Cardiovascular Testing in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Volume Recovery and Worldwide Comparison.

Purpose: To characterize the recovery of diagnostic cardiovascular procedure volumes in U.S. and non-U.S. facilities in the year following the initial COVID-19 outbreak. Materials and Methods: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) coordinated a worldwide study called the IAEA Noninvasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19 2 (INCAPS COVID 2), collecting data from 669 facilities in 107 countries, including 93 facilities in 34 U.S. states, to determine the impact of the pandemic on diagnostic cardiovascular procedure volumes. Participants reported volumes for each diagnostic imaging modality used at their facility for March 2019 (baseline), April 2020, and April 2021. This secondary analysis of INCAPS COVID 2 evaluated differences in changes in procedure volume between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and among U.S. regions. Factors associated with return to prepandemic volumes in the United States were also analyzed in a multivariable regression analysis. Results: Reduction in procedure volumes in April 2020 compared with baseline was similar for U.S. and non-U.S. facilities (-66% vs -71%, P = .27). U.S. facilities reported greater return to baseline in April 2021 than did all non-U.S. facilities (4% vs -6%, P = .008), but there was no evidence of a difference when comparing U.S. facilities with non-U.S. high-income country (NUHIC) facilities (4% vs 0%, P = .18). U.S. regional differences in return to baseline were observed between the Midwest (11%), Northeast (9%), South (1%), and West (-7%, P = .03), but no studied factors were significant predictors of 2021 change from prepandemic baseline. Conclusion: The reductions in cardiac testing during the early pandemic have recovered within a year to prepandemic baselines in the United States and NUHICs, while procedure volumes remain depressed in lower-income countries.Keywords: SPECT, Cardiac, Epidemiology, Angiography, CT Angiography, CT, Echocardiography, SPECT/CT, MR Imaging, Radionuclide Studies, COVID-19, Cardiovascular Imaging, Diagnostic Cardiovascular Procedure, Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiac Testing Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.

Impact of transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair on atrial fibrillation burden: Insights from a multicenter cohort.

BACKGROUND: Patients with significant mitralregurgitation (MR) often experience atrial fibrillation (AF). The effects of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for MR on AF burden is unknown. METHODS: Patients who underwent TEER atthree institutions who also had a cardiac implantable electronic device with aright atrial lead were retrospectively identified. In patients with baseline AF, device data onAF burden and echocardiographic changes were recorded at baseline and 3- and 12-month follow up time points when available. Data is expressed as number (%) and median (interquartile range), withpaired values analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Overall 66 patients wereidentified, of whom 54 (82%) had baseline data on AF available for review. Of these, 18 (33%) had a baseline burden ofAF (median burden 100% [54-100%]). Patients were 77 (71-83) years old, 10 (56%) male, 14 (78%) White, and 3 (17%) Black. A significant reduction in AF burdenwas observed at 3 months (11 patients, p = 0.03) which did not retainsignificance at 12 months (8 patients, p = 0.69). Indexed maximal left atrial volumes did not significantly change inthose with paired studies available (p > 0.35 for both time points). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter cohort, one thirdof patients with severe MR undergoing TEER had an AF burden at baseline, whichwas found to be significantly lower at 3 month follow up. Further investigation is needed to confirm thefindings of this small cohort and determine its effects on downstream sequelaeof AF.

Cardiovascular Imaging for Ischemic Heart Disease in Women: Time for a Paradigm Shift.

Heart disease is the leading cause of death among men and women. Women have a unique phenotype of ischemic heart disease with less calcified lesions, more nonobstructive plaques, and a higher prevalence of microvascular disease compared with men, which may explain in part why current risk models to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) may not work as well in women. This paper summarizes the sex differences in the functional and anatomical assessment of CAD in women presenting with stable chest pain and provides an approach for using multimodality imaging for the evaluation of suspected ischemic heart disease in women in accordance to the recently published American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain. A paradigm shift in the approach to imaging ischemic heart disease women is needed including updated risk models, a more profound understanding of CAD in women where nonobstructive disease is more prevalent, and algorithms focused on the evaluation of ischemia with nonobstructive CAD and myocardial infarction with nonobstructive CAD.