Correction to: Prevalent vertebral fractures and minor vertebral deformities analyzed by vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) increases the risk of incident fractures in postmenopausal women: the FRODOS study.

Figure 1 as published in the original version of this article was unfortunately incomplete.

Prevalent vertebral fractures and minor vertebral deformities analyzed by vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) increases the risk of incident fractures in postmenopausal women: the FRODOS study.

The incidence of vertebral fractures (VF) by vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) was 6.6% in postmenopausal women (FRODOS cohort) after 4 years of follow-up, increasing with prevalent VF and minor vertebral deformities, age, lower bone mass, glucocorticoid use, and rheumatoid arthritis. This study supports the usefulness of VFA to identify VF. PURPOSE: Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) is increasingly used to identify spine fractures, but few cohort studies have used this method in prevalence and incidence assessment. We previously reported the prevalence of vertebral fractures (VF) and minor vertebral deformities (MVD) by morphometric VFA in a population-based cohort of postmenopausal women (FRODOS study). Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of VF, the associated risk factors, and particularly the role of MVD in this cohort of subjects. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal analysis of 2510 women aged 59-70 years participating in the FRODOS prevalence study (2006-2009) with evaluable VFA 4 years later. VFA at baseline and in the present study was assessed by quantitative vertebral morphometry and by visual semiquantitative measurement. The multivariate Poisson regression model was performed, and relative risks with confidence interval of 95% were calculated for the incidence of VF. Bone mineral density (BMD) and an osteoporosis questionnaire were collected. RESULTS: Overall, the incidence of VF was 6.6%, increasing with prevalent VF (24.5%) and in women with prevalent MVD (17.7%). Age and low BMD were also associated risk factors as were the presence of rheumatoid arthritis and exposure to glucocorticoids and bisphosphonates. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of prevalent VF assessed by VFA is associated with further incident spinal fractures in postmenopausal women. In addition, having MVD confers an increased risk of new VF.

Disability measured by the modified health assessment questionnaire in early rheumatoid arthritis: prognostic factors after two years of follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the rate and baseline prognostic factors of disability measured by the modified HAQ (MHAQ), in a series of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after two years of therapy with a structured algorithm using disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: One hundred and five patients (81% female) with early RA (disease duration <2 years) treated with the same therapeutic protocol using gold salts and methotrexate in a step-up strategy, together with methylprednisolone (4 mg/day), were followed up for two years. The outcome was the absence of disability (MHAQ=0) after two years of DMARD therapy. Clinical, biological, immunogenetic and radiographic data (Larsen score) were analyzed at study entry and at 12 and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The MHAQ decreased significantly at 6 months after initiation of DMARD therapy and the reduction was maintained at 24 months (mean+/-SD: 0.97+/-0.56 at baseline, 0.51+/- 0.57 at month 6 and 0.45+/-0.5 at month 24). No disability (MHAQ=0) was observed in 26.6% of patients after two years of follow-up. Age, MHAQ>0.5, DAS28>5.1, VAS pain, positive rheumatoid factor and ESR at baseline were associated with disability in the univariate analysis. In the logistic regression analysis, only age (OR: 1.058, 95%CI 1.017; 1.101 p<0.006), rheumatoid factor status (OR: 3.772 95%CI 1.204; 11.813, p<0.02) and MHAQ>0.5 (OR:4.023, 95%CI 1.373; 11.783, p<0.02) were associated with disability (MHAQ>0) at two years. CONCLUSION: In a series of early RA patients treated with a structured algorithm using DMARDs and very low doses of glucocorticoids, no disability was observed in a quarter of patients after two years. Age, rheumatoid factor positivity and MHAQ>0.5 were independent predictors of disability at two years.

Prognostic markers of clinical remission in early rheumatoid arthritis after two years of DMARDs in a clinical setting.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the rate and baseline prognostic factors of clinical remission in a series of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after 2 years of therapy based on a structured algorithm using disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in a clinical setting. To determine whether a good therapeutic response at 6 months of therapy is associated with remission at 2 years. METHODS: One hundred and five patients (81% female) with early RA (disease duration < 2 years) treated with the same therapeutic protocol using gold salts and methotrexate in a step-up strategy, together with methylprednisolone (4 mg/day), were followed up for 2 years. The outcome variable was clinical remission after 2 years of DMARD therapy using the 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28 < 2.6). Clinical, biological, immunogenetic and radiographic data (Larsen score) were analyzed at study entry and after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of follow-up. Therapeutic response was analyzed using the ACR and EULAR criteria. RESULTS: Remission was observed in 34 patients (32.4%) after 2 years of follow-up. A baseline DAS28 score < 5.1 (p = 0.004), hemoglobin (p = 0.04) and male gender (p = 0.02) were associated with remission in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only a DAS28 < 5.1 was associated with remission at 2 years (OR 4.1, 95% CI: 1.56;10.77, p = 0.004). The percentage of ACR50 responses after 6 months was significantly higher in patients with remission at 2 years than in those without (66.7% vs 43.3%; p = 0.04). Similar results were obtained when analyzing the good EULAR response (50% vs 20.9%; p = 0.003). Furthermore, when the therapeutic response at 6 months was included in the logistic regression model, only an ACR50 response (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.14;13.38, p = 0.03) and a good EULAR response (OR 6.23, 95% CI 1.61; 24.04, p = 0.008), but not an ACR20 response or a whole EULAR response were significantly associated with remission. CONCLUSION: In a series of early RA patients treated using a structured algorithm with DMARDs and very low doses of glucocorticoids, clinical remission was observed in one-third of patients after 2 years. Low or moderate disease activity (DAS28 < 5.1) at baseline and a good therapeutic response during the first months of therapy predicts clinical remission at 2 years.

Synovial vascular patterns and angiogenic factors expression in synovial tissue and serum of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether subgroups of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients classified according to their synovial vascular pattern have a different expression of angiogenic mediators or exhibit distinct clinical or biological characteristics. METHODS: Arthroscopies were performed in 27 patients with RA and synovial samples were obtained. Vascular morphology was classified in three patterns: straight (S), tortuous (T) and mixed (M). Immunostaining was performed with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1, anti-VEGFR-2, anti-IL-8 and anti-TGF-beta, and measured by digital image analysis. Serum levels of VEGF, TGF-beta and IL-8, and clinical, radiographic and serological data were also analysed. RESULTS: Eleven (41%) patients had the S pattern, nine (33%) the M pattern and seven (26%) the T pattern. The S and M groups had a higher prevalence of rheumatoid factor positivity and erosive disease, and higher levels of markers of systemic inflammation compared with the T group. Synovial expression of VEGF was higher in the S and T groups compared with the M group, whereas TGF-beta was higher in the T compared with the S and M groups. Distinct synovial distribution of VEGF and TGF-beta between groups was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that RA patients with the S and M patterns share different clinical, biological and serological characteristics compared with those with the T pattern, which may constitute a group with less severe disease. Differences in the intensity and distribution of synovial expression of VEGF and TGF-beta observed between groups could have pathophysiological relevance. However, larger, prospective multicentre studies would be need to determine the clinical relevance of vascular patterns in RA.

Adsorptive granulocyte/monocyte apheresis for the treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis: an open pilot multicentre trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GCAP) in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with active and refractory RA were treated with weekly GCAP sessions using a column filled with acetate beads (Adacolumn) over five consecutive weeks. Clinical assessments and response to therapy were analysed at weeks 5, 7, 12 and 20 in an open multicentre trial. The primary outcome measure of clinical response was 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 20. EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) response criteria, based on the disease activity score for 28 joints (DAS28) and disability using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 27 patients, 81.5% were women with mean disease duration of 14.4 yr. The mean number of previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) was 3.7, and 48.1% of patients had previously failed on biologicals. On an intention-to-treat basis, 40.7% of patients achieved an ACR20 and 44.4% a therapeutic EULAR response at week 20. These percentages were 50 and 54.5% in 22 patients who completed the trial. In the 10 completers who had previously failed on biologicals, an ACR response was achieved in four patients (ACR20, two; ACR50, one; ACR70, one). A significant decrease was recorded in different ACR response components, including the tender joint and swollen joint counts, pain score and patient and physician global disease assessments, as well as the DAS28 index; most of them improved after week 5. ESR and CRP, but not the HAQ score, had decreased significantly at week 20. The treatment was well tolerated and only one serious adverse event related to the study procedure was documented (sepsis due to a catheter infection). CONCLUSIONS: GCAP treatment led to significant clinical improvement in a subset of patients with RA who had failed to respond to DMARDs or biologicals. Further large, placebo-controlled studies are warranted to fully assess the therapeutic value of GCAP for refractory RA.

p53 expression in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis synovial tissue and association with joint damage.

BACKGROUND: Overexpression and functional mutations of p53 have been found in the synovial tissue (ST) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but their clinical significance remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyse p53 expression in the ST of patients with RA and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and its association with joint damage. METHODS: Synovial biopsy specimens were obtained by arthroscopy in 45 patients (27 RA, 18 PsA). Radiographs of hands, feet, and the joint undergoing arthroscopy were obtained to evaluate the presence of erosive disease. Synovial cell populations were analysed using CD4, CD8, CD138, CD20, and CD68 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The p53 protein was determined by immunohistology using DO7 mAb in 34 patients (18 RA, 16 PsA). In 11 patients with early RA, the association between p53 and 1 year progression of radiographic damage was analysed using the Larsen-Scott method. RESULTS: The p53 protein was detected in 16/18 (89%) patients with RA and in 9/16 (56%) patients with PsA, but its expression in RA was significantly higher than in PsA. In RA, p53 expression was significantly associated with erosive disease, and its scores were higher in patients with radiological progression. CD68 expression was also associated with erosions and radiological progression in RA. No association was found between either p53 or CD68 and erosive disease in PsA. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that p53 ST overexpression and association with joint damage is characteristic of RA rather than PsA, and that p53 ST expression might be a prognostic marker of joint damage in RA.