Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Cancer ; 202: 113976, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484692

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Effective treatment options are limited for patients with advanced melanoma who have progressed on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies (TT). Preclinical models support the combination of ICI with TT; however, clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of triplet combinations in first-line setting showed limited advantage compared to TT only. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study, that included patients with advanced melanoma who were treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors in combination with an anti-PD-(L)1 antibody (triplet therapy) after failure of at least one anti-PD-(L)1-based therapy and one TT in seven major melanoma centers between February 2016 and July 2022. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included, of which 32 patients, 66.7% had brain metastases, 37 patients (77.1%) had three or more metastatic organs and 21 patients (43.8%) had three or more treatment lines. The median follow-up time was 31.4 months (IQR, 22.27-40.45 months). The treatment with triplet therapy resulted in an ORR of 35.4% (n = 17) and a DCR of 47.9% (n = 23). The median DOR was 5.9 months (range, 3.39-14.27 months). Patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors as the last treatment line showed a slightly lower ORR (29.6%) compared to patients who received ICI or chemotherapy last (ORR: 42.9%). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 25% of patients (n = 12), with seven patients (14.6%) requiring discontinuation of treatment with both or either drug. CONCLUSIONS: Triplet therapy has shown activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced melanoma and may represent a potential treatment regimen after failure of ICI and TT.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quinasas de Proteína Quinasa Activadas por Mitógenos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Mutación
2.
Eur J Cancer ; 200: 113536, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38306840

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The interaction of gut microbiome and immune system is being studied with increasing interest. Disturbing factors, such as antibiotics may impact the immune system via gut and interfere with tumor response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study exclusively treatment-naïve patients with cutaneous or mucosal melanoma treated with first-line anti-PD-1 based ICB for advanced, non-resectable disease between 06/2013 and 09/2018 were included. Progression-free (PFS), and overall survival (OS) according to antibiotic exposure (within 60 days prior to ICB and after the start of ICB vs. no antibiotic exposure) were analyzed. To account for immortal time bias, data from patients with antibiotics during ICB were analyzed separately in the time periods before and after start of antibiotics. RESULTS: Among 578 patients with first-line anti-PD1 based ICB, 7% of patients received antibiotics within 60 days prior to ICB and 19% after starting ICB. Antibiotic exposure prior to ICB was associated with worse PFS (adjusted HR 1.75 [95% CI 1.22-2.52]) and OS (adjusted HR 1.64 [95% CI 1.04-2.58]) by multivariate analysis adjusting for potential confounders. The use of antibiotics after the start of ICB had no effect on either PFS (adjusted HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.89-1.60) or OS (adjusted HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.75-1.57). CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic exposure within 60 days prior to ICB seems to be associated with worse PFS and OS in melanoma patients receiving first-line anti-PD1 based therapy, whereas antibiotics after the start of ICB do not appear to affect PFS or OS.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Melanoma , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
iScience ; 27(1): 108596, 2024 Jan 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38174322

RESUMEN

Adaptive plasticity to the standard chemotherapeutic temozolomide (TMZ) leads to glioblastoma progression. Here, we examine early stages of this process in patient-derived cellular models, exposing the human lysine-specific demethylase 5B (KDM5B) as a prospective indicator for subclonal expansion. By integration of a reporter, we show its preferential activity in rare, stem-like ALDH1A1+ cells, immediately increasing expression upon TMZ exposure. Naive, genetically unmodified KDM5Bhigh cells phosphorylate AKT (pAKT) and act as slow-cycling persisters under TMZ. Knockdown of KDM5B reverses pAKT levels, simultaneously increasing PTEN expression and TMZ sensitivity. Pharmacological inhibition of PTEN rescues the effect. Interference with KDM5B subsequent to TMZ decreases cellular vitality, and clonal tracing with DNA barcoding demonstrates high individual levels of KDM5B to predict subclonal expansion already before TMZ exposure. Thus, KDM5Bhigh treatment-naive cells preferentially contribute to the dynamics of drug resistance under TMZ. These findings may serve as a cornerstone for future biomarker-assisted clinical trials.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA