Rate of periprocedural stroke in diagnostic cerebral angiograms comparing transradial versus transfemoral access.

PURPOSE: Transradial access for neurointerventional procedures has increased in popularity over the past few years due to data from extrapolated interventional cardiology studies, patient preference, and early reports of feasibility using this approach. Our aim was to evaluate the incidence of periprocedural stroke in patients undergoing transradial versus transfemoral access for diagnostic cerebral angiograms. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our neurointerventional database and identified all patients who underwent a diagnostic angiogram between May 2019 and July 2021. Patients were further divided into transradial versus transfemoral access. In patients with postprocedural stroke, symptoms and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score were recorded. Pertinent laboratory values and procedural data was reviewed, including COVID status, platelet count, International normalized ratio (INR), Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), vessels catheterized, amount of contrast used, and fluoroscopy time. Imaging work-up for stroke symptoms was reviewed, if available. RESULTS: Thousand two-hundred thirty eight diagnostic cerebral angiograms with 656 patients (53%) undergoing transradial access. Stroke symptoms after angiogram were only observed in the transradial group (5 patients; 0.4% total and 0.8% among radial access cases, respectively). Symptoms included word finding difficulty, paresthesia, or weakness. Three patients underwent cross-sectional imaging, computed tomography was negative in all three patients. Magnetic resonance imaging showed small, scattered infarcts in two patients. All symptoms resolved without additional hospitalization. CONCLUSION: In our experience, using transradial access for diagnostic cerebral angiograms was associated with a low but not negligible incidence of periprocedural strokes. Patient anatomy should be evaluated prior to selection of vascular access. Patients should be made aware of a slightly higher periprocedural stroke risk with transradial access.

Middle meningeal artery: An effective pathway for achieving complete obliteration following transarterial Ethylene Vinyl Copolymer (Onyx) embolization of dural arteriovenous fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: Transarterial Onyx embolization is the mainstay of intracranial non-cavernous dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) treatment. Although the dural arterial supply varies depending on the location, the impact of arterial access on treatment outcomes has remained unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize factors as sociated with complete obliteration following transarterial Onyx embolization, with a special focus on arterial access routes and dAVF location. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the patients who underwent transarterial Onyx embolization for intracranial dAVFs at two academic institutions was performed. Patients with angiographic follow-up were considered eligible to investigate the impact of the arterial access on achieving complete obliteration. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients underwent transarterial Onyx embolization of intracranial dAVFs. Complete obliteration was achieved in 65% of all treated patients and in 75% of those with cortical venous reflux. Multivariable analysis identified middle meningeal artery (MMA) access to be a significant independent predictive factor for complete obliteration (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.06-5.06; p=0.034). Subgroup analysis showed that supratentorial and lateral cerebellar convexity dAVFs (OR, 5.72, 95% CI, 1.89-17.33, p=0.002), and Borden type III classification at pre-treatment (OR, 3.13, 95% CI, 1.05- 9.35, p=0.041), were independent predictive factors for complete obliteration following embolization through the MMA. CONCLUSIONS: MMA access is an independent predictive factor for complete obliteration following transarterial Onyx embolization for intracranial non-cavernous dAVFs. It is particularly effective for supratentorial and lateral cerebellar convexity dAVFs and those that are Borden type III.

Role of Surgical Intervention for Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas With Cortical Venous Drainage in an Endovascular Era: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae (dAVFs) with cortical venous drainage (CVD) require treatment because of their aggressive clinical presentation and natural history. Although endovascular treatment is effective for the majority of these lesions in the current endovascular era, surgical management has been required if the lesions are not amenable to or fail endovascular treatments. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the angioarchitecture that may necessitate surgical intervention. METHODS: A retrospective review of the patients with intracranial dAVFs with CVD treated at 2 academic institutions between January 1, 2009, and July 31, 2019 was performed. Patients who required surgical intervention were selected in this study, and angiographic findings were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 81 dAVFs in 80 patients were treated during the study period. Endovascular treatments were attempted for 72 (88.9%) dAVFs, resulting in complete obliteration in 55 (76.4%). Surgical interventions were performed in 18 (22.2%) dAVFs, resulting in complete obliteration in all lesions. Overall, complete obliteration was achieved in 74 (93.7%) of 79 dAVFs with follow-up. In the surgically treated dAVFs, curative transarterial embolization was deterred by the angioarchitecture, which included dominant feeding vessels from the ophthalmic artery, meningohypophyseal trunk, posterior meningeal artery, pial artery, or ascending pharyngeal artery. Drainage through tortuous cortical vein, deep venous system, or isolated sinus made transvenous approach challenging. CONCLUSION: Despite continued improvement in endovascular technology, surgical approaches to dAVFs are still of great value as initial and salvage treatment of dAVFs with angioarchitecture hampering endovascular treatment.

Distal radial artery (snuffbox) access for carotid artery stenting - Technical pearls and procedural set-up.

PURPOSE: To report use of distal radial artery (dRA) access for carotid artery stenting (CAS) and to discuss procedural setup and technical considerations for a successful intervention. METHODS: A retrospective review of our prospective neurointerventional database of CAS was conducted between May 2019 and March 2020. All CAS cases via dRA in the anatomical snuffbox were identified. Patient demographics, clinical information, procedural and radiographic data was collected. RESULTS: 22 CAS procedures in 20 patients via dRA were identified. Patients' mean age was 69.4 years (range 53-87 years). 3 patients were female. Mean radial artery diameter was 2.1 mm (range 1.6-2.8 mm). dRA access was achieved in all cases. Conversion to femoral access was required in 2 cases (9.1%) due to persistent radial artery vasospasm resulting in patient discomfort despite multiple additional doses of intraarterial vasodilators and added intravenous sedation as well as tortuous vessel anatomy and limited support of the catheters in a type 3 aortic arch for left CAS. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary experience with dRA access for CAS suggests this approach to be feasible and safe for patients. Technical considerations are important and preprocedural planning is necessary for a successful intervention. Catheter systems and devices specifically designed for radial access are needed to enable more interventionalists to safely perform neurointerventional procedures via wrist access.

Endovascular techniques for achievement of better flow diverter wall apposition.

Flow diverter malapposition has been described as a technical complication during endovascular procedures and can be associated with, potentially delayed, life-threatening aneurysm rupture or ischemic events. We performed a retrospective review of our flow diverter database to identify all patients in whom device malapposition was detected on follow-up angiogram immediately after device deployment. Feasibility and technical success of different endovascular approaches aiming to correct the inadequate vessel wall apposition were evaluated. Successful endovascular techniques for manipulation of the flow diverter included use of wires, catheters and additional flow diverter/stent devices. In our practice, we found six successful endovascular techniques for device manipulation, which allowed us to safely achieve good flow diverter wall apposition.