IncobotulinumtoxinA for Glabellar Frown Lines in Chinese Subjects: A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-Controlled Phase-3 Study.

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of IncobotulinumtoxinA 20 U for treatment of glabellar frown lines in Chinese subjects. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase-3 study conducted in China. Subjects with moderate to severe glabellar frown lines at maximum frown were randomized to receive IncobotulinumtoxinA (N = 336) or OnabotulinumtoxinA (N = 167). Results: For the primary efficacy endpoint at day 30, response rates at maximum frown (score "none" or "mild") on the Merz Aesthetic Scales Glabella Lines - Dynamic were comparable between IncobotulinumtoxinA (92.5%) and OnabotulinumtoxinA (95.1%) per investigator's live rating. Noninferiority of IncobotulinumtoxinA versus OnabotulinumtoxinA was successfully demonstrated, as the two-sided 95% confidence interval of -0.97% to 0.43% for the difference in Merz Aesthetic Scales-based response rates (-0.27%) lay completely above the predefined noninferiority margin of -15%. For the secondary efficacy endpoints assessed at day 30, Merz Aesthetic Scales-based response rates (score "none" or "mild") at maximum frown were similarly comparable between both groups per subject (>85%) and independent review panel (>96%) rating. Per Global Impression of Change Scales, greater than 80% of subjects and greater than 90% of investigators in both groups rated treatment results as at least "much improved" at day 30 compared with baseline. Safety profiles were consistent between groups; IncobotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified in Chinese subjects. Conclusion: IncobotulinumtoxinA 20 U is safe and effective for treatment of moderate to severe glabellar frown lines at maximum frown in Chinese subjects and is noninferior to OnabotulinumtoxinA 20 U.

IncobotulinumtoxinA Demonstrates Safety and Prolonged Duration of Effect in a Dose-Ranging Study for Glabellar Lines.

BACKGROUND: To further explore clinical trial results indicating increasing doses of botulinum toxin A prolong duration of effect, a 2-stage, phase 2, randomized, double-blind study investigated the duration of effect and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO; Xeomin®, Bocouture®) doses higher than the US Food and Drug Administration-approved 20 units (U) for glabellar frown lines (GFL). The stage 1 primary efficacy and safety results were reported previously. Here, we report the results of the final analysis (stage 1 and 2), including primary and secondary efficacy and safety endpoints. METHODS: A total of 241 subjects with moderate-to-severe GFL were randomized to receive a single treatment with 20 (N=61), 50 (N=60), 75 (N=61), or 100U (N=59) INCO. The primary efficacy endpoint was duration of ≥ 1-point improvement from baseline assessed by investigator at maximum frown on the Facial Wrinkle Scale. RESULTS: The median duration of effect was 175 days for the 20U group (95% CI 142, 185), 185 days for the 50U group (95% CI 182, 205), 210 days for the 75U group (95% CI 182, 217), and 215 days for the 100U group (95% CI 183, 237). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was low across all doses and there were no treatment-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that all INCO doses were well tolerated, consistent with the known safety profile of 20U, and increasing dose prolongs the duration of effect for GFL. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(10):1052-1060. doi:10.36849/JDD.6377THIS ARTICLE HAD BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO ACCESS THE FULL TEXT OF THIS ARTICLE WITHOUT LOGGING IN. NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLISHER WITH ANY QUESTIONS.

IncobotulinumtoxinA Demonstrates Safety and Prolonged Duration of Effect in a Dose-Ranging Study for Glabellar Lines.

BACKGROUND: Recently reported clinical data provides evidence that increasing the dose of botulinum toxin A increases the duration of efficacy. A 2-stage Phase 2, randomized, double-blind study investigated the duration of effect and safety of IncobotulinumtoxinA (INCO; Xeomin®, Bocouture®; Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) at doses higher than the approved 20 units (U) for glabellar frown lines (GFL). Primary safety and efficacy endpoints of Stage 1 are reported here. METHODS: 151 subjects with moderate-to-severe GFL were randomized 1:2:2 to receive a single treatment with 20U, 50U, or 75U INCO. The primary efficacy endpoint was median duration of at least 1-point improvement from baseline as assessed by investigator at maximum frown on the Facial Wrinkle Scale. RESULTS: The median duration of effect was 185 days for the 50U dose group (95% CI:[182, 205]) and 210 days for the 75U dose group (95% CI:[182, 217]). Duration of effect was significantly longer for 75U vs 50U (P=0.0400) and 20U (P=0.0166) despite the study not being powered for confirmatory statistical significance testing between the dose groups. Duration of effect was also longer for 50U vs 20U, however; statistical significance was not reached (P=0.4349). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was low across all doses (20U:2[6.7%], 50U:6[10.0%] and 75U:8[13.1%]). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate a dose effect of at least 6 months duration with higher doses in the majority of GFL subjects. All doses were well tolerated and safety was consistent with the known safety profile of 20U INCO for GFL. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(10):985-991. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5454.

Comparison of the spread of three botulinum toxin type A preparations.

Botulinum toxins are frequently used in esthetics to improve the appearance of facial wrinkles. In this setting, precise localization of the neurotoxin is required to produce the desired clinical effects. Unwanted effects can occur if the neurotoxin diffuses into untargeted muscle. Therefore, a neurotoxin with low and predictable spread would be preferable for esthetic applications. The aim of this study was to investigate the spread of three approved botulinum toxin type A preparations, with and without complexing proteins, by measuring and comparing the size of the anhidrotic halos they produced following injection of equivalent doses in an identical volume into the forehead of patients. The results showed that incobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA displayed comparable spread at 6 weeks (maximal area of anhidrosis within 6 weeks) and area under the effect curve (AUEC) over 6 months. However, abobotulinumtoxinA, when assuming a 1:2.5 injection volume ratio, produced a statistically significantly greater maximal area of anhidrosis within 6 weeks and AUEC over 6 months compared with incobotulinumtoxinA. All preparations were well tolerated. The results of this study demonstrate that incobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA have comparable spread, while abobotulinumtoxinA has significantly greater spread than incobotulinumtoxinA.