Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lupus ; 31(2): 194-201, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35037492

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatments for catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) rose from recommendations and consensus of international experts based on case series or case reports. We aimed to evaluate the treatment scheme with the best cost-effectiveness ratio associated with lower mortality as a high-impact clinical benefit. METHODS: The CAPS Registry was used as our source of structured data on the different therapeutic strategies, their frequency, and their effectiveness (survival). Starting from around 50 different schemes, we identified those with a mortality of less than 33% within the 18 most frequently utilized. After applying the efficiency frontier method, we included two schemes to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis from the Colombian healthcare sector perspective. Scheme 1 (Glucocorticoids + Anticoagulation + Anti-aggregation + Intravenous IgG immunoglobulin) and scheme 2 (Glucocorticoids + Anticoagulation + Anti-aggregation + Plasma exchange) were compared in terms of costs and survival. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (Monte Carlo simulation) were conducted to evaluate model robustness and uncertainty. RESULTS: Our analysis uses the information corresponding to 427 cases from the CAPS registry, the majority being women (68.8%), with a mean age of 45.7 years and bearing general mortality of 38.17% (female: 38.4%, male: 37.5%). Scheme 2 was the cost-effective strategy over scheme 1. The results were robust on discrete sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis (Monte Carlo simulation). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first economic evaluation focused on the treatment of CAPS. For the Colombian health system, schemes 1 and 2 have similar behavior; nevertheless, scheme 2 represents the best cost-effectiveness ratio. This treatment approach is highly susceptible to the allocation of resources by the system and beneficial in terms of health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Antifosfolípido , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Anticoagulantes/química , Anticoagulantes/farmacología , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/química , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros
2.
Rev. colomb. reumatol ; 28(supl.1): 39-43, Dec. 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1361000

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by the development of thrombotic events and/or obstetric morbidity in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), such as the lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) or anti- β 2-glycoprotein I antibodies (a β2 GPI). In 1992, Ronald A. Asherson described a very aggressive clinical variant of this syndrome characterized by the development of multiple thrombotic manifestations, simultaneously or in a short period of time. The term catastrophic APS was proposed and since then it is known by this name.


RESUMEN El síndrome antifosfolípido (SAF) es una enfermedad sistêmica autoinmune, caracterizada por el desarrollo de eventos trombóticos y/o morbilidad obstétrica en presencia de anticuerpos antifosfolípidos (aPL), tales como el anticoagulante lúpico (AL), los anticuerpos anticardiolipina (aCL) o anticuerpos anti- β2-glicoproteína I (aβ2GPI). En 1992, Ronald A. Asherson describió una variante clínica muy agresiva de este síndrome, caracterizada por el desarrollo de múltiples manifestaciones trombóticas, de manera simultánea o dentro de un corto periodo de tiempo. Se propuso entonces el término SAF catastrófico y desde entonces se le ha conocido por ese nombre.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Síndrome Antifosfolípido , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA