Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
8.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 33(1): 37-44, 2023 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35416154

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), which is characterized by partial loss of smell (hyposmia) or total loss of smell (anosmia), is commonly associated with asthma and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD). CRSwNP worsens disease severity and quality of life. The objective of this real-world study was to determine whether biological treatments prescribed for severe asthma can improve olfaction in patients with CRSwNP. A further objective was to compare the improvement in in olfaction in N-ERD and non-N-ERD subgroups. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, noninterventional, retrospective, observational study of 206 patients with severe asthma and CRSwNP undergoing biological treatment (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, or reslizumab). RESULTS: Olfaction improved after treatment with all 4 monoclonal antibodies (omalizumab [35.8%], mepolizumab [35.4%], reslizumab [35.7%], and benralizumab [39.1%]), with no differences between the groups. Olfaction was more likely to improve in patients with atopy, more frequent use of short-course systemic corticosteroids, and larger polyp size. The proportion of patients whose olfaction improved was similar between the N-ERD (37%) and non-N-ERD (35.7%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first real-world study to compare improvement in olfaction among patients undergoing long-term treatment with omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, or benralizumab for severe asthma and associated CRSwNP. Approximately 4 out of 10 patients reported a subjective improvement in olfaction (with nonsignificant differences between biologic drugs). No differences were found for improved olfaction between the N-ERD and non-N-ERD groups.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Productos Biológicos , Pólipos Nasales , Rinitis , Sinusitis , Humanos , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Pólipos Nasales/complicaciones , Pólipos Nasales/tratamiento farmacológico , Olfato , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Anosmia/complicaciones , Anosmia/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Asma/complicaciones , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Sinusitis/complicaciones , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Crónica , Rinitis/complicaciones , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológico
15.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 32(6): 471-478, 2022 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34489228

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition of the airways with a complex pathophysiology. Stratification of asthma subtypes into phenotypes and endotypes should move the field forward, making treatment more effective and personalized. Eosinophils are the key inflammatory cells involved in severe eosinophilic asthma. Given the health threat posed by eosinophilic asthma, there is a need for reliable biomarkers to identify affected patients and treat them properly with novel biologics. microRNAs (miRNAs) are a promising diagnostic tool. The aim of this study was to identify serum miRNAs that can phenotype asthma patients. METHODS: Serum miRNAs of patients with eosinophilic asthma (N=40) and patients with noneosinophilic asthma (N=36) were evaluated using next-generation sequencing, specifically miRNAs-seq, and selected miRNAs were validated using RT-qPCR. Pathway enrichment analysis of deregulated miRNAs was performed. RESULTS: Next-generation sequencing revealed 15 miRNAs that were expressed differentially between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma patients, although no differences were observed in the miRNome between atopic and nonatopic asthma patients. Of the 15 miRNAs expressed differentially between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma patients, hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and hsa-miR-376a-3p were validated by RT-qPCR. Expression levels of these 2 miRNAs were higher in eosinophilic than in noneosinophilic asthma patients. Furthermore, expression values of hsa-miR-26a-1-3p correlated inversely with peripheral blood eosinophil count, and hsa-miR-376a-3p expression values correlated with FeNO values and the number of exacerbations. Additionally, in silico pathway enrichment analysis revealed that these 2 miRNAs regulate signaling pathways associated with the pathogenesis of asthma. CONCLUSIONS: hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and hsa-miR-376a-3p could be used to differentiate between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma.


Asunto(s)
Asma , MicroARNs , Humanos , MicroARNs/genética , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Biomarcadores , Fenotipo , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/genética
17.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 32(6): 471-478, 2022. graf
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-213398

RESUMEN

Background: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition of the airways with a complex pathophysiology. Stratification of asthma subtypes into phenotypes and endotypes should move the field forward, making treatment more effective and personalized. Eosinophils are the key inflammatory cells involved in severe eosinophilic asthma. Given the health threat posed by eosinophilic asthma, there is a need for reliable biomarkers to identify affected patients and treat them properly with novel biologics. microRNAs (miRNAs) are a promising diagnostic tool. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify serum miRNAs that can phenotype asthma patients. Methods: Serum miRNAs of patients with eosinophilic asthma (N=40) and patients with noneosinophilic asthma (N=36) were evaluated using next-generation sequencing, specifically miRNAs-seq, and selected miRNAs were validated using RT-qPCR. Pathway enrichment analysis of deregulated miRNAs was performed. Results: Next-generation sequencing revealed 15 miRNAs that were expressed differentially between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma patients, although no differences were observed in the miRNome between atopic and nonatopic asthma patients. Of the 15 miRNAs expressed differentially between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma patients, hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and hsa-miR-376a-3p were validated by RT-qPCR. Expression levels of these 2 miRNAs were higher in eosinophilic than in noneosinophilic asthma patients. Furthermore, expression values of hsa-miR-26a-1-3p correlated inversely with peripheral blood eosinophil count, and hsa-miR-376a-3p expression values correlated with FeNO values and the number of exacerbations. Additionally, in silico pathway enrichment analysis revealed that these 2 miRNAs regulate signaling pathways associated with the pathogenesis of asthma. Conclusion: hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and hsa-miR-376a-3p could be used to differentiate between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , MicroARNs/sangre , Asma/sangre , Asma/genética , Fenotipo , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes
19.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 31(2): 94-107, 2021 Apr 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32540792

RESUMEN

Eosinophils were discovered more than 140 years ago. These polymorphonuclear leukocytes have a very active metabolism and contain numerous intracellular secretory granules that enable multiple effects on both health and disease status. Classically, eosinophils have been considered important immune cells in the pathogenesis of inflammatory processes (eg, parasitic helminth infections) and allergic or pulmonary diseases (eg, asthma) and are always associated with a type 2 immune response. Furthermore, in recent years, eosinophils have been linked to the immune response by conferring host protection against fungi, bacteria, and viruses, which they recognize through several molecules, such as toll-like receptors and the retinoic acid-inducible gene 1-like receptor. The immune protection provided by eosinophils is exerted through multiple mechanisms and properties. Eosinophils contain numerous cytoplasmatic granules that release cationic proteins, cytokines, chemokines, and other molecules, all of which contribute to their functioning. In addition to the competence of eosinophils as effector cells, their capabilities as antigen-presenting cells enable them to act in multiple situations, thus promoting diverse aspects of the immune response. This review summarizes various aspects of eosinophil biology, with emphasis on the mechanisms used and roles played by eosinophils in host defence against viral infections and response to vaccines. The review focuses on respiratory viruses, such as the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/inmunología , Eosinófilos/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2 , Animales , Humanos
20.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 31(2): 94-107, 2021. ilus
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-215182

RESUMEN

Eosinophils were discovered more than 140 years ago. These polymorphonuclear leukocytes have a very active metabolism and contain numerous intracellular secretory granules that enable multiple effects on both health and disease status. Classically, eosinophils have been considered important immune cells in the pathogenesis of inflammatory processes (eg, parasitic helminth infections) and allergic or pulmonary diseases (eg, asthma) and are always associated with a type 2 immune response. Furthermore, in recent years, eosinophils have been linked to the immune response by conferring host protection against fungi, bacteria, and viruses, which they recognize through several molecules, such as toll-like receptors and the retinoic acid–inducible gene 1–like receptor. The immune protection provided by eosinophils is exerted through multiple mechanisms and properties. Eosinophils contain numerous cytoplasmatic granules that release cationic proteins, cytokines, chemokines, and other molecules, all of which contribute to their functioning. In addition to the competence of eosinophils as effector cells, their capabilities as antigen-presenting cells enable them to act in multiple situations, thus promoting diverse aspects of the immune response. This review summarizes various aspects of eosinophil biology, with emphasis on the mechanisms used and roles played by eosinophils in host defence against viral infections and response to vaccines. The review focuses on respiratory viruses, such as the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. (AU)


Los eosinófilos fueron descubiertos hace más de 140 años. Este leucocito polimorfonuclear tiene un metabolismo muy activo y contiene numerosos gránulos secretores intracelulares que le permiten ejercer múltiples funciones tanto en el estado no patológico como en el de la enfermedad. Clásicamente, los eosinófilos se han considerado como importantes células inmunes en la patogénesis de procesos inflamatorios tales como infecciones parasitarias por helmintos y enfermedades alérgicas y/o pulmonares como el asma, las cuales están asociadas a una respuesta inmune tipo 2. Además, en los últimos años, los eosinófilos también han sido relacionados con la respuesta inmunológica que confiere protección al huésped contra hongos, bacterias y virus, reconociéndolos a través de varias moléculas como los receptores tipo Toll (TLR) o los receptores parecidos al gen inducible por ácido retinoico 1 (RIG-1) o RLR. La protección inmune es ejercida a través de los múltiples mecanismos y propiedades características de estas células. Contienen numerosos gránulos citoplasmáticos que liberan proteínas catiónicas, citocinas, quimiocinas y otras moléculas que contribuyen a estas funciones. Además de su competencia como células efectoras, sus capacidades como célula presentadora de antígeno les permite actuar en múltiples situaciones, promoviendo diversos aspectos de la respuesta inmune. En esta revisión se resumen diversos aspectos de la biología de los eosinófilos y, principalmente, se repasan los mecanismos y funciones que desempeñan estas células en la defensa del huésped contra las infecciones por virus, así como la respuesta desencadenada por las vacunas víricas, focalizando la atención en los virus respiratorios como el nuevo coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anafilaxia/etiología , Mastocitosis , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Coronavirus Relacionado al Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Severo/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos , Coronavirus Relacionado al Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Severo , Anafilaxia/prevención & control , Excipientes/efectos adversos , Triptasas/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...