domain OCT (TD-OCT) (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG), the Anterion swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH), and the Pentacam HR Scheimpflug camera (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH). Moreover, ATA distance was measured along the horizontal and vertical meridians. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement between devices. RESULTS: All three devices did not yield similar horizontal ATA distance: 11.96 ± 0.47 mm (TD-OCT), 11.96 ± 0.42 mm (SS-OCT), and 11.05 ± 0.52 mm (Pentacam). More specifically, the Pentacam yielded significantly smaller values (approximately 0.9 mm, P < .001). Mean vertical ATA distance was 12.61 ± 0.65 and 12 ± 0.65 mm for the TD-OCT and SS-OCT, respectively (P = .983). Vertical ATA distance was significantly larger than horizontal ATA distance for both OCT devices (approximately 0.6 mm, P < .001). The lowest mean difference was found between both OCT devices (0.0068 and -0.0415 mm, for horizontal and vertical meridians, respectively) and the highest between the Pentacam and the two OCT devices (approximately 0.9 mm). As for AQD, inter-device mean values were also statistically significant: 2.89 ± 0.48, 2.82 ± 0.49, and 2.79 ± 0.50 mm, for the TD-OCT, SS-OCT, and Pentacam, respectively (P < .001). Mean differences were similar for the TD-OCT versus SS-OCT and SS-OCT versus Pentacam (approximately 0.02 mm), and larger between the TD-OCT and Pentacam (approximately 0.05 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the TD-OCT and SS-OCT are interchangeable instruments for ATA distance measurement but the Pentacam is not with either of the two OCT devices. A clinical criterion should assess whether these three devices could be used interchangeably for AQD measurement. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(2):133-140.].

Angle-to-angle and spur-to-spur distance analysis with high-resolution optical coherence tomography.

BACKGROUND: To measure angle-to-angle (ATA) and spur-to-spur (STS) distances along six meridians using high-resolution swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and to compare those values with horizontal white-to-white (WTW) distance. METHODS: 68 eyes from 68 patients were quantitatively assessed with the Anterion SS-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). ATA and STS distances were measured with the SS-OCT's B-Scan in six cross-sectional images corresponding to the vertical (6-12 o'clock), 1-7 o'clock, 2-8 o'clock, horizontal (3-9 o'clock), 4-10 o'clock and 5-11 o'clock meridians. WTW was measured horizontally with the device's infrared camera. A Pearson correlation analysis was carried out to compare ATA and STS distances with WTW. RESULTS: The largest values were found for the vertical meridian and the shortest for the 2-8 o'clock meridian, both for ATA and STS distances. No statistically significant differences were found between WTW, ATA and STS along the horizontal meridian (p > 0.1). However, ATA and STS showed statistically significant differences elsewhere, except for the horizontal and the 2-8 o'clock meridians (p > 0.05). Moreover, we found that ATA and STS varied significantly depending on the meridian being assessed, except for ATA at 4-10 versus 3-9 o'clock and for STS at 4-10 versus 3-9 o'clock and at 3-9 versus 2-8 o'clock (p > 0.1). R2 values ranged from 0.49 to 0.75 for ATA and STS at the different meridians, showing the best correlation at 3-9 o'clock meridian (0.64 and 0.75, respectively) and the worst at 6-12 o'clock meridian (R2 = 0.49 for both ATA and STS). CONCLUSIONS: ATA and STS distances vary radially, thus showing that the anterior chamber is vertically oval. Therefore, it is advisable to measure these two distances along the meridian to be used.