Antioxidant Micronutrients and Essential Fatty Acids Supplementation on Cystic Fibrosis Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Antioxidant micronutrients and essential fatty acids supplementation intake appears to have a protective effect in some diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, and asthma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to evaluate the effects of these nutrients on nutritional and clinical outcomes of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: This is a systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in CF. MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for RCTs published from 1948 through February 2019. Two investigators independently reviewed the titles and abstracts and then extracted the data from the included studies using a standardized predesigned form. Two reviewers independently performed the quality assessment of the RCTs according to the Cochrane risk of bias tools. RESULTS: A total of 4,792 studies were identified, and 23 were eligible (8 antioxidant micronutrient and 15 essential fatty acids). The interventions found were beta-carotene, zinc, magnesium, multivitamin, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), linoleic acid and lipid matrix with choline supplementation. A significant improvement was observed in: (a) pulmonary function with magnesium (n=1) and essential fatty acids (n=2) supplementation; (b) less pulmonary exacerbations with beta-carotene (n=1), zinc (n=1), antioxidant-enriched multivitamin (n=1) and essential fatty acids (n=2) supplementation. One study with antioxidant-enriched multivitamin and four studies with EPA/DHA supplementation reported significant reductions in inflammatory markers. Nutritional status was not modified by antioxidants supplementation in any of the studies, while in five studies there was an improvement with fatty acids supplementation. The risk of bias of the majority of the parallel studies was high. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of antioxidants or DHA/EPA supplementation for CF, although observed in some studies, are not consistent enough to recommend routine use of these supplements. The mechanisms of action of these nutrients, dose levels and timing should be further explored in future studies.

Classificação dos alimentos quanto ao processamento industrial: uma revisão bibliográfica / Food classification for industrial processing: a review

Introdução: O processamento artificial de alimentos tem sido considerado um fator de risco importante na saúde. O objetivo deste estudo é revisar a literatura científica quanto à definição da classificação dos alimentos referente ao seu grau de processamento industrial. Métodos: revisão narrativa de artigos publicados nas bases de dados indexadas MEDLINE (PubMed) e LILACS e guias alimentares disponíveis na página online da Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). A estratégia de busca utilizada compreendeu os seguintes descritores: Processed food OR Unprocessed food OR Artisanal food OR Minimally processed food OR Highly processed OR Ultra-processed food OR Industrial food processing. Não houve restrição quanto ao idioma utilizado nas publicações. Resultados: foram identificados 1301 artigos nas bases de dados PubMed e LILACS e 35 na página da FAO. Definições de alimentos processados ou ultraprocessados foram encontradas em diretrizes de apenas 8 dos 34 países avaliados nessa revisão. Apenas três diretrizes eram baseadas na classificação NOVA, utilizada no Brasil. Os demais países que utilizam classificações baseadas no grau de processamento industrial se pautam em definições variadas, baseadas na quantidade de aditivos, açucares, gorduras e outras substâncias. Além disso, apenas quatro países utilizam a classificação de ultraprocessados para alimentos altamente industrializados. Conclusões: apesar dos riscos já evidenciados em relação ao consumo destes alimentos, as evidências demonstram que o conceito em relação ao grau de processamento industrial de alimentos não apresenta uma definição padronizada.

Introduction: artificial food processing has been considered a major health risk factor. The objective of this study is to review the scientific literature regarding the definition of food classification related to its degree of industrial processing. Methods: narrative review. Articles published in MEDLINE (PubMed) and LILACS indexed databases and food guides available on the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) website were evaluated. The search strategy used included the following descriptors: Processed food OR Unprocessed food OR Artisanal food OR Minimally processed food OR Highly processed OR Ultra-processed food OR Industrial food processing. There was no restriction on the language used in the publications. Results: 1301 articles in the PubMed and LILACS databases and 35 on the FAO website were identified. Food classifications based on the degree of industrial processing were found in only 8 of 34 countries included in this review. Of those, only three guidelines were based on the NOVA classification, currently used in Brazil. Other countries with food classifications based on industrial processing used definitions characterized by the addition of sugars, chemical additives, fats and other substances. Furthermore, only four countries used definitions for ultraprocessed foods specifically. Conclusion: the evidence demonstrates the concept in relation to industrial processing does not present a standard definition, despite the risks already evidenced in relation to the consumption of these.