Classificação endoscópica do megaesôfago / Endoscopic CLassification of megaesophagus

Apesar de apresentar diminuição em sua incidência, a doença de Chagas aina é a terceira doença tropical mais frequente. A endoscopia digestiva alta (EDA) cresce em importância como metódo auxiliar para eses pacientes, principalmente na avaliação da mucosa e diagnóstico de neoplasias. Até o presente momento, não se encontra na literatura uma classificação para padronizar a descrição das alterações endoscópicas nos pacientes com megaesôfago. Tal classisficação que tivesse boa correlação radiológica, poderia facilitar o tratamento desses pacientes, reduzindo o número de exames. Objetivos: Apresentar uma proposta de classificação endoscópica para pacientes com megaesôfago. Material e Método: Sessenta e cinco pacientes consecutivos com megaesôfago foram avaliados por dois endoscopistas experientes, cegos entre si, durante um único exame. A análise estatistica realizada pelo teste de Kappa, comparando os resultados obtidos com os achados radiológicos pela classificação de Rezende, além de análise da variaçãointerobservador. resultados: Os endoscopistas apresentaram indice de concordância excelenmte (K= 0,90) quando comparados entre si e concordâancia forte (K=0,67) quando comparados com a classificação radiológica. Conclusões: Esta classificação pode ser útil, já que parece haver boa concordância com os achados radiológicos e ser facilmente reproduzida. Novos estudos são necessários para comprovar os benefícios de sua utilização na prática clínica.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia and analysis of one-year reinfection rates

Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is endemic worldwide. The proposed treatment is expensive and there are few reports regarding reinfection rates in Brazil. The aim of this study was to compare the eradication rates obtained with two therapeutic options and to evaluate reinfection one year after treatment. This was a prospective randomized trial with 55 patients. Thirty-nine patients had active duodenal ulcer (DU) and 16 non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD), and all tested positive for HP. Diagnosis was based on at least two positive tests: ultrarapid urease test, histology and/or culture. Patients were randomized to two groups: group OMC treated with 40 mg omeprazole (once a day), 500 mg metronidazole and 250 mg clarithromycin (twice daily) for 7 days, or group NA treated with 300 mg nizatidine (once a day) and 1000 mg amoxicillin (twice daily) for 14 days. Those patients in whom HP was eradicated were followed up for one year to evaluate reinfection. Twenty-five patients were randomized for OMC and 30 for NA. HP eradication occurred in 20/25 patients (80 per cent) treated with OMC and 13/30 (43 per cent) treated with NA (P = 0.01). After reallocation because of initial treatment failure, the overall eradication rate was 44/51 patients (86 per cent). After an average follow-up of one year, we evaluated 34 patients (23 with DU and 11 with NUD). Reinfection occurred in 3/34 patients (7.6 per cent). We conclude that OMC is effective for HP eradication, and that NA should not be used. Reinfection occurs in 7.6 per cent of the patients in the first year after eradication.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia and analysis of one-year reinfection rates.

Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is endemic worldwide. The proposed treatment is expensive and there are few reports regarding reinfection rates in Brazil. The aim of this study was to compare the eradication rates obtained with two therapeutic options and to evaluate reinfection one year after treatment. This was a prospective randomized trial with 55 patients. Thirty-nine patients had active duodenal ulcer (DU) and 16 non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD), and all tested positive for HP. Diagnosis was based on at least two positive tests: ultrarapid urease test, histology and/or culture. Patients were randomized to two groups: group OMC treated with 40 mg omeprazole (once a day), 500 mg metronidazole and 250 mg clarithromycin (twice daily) for 7 days, or group NA treated with 300 mg nizatidine (once a day) and 1000 mg amoxicillin (twice daily) for 14 days. Those patients in whom HP was eradicated were followed up for one year to evaluate reinfection. Twenty-five patients were randomized for OMC and 30 for NA. HP eradication occurred in 20/25 patients (80%) treated with OMC and 13/30 (43%) treated with NA (P = 0.01). After reallocation because of initial treatment failure, the overall eradication rate was 44/51 patients (86%). After an average follow-up of one year, we evaluated 34 patients (23 with DU and 11 with NUD). Reinfection occurred in 3/34 patients (7.6%). We conclude that OMC is effective for HP eradication, and that NA should not be used. Reinfection occurs in 7.6% of the patients in the first year after eradication.

Pancreatic pseudocysts transpapillary and transmural drainage.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic pseudocyst endoscopic drainage has been described as a good treatment option, with morbidity and mortality rates that are lower than surgery. The aim of our study is to describe the efficacy of different forms of endoscopic drainage and estimate pseudocyst recurrence rate after short follow up period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 30 patients with pancreatic pseudocyst that presented some indication for treatment: persistent abdominal pain, infection or cholestasis. Clinical evaluation was performed with a pain scale, 0 meaning absence of pain and 4 meaning continuous pain. Pseudocysts were first evaluated by abdominal CT scan, and after endoscopic retrograde pancreatography the patients were treated by transpapillary or transmural (cystduodenostomy or cystgastrostomy) drainage. Pseudocyst resolution was documented by serial CT scans. RESULTS: 25/30 patients could be treated. Drainage was successful in 21 (70% in an 'intention to treat' basis). After a mean follow-up of 42 +/- 35.82 weeks, there was only 1 (4.2%) recurrence. A total of 6 complications occurred in 37 procedures (16.2%), and all but 2 were managed clinically and/or endoscopically: there was no mortality related to the procedure. Patients submitted to combined drainage needed more procedures than the other groups. There was no difference in the efficacy when we compared the three different drainage methods. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that pancreatic pseudocyst endoscopic drainage is possible in most patients, with high success rate and low morbidity.

Band ligation or sclerotherapy as endoscopic treatment for oesophageal varices in schistosomotic patients: results of a randomized study.

Endoscopic sclerotherapy and banding ligation are the two preferred methods to treat oesophageal variceal bleeding. There are many reports dealing with such treatment in cirrhotic patients but we do not know how good they are to treat varices secondary to other forms of portal hypertension. Schistosomiasis mansoni is the main cause of portal hypertension and oesophageal varices in Brazil. We performed a prospective randomised study to compare: 1) the efficacy of both treatments in eradicating oesophageal varices, and 2) complications secondary to both treatments. Forty patients were divided in two groups. Both sclerotherapy and banding ligation were performed until variceal eradication. There were no severe complications. Variceal eradication was faster obtained with banding ligation than sclerotherapy although there was no statistical difference (mean number of sessions 3.05 vs 3.72, p = 0.053). Benign complications were equally frequent in both groups, although additional sedation was more common in the sclerotherapy group. We concluded that both treatments are equally effective in the eradication of oesophageal varices, although banding ligation is better tolerated by the patient and probably faster.

Risk of Helicobacter pylori transmission by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has been reported as a risk factor for the transmission of Helicobacter pylori. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of transmission of H. pylori infection by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients who had previously had such procedures in a low disinfection level environment. METHODS: The study included 1082 patients. Patients that had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or were treated with antibiotics 15 days before the index endoscopy were excluded. H. pylori infection was diagnosed by ultra-rapid urease test. Variables analyzed were age, gender, type of dyspepsia (organic or functional), and the number of previous upper gastrointestinal endoscopies. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of H. pylori infection was 60%. Patients ranged in age from 13 to 94 years (mean = 45.8, SD = 15.7) and the number of previous upper gastrointestinal endoscopies ranged from 0 to 20 (mean = 1.5, SD = 2.4). In 53.3% of the patients, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed some mucosal lesion (organic dyspepsia). Prevalence of H. pylori infection was higher in patients with organic rather than functional dyspepsia (71.1% vs. 47.1%, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in patients with and without H. pylori infection. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that there was no association between history of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and current H. pylori infection in this study population.

Prospective study of bacteremia rate after elastic band ligation and sclerotherapy of esophageal varices in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal band ligation is considered to be as efficient as endoscopic sclerotherapy, with a lower complication rate, including bacteremia. There are few studies comparing the two methods. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of bacteremia after both treatments in patients with portal hypertension secondary to schistosomiasis. METHODS: Endoscopic sclerotherapy and band ligation were performed using standard techniques. Blood samples were obtained 5 and 30 minutes after endoscopic band ligation or sclerotherapy and cultured for aerobic and anaerobic organisms. RESULTS: In the sclerotherapy group 2 of 43 (4.6%) blood cultures were positive (Peptostreptococcus sp and Streptococcus mitis). A similar result was obtained in the band ligation group: 2 of 35 (5.7%) had positive cultures, both with Staphylococcus aureus. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in the frequency of bacteremia after treatment of esophageal varices with endoscopic sclerotherapy or endoscopic band ligation in patients with portal hypertension secondary to schistosomiasis.

[Comparison between invasive tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infections]. / Comparação entre testes invasivos para o diagnóstico da infecção pelo Helicobacter pylori.

Helicobacter pylori is a Gram negative bacteria that colonizes gastric epithelial cells. It has been associated with several gastric disease including chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer. Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis can be done with invasive and non-invasive methods. In invasive methods an endoscopic gastric mucosa biopsy specimen is used. In our study we compare the sensitivity, specificity, costs and applicability of four invasive diagnostic tests: culture, urease ultra-rapid test, histology (Giemsa and Hematoxilineosin stain) and fuchsin stained mucosal slides. Urease test was the easiest, fastest diagnostic test, with sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 100%, being also the cheapest test. We concluded that it should be the test of choice for Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis.

Biliary and pancreatic stent blockage by bacterial biofilm: presentation of two cases.

Biliary and pancreatic stents are effective tools in the management of obstructive jaundice (both malignant and benign), pancreatic pseudocyst drainage, and as treatment for biliary and pancreatic fistulae. Unfortunately, stents may become blocked and require replacement in a number of patients. In the present study a blocked stent from a patient with transpapillary drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst and another from a patient with obstructive jaundice resulting from cancer of the head of the pancreas associated with Mirizzi syndrome were characterized by electron microscopy. Stent blockage was diagnosed by a pressure test and stent cultures were performed. Electron microscopy of the blocked stents revealed the sludge to consist of microcolonies of bacteria mixed with amorphous material, and cultures of both stents were positive for Klebsiella sp and E. coli.

Biliary and pancreatic stent blockage by bacterial biofilm: presentation of two cases

Biliary and pancreatic stents are effective tools in the management of obstructive jaundice (both malignant and benign), pancreatic pseudocyst drainage, and as treatment for biliary and pancreatic fistulae. Unfortunately, stents may become blocked and require replacement in a number of patients. In the present study a blocked stent from a patient with transpapillary drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst and another from a patient with obstructive jaundice resulting from cancer of the head of the pancreas associated with Mirizzi syndrome were characterized by electron microscopy. Stent blockage was diagnosed by a pressure test and stent cultures were performed. Electron microscopy of the blocked stents revealed the sludge to consist of microcolonies of bacteria mixed with amorphous material, and cultures of both stents were positive for Klebsiella sp and E. coli.

[Endoscopic therapy of pancreatic pseudocyst]. / Terapêutica endoscópica do pseudocisto de pâncreas.

Endoscopy therapy of pancreatic pseudocyst has been described as an efficient method. We report six cases of pancreatic pseudocyst treated by pancreatic stenting (three cases), cystogastrostomy (three cases) and cystoduodenostomy (one case). Rapid symptomatic improvement and pseudocyst regression were noted in all cases, except one. Such patient needed pancreatic stenting even after cystogastrostomy due to main pancreatic duct stenosis. There were three complications: hemorrhage (one case) and pseudocyst infection (two cases), and all were treated clinically. Two patients had pseudocyst infection previous to endoscopic manipulation, and they were treated only with antibiotics and endoscopic drainage, without surgery (treatment suggested by most of the authors). We concluded that endoscopic therapy of pancreatic pseudocyst is efficient and safe, being responsible for rapid relief of symptoms in most of patients.