Safety evaluation of a strategy to restart elective orthopaedic surgery during the de-escalation phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIMS: To evaluate safety outcomes and patient satisfaction of the re-introduction of elective orthopaedic surgery on 'green' (non-COVID-19) sites during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A strategy consisting of phased relaxation of clinical comorbidity criteria was developed. Patients from the orthopaedic waiting list were selected according to these criteria and observed recommended preoperative isolation protocols. Surgery was performed at green sites (two local private hospitals) under the COVID-19 NHS contract. The first 100 consecutive patients that met the Phase 1 criteria and underwent surgery were included. In hospital and postoperative complications with specific enquiry as to development of COVID-19 symptoms or need and outcome for COVID-19 testing at 14 days and six weeks was recorded. Patient satisfaction was surveyed at 14 days postoperatively. RESULTS: There were 54 females and 46 males (mean age 44 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 25.6 kg/m2). In all, 56 patients underwent major orthopaedic procedures. There were no exclusions. One patient had a postoperative positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test but had no typical symptoms of COVID-19 infection and no clinical sequelae. 99% of patients were satisfied with the process and 98% would recommend undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery in the study period. CONCLUSION: In an environment with appropriate infrastructure, patient selection, isolation, screening, and testing, elective orthopaedic surgery is safe during the COVID-19 pandemic, and associated with high patient satisfaction. Further follow-up is required to establish that safety is maintained as the clinical restrictions are eased with the phased approach described.Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-8:450-456.

Computed tomography analysis of sacropelvic parameters in relation to anterior access to the lumbosacral disc.

Purpose: Anecdotally a higher pelvic incidence (PI) confers a 'deeper' pelvis with the potential for challenging access, yet this is ill-defined in the existing literature. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship of sacropelvic sagittal parameters and their relationship with the projection angle (PA), an indicator of access to and orientation of the lumbosacral disc with respect to the pelvis and identify a threshold PI value beyond which more difficult surgical access may be anticipated.Materials and methods: Computed tomography (CT) scans taken for trauma were studied. Measures including the PI, sacral kyphosis (SK), sacral table angle (STA), PA and anterior pelvic angle (APA) were taken. The PA is the angle subtended by a line from the apex of the pubic symphysis to the sacral promontory and a line running along the sacral endplate. A positive value is obtained when the line from the endplate runs superior to the symphysis.Results: 168 scans were reviewed, mean age 44.2 years (s.d. 18.4). The mean PI was 50.0 (s.d. 10.2), SK 24.4 (s.d. 12.3), and STA 102.0 (s.d. 6.1). The mean PA was 20.1 (range -14 to 46; s.d. 10.3). PA correlated with PI (R = -0.892; p < .001) and also SK (R = -0.760; p < .001). With PI values above 73 the PA is likely to be negative with the lumbosacral disc orientation falling behind the pubic symphysis. One-way analysis of variance showed differences in PA according the six subclasses of PI.Conclusion: The PA, as an indicator of the orientation of the lumbosacral disc with respect to the pelvis, correlated strongly with the PI. Patients with high PI are more likely to have a lumbosacral disc with trajectory falling behind the pubic symphysis and surgeons should closely analyse pelvic anatomy, particularly in patients with high PI.

Laparoscopic splenectomy and diaphragmatic rupture repair in a 27-week pregnant trauma patient.

Report of a 27-week pregnant woman having diaphragmatic rupture and intrathoracic ruptured spleen is presented. She was managed by laparoscopic reduction of the intrathoracic viscus, with repair of the defect and splenectomy.