RESUMEN
Background: Adverse antibiotic reactions caused by an immunological mechanism are known as allergic reactions. The percentage of reported antibiotic allergies is likely to differ from the one validated after a drug provocation test (DPT) with the culprit antibiotic. This study aimed to compare the percentage of children who were thought to be allergic to a certain antibiotic with those who have a true allergy, as confirmed by DPTs. We also validated Skin Prick Tests (SPTs) and Intradermal Tests (IDTs) by assessing their sensitivity and specificity, in diagnosing antibiotic allergies using DPT as the gold standard. Furthermore, we investigated epidemiological risk factors such as personal and family history of atopic disease and eosinophilia. Methods: Children with a history of possible allergic reaction to an antibiotic underwent a diagnostic procedure that included: (1) Eosinophil blood count, (2) SPTs, (3) IDTs and (4) DPTs. The parameters were compared with Pearson's Chi-Square and Fisher's Exact Test. Several risk factors that were found significant in univariate analysis, such as personal and family history of atopic disease, and positive SPTs and IDTs were examined with multiple logistic regression analysis to see if they were related to a higher risk for a positive DPT. Results: Semi-synthetic penicillin was the most common group of antibiotics thought to cause allergic reactions in this study. Overall, 123 children with a personal history of an adverse reaction to a certain antibiotic, were evaluated. In 87.8% of the cases, the symptoms had occurred several hours after administration of the culprit antibiotic. Both SPTs and IDTs had low sensitivity but high specificity. Moreover, they had a high positive predictive value (PPV). In contrast, eosinophilia was not recognized as a risk factor. Seventeen patients (13.8%) had a true antibiotic allergy, as confirmed by a positive DPT. A positive IDT was a strong predictor of a positive DPT, along with a positive personal and family history of atopy. Conclusion: SPTs and IDTs are very reliable in confirming antibiotic allergy when found positive. A negative result of a SPT highly predicts a negative DPT. A positive IDT and a positive personal and family history of atopy were recognized as significant risk factors for antibiotic allergy.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: 3ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3ß-HSD) deficiency is a rare type of congenital adrenal hyperplasia caused by recessive loss-of-function mutations in HSD3B2 gene. CASE PRESENTATION: We report an 8.5-year-old, 46XY, Roma boy with advanced adrenarche signs born to consanguineous parents. He was born at term with ambiguous genitalia. At 15 days of age, he underwent replacement therapy with hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone due to a salt wasting (SW) crisis and adrenal insufficiency. At 3.5 years, he was admitted again with SW crisis attributed to the low - unadjusted to body surface area - hydrocortisone dose and presented with bilateral gynecomastia and adrenarche. At 8.5 years, his bone age was four years more advanced than his chronological age and he was prepubertal, with very high testosterone levels. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) urinary steroid metabolome analysis revealed the typical steroid metabolic fingerprint of 3ß-HSD deficiency. Sequencing of the HSD3B2 gene identified in homozygosity the novel p.Lys36Ter nonsense mutation. Furthermore, this patient was found to be heterozygous for p.Val281Leu in the CYP21A2 gene. Both parents were identified as carriers of the p.Lys36Ter in HSD3B2. CONCLUSIONS: A novel nonsense p.Lys36Ter mutation in HSD3B2 was identified in a male patient with hypospadias. 3ß-HSD deficiency due to mutations in the HSD3B2 gene is extremely rare and the finding of a patient with this rare type of disorders of sex development (DSD) is one of the very few reported to date. The complexity of such diseases requires a multidisciplinary team approach regarding the diagnosis and follow-up.