Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Oral Oncol ; 156: 106945, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39002300

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the risk of osteoradionecrosis and implant survival in oral cancer patients undergoing immediate dental implants during jaw reconstruction, termed "Jaw in a Day" (JIAD), with those receiving no implants or delayed implants (non-JIAD). PATIENTS & METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were collected from prospectively enrolled JIAD patients (n = 10, 29 implants) and retrospectively from non-JIAD patients (n = 117, 86 implants). Survival analyses were performed to assess implant survival and osteoradionecrosis-free survival. RESULTS: Osteoradionecrosis occurred in 0 % of JIAD cases compared to 19.3 % in non-JIAD cases without implants and 71.4 % in non-JIAD cases with delayed implants (p = 0.008). Osteoradionecrosis-free survival was significantly better in the JIAD group than the non-JIAD group (p = 0.0059). Implants in the JIAD group all survived regardless of radiation therapy (29/29, 100 %) and 95.1 % (58/61) of implants survived in delayed implants in non-irradiated fibula without radiotherapy. Meanwhile, only 11 of 25 implants placed in irradiated fibula flaps survived, even when the implants were placed after a median time interval of 624 days after radiotherapy, and none of them were earlier than 360 days. The survival analysis revealed a significant difference (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: JIAD appears to offer superior outcomes in terms of implant survival and osteoradionecrosis prevention compared to delayed implant placement. Placing implants in irradiated fibula, even after years, significantly poses high risk of implant failure and osteoradionecrosis. JIAD represents a promising approach for optimal rehabilitation, particularly in oral cancer patients requiring postoperative radiotherapy. Proper positioning and orientation of implants and flaps are crucial for implant survival.


Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Peroné , Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Osteorradionecrosis , Humanos , Osteorradionecrosis/cirugía , Osteorradionecrosis/etiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Peroné/cirugía , Peroné/trasplante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Neoplasias de la Boca/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Boca/radioterapia , Adulto , Maxilares , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(5): e454-e457, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709024

RESUMEN

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a serious condition often linked with antiresorptive, immune modulating, and antiangiogenic drugs, initially associated with bisphosphonates but now including a broader range of medications. Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor-inhibiting monoclonal antibody used for conditions like rheumatoid arthritis and recently for COVID-19 to reduce IL-6 activity and alleviate symptoms, has raised concerns over its potential to induce MRONJ, particularly in post-COVID-19 patients. A case involving a 36-year-old male who developed tooth mobility and pain in the right maxillary posterior region after COVID-19 treatment with tocilizumab and dexamethasone is highlighted. Despite treatments like antibiotics, the necrosis persisted until more extensive surgery was performed, leading to improvement without recurrence over 2 years. This case emphasizes the need for awareness and research into the risk of MRONJ in patients treated with tocilizumab after COVID-19, underlining the importance for healthcare professionals to recognize and manage this complication.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Osteonecrosis , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Adulto , COVID-19/complicaciones , Osteonecrosis/inducido químicamente , SARS-CoV-2 , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Maxilar
3.
J Am Chem Soc ; 146(9): 6266-6273, 2024 Mar 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38394690

RESUMEN

Determining the aromaticity of various fluorinated benzenes is challenging as easily obtained experimental aromaticity [Δδ(Houter - Hinner)] necessitates the chemical shifts of inner and outer protons. This issue was addressed in porphyrinoids by replacing the electron-withdrawing (E.W.) groups at the meso-positions of porphyrins and allyliporphyrins. Electronic effects on aromaticity in porphyrinoids have not been thoroughly examined in the literature. In porphyrins, the effect of E.W. groups is minimal, making it difficult to establish a clear relationship between the aromaticity strength and E.W. groups. Conversely, in allyliporphyrins, stronger E.W. groups, such as indandione (IND) derivatives, significantly reduce the aromaticity of the parent structure. The IND derivatives disrupted the aromatic pathway of allyliporphyrin more effectively than those attached to porphyrins. This is attributed to the absence of ß-carbons in allyliporphyrins. The effect of electron-donating (E.D.) groups on porphyrins and allyliporphyrins was further investigated. Contrary to the initial assumption that the E.D. groups might enhance aromaticity owing to their ability to increase electron density, as the strength of the E.D. groups increased, the aromaticity of the porphyrinoids decreased. Despite the modest reduction in aromaticity, any form of electron perturbation reduces aromaticity. The aromaticity of various fluorinated benzenes is expected to parallel our observations of porphyrinoids as representative aromatic polyenes.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA