RESUMEN
Background: Intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is usually treated by a combination of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and a short course of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). ADT is associated with multiple side effects, including weight gain, loss of libido, and hot flashes. In contrast, anti-androgen monotherapy is generally better tolerated in spite of higher rates of gynecomastia. Objective: This study assessed the effectiveness of enzalutamide monotherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT (Hypo-EBRT) for treating intermediate risk prostate cancer. Method: This trial was a multicenter, open-label phase II study of 6 months of enzalutamide monotherapy combined with Hypo-EBRT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Hypo-EBRT was initiated 8-12 weeks after initiating enzalutamide. The primary endpoint was PSA decline >80% measured at the 25th week of enzalutamide administration. Secondary end-points included assessment of toxicity, changes in anthropomorphic body measurements, sexual hormones, and metabolic changes. Results: Sixty-two patients were included in the study from January 2018 to February 2020. A PSA decline of >80% was observed in all evaluable patients at the end of enzalutamide treatment and 92% achieved PSA values under 0.1 ngr/ml. All patients remain in PSA response (<80% reduction of the initial values) 6 months after the end of enzalutamide treatment. The most frequent adverse events were hypertension, asthenia, and gynecomastia. There were no significant changes in bone density, body mass index (BMI), or patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Conclusion: Enzalutamide monotherapy is very effective along with hEBRT in reducing PSA levels for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the potential use of this combination in future randomized trials.
RESUMEN
Background: Chronic pain secondary to treatment in cancer survivors without tumor evidence is not unusual. Its management often requires specific approaches that are different from those applied for cancer patients with advanced disease and short life expectancy. Some studies have described clinical benefit with ozone therapy (O3T) in the management of pain and side effects secondary to cancer treatment. Objective: We present our preliminary experience with O3T in the management of refractory pelvic pain syndromes secondary to cancer treatment. Design: Case series. Subjects and Methods: Six cancer patients (without tumor evidence) who had been treated previously with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or endoscopic procedures and were suffering persistent or severe pelvic pain (median 14 months) received O3T using ozone-oxygen gas mixture insufflation as a complementary therapy in addition to their scheduled conventional treatment. Results: All cases, except one, showed clinically relevant pain improvement. Visual analog scale score with the standard treatment was 7.8 ± 2.1 before O3T, 4.3 ± 3.4 (p = 0.049) after one month, 3.3 ± 3.7 (p = 0.024) after two months, and 2.8 ± 3.8 (p = 0.020) after three months of O3T. The median value of "pain symptom" according to the U.S. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 5.0 showed a decrease from 3 (range: 2-3) to 1 (range: 0-3) (p = 0.046). Conclusions: Following unsuccessful conventional treatments, O3T provided significant benefit in our patients with refractory pelvic pain secondary to cancer treatment. These results merit further evaluation in blinded, randomized clinical trials.
