RESUMEN
Bariatric techniques for bypass surgery evolve constantly. Switching from one well-established protocol to another in a running surgical teaching program is challenging. We analyzed clinical and financial outcomes at a single bariatric center transitioning from circular to an augmented linear bypass protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2011 and 2018, 454 patients were included in this retrospective study. The circular bypass protocol (CIRC; n = 177) was used between 2011 and 2012. Between 2013 and 2015 the transition occurred. Thereafter, the augmented linear protocol (aLIN; n = 277) was primarily utilized. RESULTS: Overall, the mean preoperative BMI dropped from 42.2 to 29.6 kg/m2 after 5 years with no difference between groups. Operation times were significantly shorter in the aLIN vs. CIRC group at 108 (± 32) vs. 120 (± 34) min (P < 0.001), respectively. The reoperation rate was significantly higher in the CIRC vs. aLIN group at n = 65 (36%) vs. n = 35 (13%; P < 0.001), respectively. Specifically, revision due to internal hernia occurred much more frequently in the CIRC-group, n = 36 (20%) vs. n = 12 (4%; P < 0.001). Moreover, reoperation rates for gastrojejunostomy leakage and endoscopic dilatations for anastomotic stenosis were higher in the CIRC vs. aLIN group (P < 0.001). Adjusted overall mean cost per case was lower in aLIN-patients at 15,403 (± 7848) vs. CIRC-patients at 18,525 (± 7850) Swiss francs (P < 0.001). Overall profit was 2555 ± 4768 vs. 1455 ± 5638 Swiss francs in the aLIN vs. CIRC-group, respectively (P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: This study shows improved clinical and financial outcomes after a gradual transition from a circular stapling protocol to an augmented linear stapling protocol in proximal gastric bypass surgery.