Is urinary density an adequate predictor of urinary osmolality?

BACKGROUND: Urinary density (UD) has been routinely used for decades as a surrogate marker for urine osmolality (Uosm). We asked if UD can accurately estimate Uosm both in healthy subjects and in different clinical scenarios of kidney disease. METHODS: UD was assessed by refractometry. Uosm was measured by freezing point depression in spot urines obtained from healthy volunteers (N = 97) and in 319 inpatients with acute kidney injury (N = 95), primary glomerulophaties (N = 118) or chronic kidney disease (N = 106). RESULTS: UD and Uosm correlated in all groups (p < 0.05). However, a wide range of Uosm values was associated with each UD value. When UD was ≤ 1.010, 28.4% of samples had Uosm above 350 mOsm/kg. Conversely, in 61.6% of samples with UD above 1.020, Uosm was below 600 mOsm/kg. As expected, Uosm exhibited a strong relationship with serum creatinine (Screat), whereas a much weaker correlation was found between UD and Screat. CONCLUSION: We found that UD is not a substitute for Uosm. Although UD was significantly correlated with Uosm, the wide dispersion makes it impossible to use UD as a dependable clinical estimate of Uosm. Evaluation of the renal concentrating ability should be based on direct determination of Uosm.

N-Acetylcysteine protects the peritoneum from the injury induced by hypertonic dialysis solution.

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress has been implicated in the development of peritoneal damage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in a rat peritoneal infusion model. METHODS: Eighteen male Wistar rats were divided in 3 groups: (i) control group; (ii) HDS group, receiving peritoneal dialysis solution (PDS); and (iii) HDS+NAC group, receiving PDS and oral NAC. Six weeks later they were evaluated for dialysate to plasma urea ratio (D/P), ratio of glucose concentration in peritoneal fluid (G1/G0), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in plasma and urine and histology of peritoneal membrane. RESULTS: The HDS+NAC group presented a lower increase in solute transport (D/P 0.51 ± 0.1, and G1/GO 0.35 ± 0.06) in comparison with the HDS group (D/P 0.67 ± 0.1; p=0.03, and G1/G0 0.27 ± 0.07; p=0.01). The HDS+NAC group showed lower thiobarbituric acid reactive substance concentrations compared with the HDS group. In the treated group, the peritoneal membrane presented lower thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Functional and histological peritoneal changes were significantly reduced by the treatment with NAC.

Pruritus in hemodialysis patients: the problem remains.

Pruritus is still one of the most common and disturbing symptoms of end-stage renal disease. The objective of this study is to analyze the prevalence of pruritus in hemodialysis patients and the possible factors implicated in its genesis. In a cross-sectional study, 101 patients on hemodialysis at our center were screened for pruritus. The relationship of various factors with pruritus was evaluated. Of the 101 patients included, 31(30.7%) had pruritus at the time of examination. Patients with pruritus were significantly older than those without pruritus (P=0.0027). Pruritus tended to be more prevalent in patients undergoing dialysis 3 times a week than in those undergoing daily dialysis, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.0854). Lower transferrin saturation levels were found in patients with pruritus than in those without pruritus (P=0.0144). C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in patients with pruritus than in those without pruritus (P=0.0013). There was no significant difference between the groups in the levels of the other inflammatory biomarkers measured. However, there was a tendency toward a correlation between the levels of alpha-1-glycoprotein and the intensity of pruritus (P=0.0834). Our results suggest a possible relationship of the inflammatory response upregulation to pruritus. Additionally, there was a positive relationship between pruritus and iron deficiency, possibly associated with inflammatory elevation of hepcidin. A better understanding of the factors implicated in the genesis of pruritus related to end-stage renal disease is crucial in the development of more effective treatments for this symptom.

Apoptosis in kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Apoptosis is a particular form of cell death involved in the elimination of somatic cells. In this study, the occurrence of apoptotic cells in kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies was analyzed and correlated with the number of infiltrating macrophages and lymphocytes and granzyme B expression. METHODS: Kidney and pancreas biopsies from patients submitted to simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation were classified into three groups: acute rejection, chronic rejection, and transplant cases without evidence of rejection. Formalin-fixed paraffin biopsies were used to identify apoptosis by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase [TdT]-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) method. RESULTS: In normal kidney, only few apoptotic cells were observed. In contrast, in kidney-allograft biopsies, the TUNEL signal was detected in the nuclei of tubular epithelial cells and also in mononuclear cells scattered in the interstitium. In pancreas biopsies, numerous apoptotic cells were detected in acinar cells, in ducts, and occasionally in islets. The number of apoptotic cells in acute pancreas rejection was significantly higher compared with acute rejection of kidney grafts (50+/-14 vs. 21+/-4 cells/mm2; P<0.05). In kidney biopsies, there was a positive correlation between apoptosis and macrophages (r=0.51; P<0.005), and apoptosis versus T lymphocytes (r=0.45; P<0.05). In pancreas biopsies, the number of apoptotic cells correlated only with the number of macrophages (r=0.41; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Apoptosis occurs in kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies, markedly in acute rejection in pancreas biopsies. Although apoptosis may reflect a mechanism of down-regulation of the allograft immune response by eliminating infiltrating cells, the elimination of graft cells may result in graft damage, particularly in pancreas transplantation.