Regressing eruptive disseminated pigmented Spitz (Reed) nevi in a young adults

Abstract Eruptive disseminated Spitz nevi is a rare clinical presentation that features an abrupt widespread eruption of Spitz nevi. Spontaneous regression of these nevi has been rarely reported in previous literature. The authors of the present study report the case of a 30-year-old man who presented eruptive disseminated Spitz nevi that appeared within a week and started regression in the following years.

Dermal substitutes: an alternative for the reconstruction of large full-thickness defects in the plantar surface

Abstract Large defects in plantar surface secondary to acral melanoma excision can be difficult to repair with local flaps, and skin grafts in weight-bearing surfaces often suffer necrosis causing prolonged disability. Acellular dermal matrices represent an easy alternative to cover deep wounds or those with bone or tendon exposure. Despite their high cost and the requirement of two surgical procedures, this alternative may offer excellent functional and aesthetic results in acral defects.

Dermal substitutes: an alternative for the reconstruction of large full-thickness defects in the plantar surface.

Large defects in plantar surface secondary to acral melanoma excision can be difficult to repair with local flaps, and skin grafts in weight-bearing surfaces often suffer necrosis causing prolonged disability. Acellular dermal matrices represent an easy alternative to cover deep wounds or those with bone or tendon exposure. Despite their high cost and the requirement of two surgical procedures, this alternative may offer excellent functional and aesthetic results in acral defects.

Regressing eruptive disseminated pigmented Spitz (Reed) nevi in a young adult.

Eruptive disseminated Spitz nevi is a rare clinical presentation that features an abrupt widespread eruption of Spitz nevi. Spontaneous regression of these nevi has been rarely reported in previous literature. The authors of the present study report the case of a 30-year-old man who presented eruptive disseminated Spitz nevi that appeared within a week and started regression in the following years.

When is it worth performing lymphadenectomy in patients with melanoma micrometastases? A 20-year experience retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Actualmente existe controversia respecto a los beneficios de realizar linfadenectomía en pacientes de melanoma con una biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela (BSGC) positiva. La carga tumoral > 1 mm se ha propuesto como el parámetro mas relevante asociado a una linfadenectomía positiva y un deterioro de la supervivencia libre de enfermedad. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se analizaron los datos de 119 pacientes de melanoma con BSGC positiva atendidos en el periodo entre Junio de 1997 y Junio de 2017. Los pacientes se clasificaron según la carga tumoral en dos grupos: ≤ 1 mm and > 1 mm. RESULTADOS: La linfadenectomía resultó positiva en sólo 6 (10%) pacientes con una carga tumoral ≤ 1 mm, y en 23 (37.7%) pacientes con carga tumoral > 1 mm (p < 0.001). En análisis univariante, la carga tumoral fue el único factor predictivo de linfadenectomía positiva (OR 5.24 (1.94-14.13)). En análisis multivariante, la carga tumoral fue la única variable independiente de supervivencia específica de melanoma (SEM). CONCLUSION: Aunque la realización de linfadenectomía debe individualizarse en cada caso, la carga tumoral > 1 mm puede ser un factor predictivo de la presencia de ganglios no centinelas positivos en piezas de linfadenectomía, y un factor pronostico independiente importante para la SEM. BACKGROUND: The benefits of complete lymph node dissection (CLND) in melanoma patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) have been recently questioned. Sentinel node (SN) tumor burden > 1 mm has been proposed as the most reliable parameter associated with positive CLND and poorer disease-free survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between June 1997 and June 2017, data from 119 melanoma patients with positive SLNB were analyzed. Patients were classified by SN burden in two groups: ≤ 1 mm and > 1 mm. RESULTS: CLND was positive in 6 (10%) patients with SN tumor burden ≤ 1 mm and in 23 (37.7%) patients with > 1 mm (p < 0.001). In univariable analysis, SN tumor burden was the only predictive factor of positive CLND (OR 5.24 [1.94-14.13]). In multivariable analysis, SN tumor burden was the only independent factor of melanoma-specific survival (MSS). CONCLUSION: Although CLND should still be considered individually in patients with positive SLNB, SN tumor burden >1 mm might be a good predictive factor of additional positive non-sentinel nodes and a strong independent prognostic factor in melanoma-specific survival.