Modified one third tubular plate (spring plate) augmented with reconstruction plates for treatment of comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures, Short to midterm outcomes of 24 patients.

The most common form of acetabular fracture is believed to be the posterior wall; its incidence ranges from 25% to 47%. Managing such fractures has been difficult in the past and until recently. To obtain a favorable functional outcome, an accurate diagnosis and a well-executed treatment strategy are essential. Objective: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of employing a spring plate augmented by a traditional 3.5 mm reconstruction plate for the treatment of comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures. Patients and Methods: A prospective case series was performed on 24 patients with comminuted fractures of the posterior wall. After an average of 6 days, the patients underwent surgery. Eighteen patients were fixed with one spring plate, six patients were fixed with two spring plates, and all were reinforced with a 3.5-mm reconstruction plate. Each case was followed once every three months until the fracture healed and then regularly every six months thereafter. Results: There were 21 men and 3 women. The average follow-up period was 14 months, and the median age was 34.5 years. The main reason for injuries was motor vehicle collisions. The mean operation time was 107.5 min. The clinical results were evaluated by the MAP and m HHS, and the means were 10.2 (5-12) and 86 (64-96), respectively. Only two patients developed avascular necrosis and were treated by total hip replacement, another three (12.5%) had mild arthritis. Conclusion: Comminuted acetabulum posterior wall fractures can be stabilized with spring plates. It could be used in conjunction with the primary reconstruction plate as a viable alternative for stable and anatomical reduction. High patient satisfaction and good functional results make this approach effective.

Consensus for management of sacral fractures: from the diagnosis to the treatment, with a focus on the role of decompression in sacral fractures.

BACKGROUND: There is no evidence in the current literature about the best treatment option in sacral fracture with or without neurological impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Italian Pelvic Trauma Association (A.I.P.) decided to organize a consensus to define the best treatment for traumatic and insufficiency fractures according to neurological impairment. RESULTS: Consensus has been reached for the following statements: When complete neurological examination cannot be performed, pelvic X-rays, CT scan, hip and pelvis MRI, lumbosacral MRI, and lower extremities evoked potentials are useful. Lower extremities EMG should not be used in an acute setting; a patient with cauda equina syndrome associated with a sacral fracture represents an absolute indication for sacral reduction and the correct timing for reduction is "as early as possible". An isolated and incomplete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs does not represent an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a high-energy trauma, while a worsening and progressive radicular neurological deficit represents an indication. In the case of a displaced sacral fracture and neurological deficit with imaging showing no evidence of nerve root compression, a laminectomy after reduction is not indicated. In a patient who was not initially investigated from a neurological point of view, if a clinical investigation conducted after 72 h identifies a neurological deficit in the presence of a displaced sacral fracture with nerve compression on MRI, a laminectomy after reduction may be indicated. In the case of an indication to perform a sacral decompression, a first attempt with closed reduction through external manoeuvres is not mandatory. Transcondylar traction does not represent a valid method for performing a closed decompression. Following a sacral decompression, a sacral fixation (e.g. sacroiliac screw, triangular osteosynthesis, lumbopelvic fixation) should be performed. An isolated and complete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs represents an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a low-energy trauma associated with imaging suggestive of root compression. An isolated and incomplete radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs does not represent an absolute indication. A worsening and progressive radicular neurological deficit of the lower limbs represents an indication for laminectomy after reduction in the case of a displaced sacral fracture in a low-energy trauma associated with imaging suggestive of root compression. In the case of a displaced sacral fracture and neurological deficit in a low-energy trauma, sacral decompression followed by surgical fixation is indicated. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus collects expert opinion about this topic and may guide the surgeon in choosing the best treatment for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not applicable (consensus paper).

Implant retention with serial debridement and use of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads in acute fracture-related infection (FRI) after pelvic ring or acetabular fractures: A retrospective case series of 7 cases.

BACKGROUND: The development of a pelvic wound infection in the presence of hardware after open reduction and internal fixation presents a clinical dilemma and there is little literature to aid in decision-making. The purpose of this study was to describe the possibility of debridement, antibiotic pearls and retention of the implant (DAPRI) procedure to eradicate the infection. METHODS: Tumor-like debridement, antibiotic pearls and retention of the implant (DAPRI) aimed to remove the biofilm allowing a higher and prolonged local antibiotic concentration by using calcium sulfate antibiotic-added beads. Wound status, radiological signs of bone healing, gait and functional activity of the patient were evaluated. RESULTS: Seven patients underwent this technique. The mean follow up time was nine months (range: 6 -16 months). Complete wound healing was achieved in all the patients with no major complications. Average time of bony union was 4.3 months (range: 3-6 months) with no need for implant removal. CONCLUSION: The DAPRI technique might represent a safe and more conservative treatment for management of early fracture-related infections (FRI) of the pelvis and acetabulum.