Consensus and recommendations on vaginal-cuff Brachytherapy of the Spanish Brachytherapy Groups of SEOR and SEFM

Purpose/objective(s) On October 5, 2018, a meeting of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) Brachytherapy Group was held, in collaboration with the Spanish Society of Medical Physics (SEFM), with the aim of preparing a consensus document on postoperative vaginal-cuff brachytherapy (VCBT). Materials/methods A survey including 42 questions was sent to Spanish Radiation Oncology Centres before the meeting. The survey items included: experience in VCBT, technique indications, previous patient preparation, applicator type, implant procedure, computerized tomography (CT) simulation, definition of target volumes and organs at risk (OAR), dose prescription, fractionation, treatment planning, dosimetric parameters and constraints to OAR. Thirty-three centres answered the survey. Statistical analysis of the survey considered that there was consensus when there was ≥ 85% of agreement related to a survey item, otherwise an item with < 85% of agreement would be discussed during the meeting to reach consensus. Results The results of the survey are reported here. The mean number of patients treated per centre in 2017 was 52 ± 41 (range 7–175), and the mean number of procedures per centre was 175 ± 150 (range 24–701).There was consensus on: the indications, applicator type, the OAR to be considered, the prescription point, standardisation and dosimetric quality parameters. There was no consensus on: patient preparation for the implant, the need for performing CT simulation and the frequency, the length of the vagina to be treated, if CTV should be delimited, the definition of the clinical target volume, fractionation, overall EQD2, active source length, separation between dwelling stepping source positions, if considering the uniformity/maximum values for dwelling stepping sources, the optimization mode, and the limiting doses to the OAR (AU)

Consensus and recommendations on vaginal-cuff Brachytherapy of the Spanish Brachytherapy Groups of SEOR and SEFM.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): On October 5, 2018, a meeting of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) Brachytherapy Group was held, in collaboration with the Spanish Society of Medical Physics (SEFM), with the aim of preparing a consensus document on postoperative vaginal-cuff brachytherapy (VCBT). MATERIALS/METHODS: A survey including 42 questions was sent to Spanish Radiation Oncology Centres before the meeting. The survey items included: experience in VCBT, technique indications, previous patient preparation, applicator type, implant procedure, computerized tomography (CT) simulation, definition of target volumes and organs at risk (OAR), dose prescription, fractionation, treatment planning, dosimetric parameters and constraints to OAR. Thirty-three centres answered the survey. Statistical analysis of the survey considered that there was consensus when there was ≥ 85% of agreement related to a survey item, otherwise an item with < 85% of agreement would be discussed during the meeting to reach consensus. RESULTS: The results of the survey are reported here. The mean number of patients treated per centre in 2017 was 52 ± 41 (range 7-175), and the mean number of procedures per centre was 175 ± 150 (range 24-701).There was consensus on: the indications, applicator type, the OAR to be considered, the prescription point, standardisation and dosimetric quality parameters. There was no consensus on: patient preparation for the implant, the need for performing CT simulation and the frequency, the length of the vagina to be treated, if CTV should be delimited, the definition of the clinical target volume, fractionation, overall EQD2, active source length, separation between dwelling stepping source positions, if considering the uniformity/maximum values for dwelling stepping sources, the optimization mode, and the limiting doses to the OAR. After presenting the results of the survey, the consensus meeting discussion focused on the issues for which there was no consensus. CONCLUSION: A consensus document on postoperative VCBT of the Spanish Brachytherapy Groups of SEOR-SEFM was elaborated.

Current opinion in cervix carcinoma

We review the current status of the conventional therapeutical approaches of cervix carcinoma. Radical hysterectomy remains as the main stone in early stages and play an important role in relapses. Radiotherapy plays an important role in early and advance disease. New techniques and image expand indications and treatment possibilities. Chemotherapy platinum based with radiation therapy goes on being the standard treatment in advanced tumours or non surgical candidates. New systemic strategies are being explored in clinical trials (AU)

[Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in head and neck cancer]. / La Tomografía por Emisión de Positrones (PET) en la patología oncológica de cabeza y cuello.

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with 18F-Fluordeoxyglucose is a diagnostic imaging technique very useful in the management of head and neck cancer, better than anatomic imaging in most cases. PET shows higher diagnostic accuracy in the detection of local and regional tumor recurrences. PET is also indicated for the identification of unknown primary tumors when regional nodal metastasis is the presenting feature. The improved planning of radiation therapy with hybrid cameras PET-CT, the earlier diagnosis of post-radiotherapy residual disease and the possibility of monitoring the effects of chemotherapy makes PET imaging an important tool in evaluating tumor response to treatment.

La Tomografía por Emisión de Positrones (PET) en la patología oncológica de cabeza y cuello / Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging in head and neck cancer

La Tomografía por Emisión de Positrones (PET) con 18 F-Fluorodesoxiglucosa es una prueba de imagen de gran utilidad en el manejo de pacientes con patología tumoral maligna de cabeza y cuello, superior en la mayoría de los casos a las técnicas de imagen anatómicas. La detección de la enfermedad recurrencial es la indicación donde muestra un mayor rendimiento diagnóstico. También es de gran utilidad en la localización de tumores primarios desconocidos que debutan con adenopatías metastásicas cervicales. La posibilidad de mejorar la planificación de los tratamientos mediante la imagen híbrida PET-TAC, la capacidad de detectar precozmente y de forma más exacta la enfermedad residual post-radioterapia y la valoración precoz de la respuesta a la quimioterapia, hacen de la PET una prueba fundamental en la monitorización terapéutica de estos pacientes (AU)

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with 18F-Fluordeoxyglucose is a diagnostic imaging technique very useful in the management of head and neck cancer, better than anatomic imaging in most cases. PET shows higher diagnostic accuracy in the detection of local and regional tumor recurrences. PET is also indicated for the identification of unknown primary tumors when regional nodal metastasis is the presenting feature. The improved planning of radiation therapy with hybrid cameras PET-CT, the earlier diagnosis of post-radiotherapy residual disease and the possibility of monitoring the effects of chemotherapy makes PET imaging an important tool in evaluating tumor response to treatment (AU)

Intraoperative high dose rate brachytherapy can be used to salvage patients with previously irradiated head and neck recurrences.

PURPOSE: To develop a novel technique, intraoperative high-dose rate brachytherapy (IOHDR), in the treatment of previously irradiated head and neck cancers located at anatomical sites inaccessible to intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT). METHODS: Between October 1992 and June 1997, seven patients (median age = 65 yrs; range = 52 to 71 years) with previously irradiated head and neck recurrences at anatomical sites inaccessible to IOERT in the base of skull were treated with IOHDR after maximal resection for microscopic residual disease. Treatment volume ranged from 6 cc to 24 cc. Six patients received 15 Gy of IOHDR at 0.5 cm; one received 10 Gy using custom-made surface foam applicators. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 59 months (range 33 to 67 months). It was technically feasible to deliver IOHDR in all seven patients at sites that were inaccessible to IOERT. The morbidity (observed in two patients) was acceptable and generally surgically related. Four of seven patients (57%) were locally controlled at IOHDR site. Two failed regionally, outside the IOHDR treated sites. The disease-free survival ranged from 3 to 30 months (median 9 months) with two patients still alive, disease-free at 28 and 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: IOHDR can be used, with limited toxicity, to treat previously irradiated head and neck cancers at sites inaccessible to IOERT. We are currently evaluating the addition of limited EBRT dose to improve the local control of these poor prognosis recurrent tumors.

Intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy for previously irradiated advanced head and neck malignancies.

PURPOSE: This is a retrospective review to evaluate the role of surgery and intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT) in the treatment of patients with previously irradiated advanced head and neck cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1992 and March 1997, 38 patients (31 males, 7 females; median age of 62 years) with recurrent head and neck cancer were treated with maximal resection and IOERT at the Ohio State University (OSU). All had been previously treated with full-course radiotherapy (median 65.1 Gy, range 50-74.4 Gy). Twenty-nine patients (76%) had previously undergone one or more surgical procedures. After maximal surgery the tumor bed was treated with IOERT (single field in 36 patients and 2 fields in 2 patients), most commonly with 6 MeV electrons (87%). The dose administered (at 90% isodose line) was 15 Gy for close or microscopically positive margins in 34 patients and 20 Gy for gross disease in 1 patient. Further external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) was not given. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 30 months (range 8-39 months), 24 of the 38 patients (66%) recurred within the IOERT field. Median time to IOERT failure was 6 months (95% CI: 4.3-7.7). The 6-month, 1-, and 2-year control rates within the IOERT volume were 41%, 19%, and 13%, respectively. Thirty of the 38 patients (79%) recurred in locoregional areas. Median time to locoregional failure was 4 months (95% CI: 3.3-4.7). The 6-month, 1-, and 2-year locoregional control rates were 33%, 11%, and 4%, respectively. Distant metastases occurred in 7 patients, 5 in association with IOERT failure and 2 with locoregional failure. Median overall survival was 7 months (95% CI: 4.7-9.3). The 6-month, 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 51%, 21%, 21%, and 8%, respectively. Major treatment-related complications occurred in 6 patients (16%). CONCLUSION: IOERT alone, at the dose used, is not sufficient for control of recurrent, previously irradiated head and neck cancers. Since higher IOERT doses are associated with high morbidity, we are currently evaluating the addition of limited EBRT dose and/or brachytherapy to improve the local control of these poor prognostic recurrent tumors, with acceptable morbidity.

[Prognostic factors in prostatic carcinoma treated with radical radiotherapy: stages A, B, and C]. / Factores pronósticos en el carcinoma de próstata tratado con radioterapia radical: estadios A, B y C.

Analysis of a series of 118 patients with histological diagnosis of prostate carcinoma, localized stages A2, B and C, treated with external radiotherapy with radical purpose between July 1964 and December 1991. The 5-year cause-specific survival was 69% years and 62% at 10 years. Disease-free survival was 56% and 48% at 5 and 10 years respectively. Local, locoregional and distant relapse-free survivals were 91%, 75% and 65% at 10 years respectively. Several factors characterize each tumour, influencing the therapy failure. In our series, non-differentiated, stage C tumours with pathological LDH levels at diagnosis and treated with AP-PA fields showed decreased survival and greater relapse ratios. Two separate factors influence on distant failure: LDH pathological levels at diagnosis and non-differentiated tumours. External radiotherapy is a therapeutical alternative in localized stages of prostate carcinoma, which offers little morbidity and good tolerance, similar results to those obtained with surgical treatment.