Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 232(1): 91-7, 2008 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18167116

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety of paste formulations of firocoxib and phenylbutazone in horses with naturally occurring osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. ANIMALS: 253 client-owned horses with naturally occurring osteoarthritis. PROCEDURES: Horses were treated with firocoxib (0.1 mg/kg [0.045 mg/lb], PO, q 24 h) or phenylbutazone (4.4 mg/kg [2 mg/lb], PO, q 24 h) for 14 days. Physical examinations and lameness evaluations were performed prior to treatment and after 7 and 14 days. Clinical improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 1 lameness grade or a combined reduction of at least 3 points in scores for pain during manipulation or palpation, joint swelling, joint circumference, and range of motion. RESULTS: Proportion of horses clinically improved on day 14 for the firocoxib group (104/123 [84.6%]) was not significantly different from the proportion for the phenylbutazone group (103/119 [86.6%]). Proportion of horses that were improved on day 14 was significantly greater for horses treated with firocoxib than for horses treated with phenylbutazone with regard to score for pain on manipulation or palpation (P = 0.028), joint circumference score (P = 0.026), and range of motion score (P = 0.012), but not for overall lameness score or joint swelling score. No direct treatment-related adverse effects were detected during the study. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggested that overall clinical efficacy of a paste formulation of firocoxib in horses with naturally occurring osteoarthritis was comparable to efficacy of a paste formulation of phenylbutazone.


Asunto(s)
4-Butirolactona/análogos & derivados , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de los Caballos/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoartritis/veterinaria , Fenilbutazona/uso terapéutico , Sulfonas/uso terapéutico , 4-Butirolactona/efectos adversos , 4-Butirolactona/uso terapéutico , Animales , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Enfermedades de los Caballos/patología , Caballos , Cojera Animal/epidemiología , Cojera Animal/patología , Masculino , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoartritis/patología , Fenilbutazona/efectos adversos , Rango del Movimiento Articular/efectos de los fármacos , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sulfonas/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Vet Ther ; 8(1): 41-50, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17447224

RESUMEN

This positive-control study evaluated the efficacy of firocoxib versus carprofen, deracoxib, and meloxicam for the prevention of pain and inflammation in a urate crystal synovitis model of lameness. Lameness scoring and force plate gait analysis were used to assess efficacy. The resulting lameness scores and force plate ground reaction forces after urate crystal injection were not significantly different among the groups. Relative to each group's baseline (nonlame) score, only the firocoxib group was not significantly lame, based on lameness score, at the model's peak effect.


Asunto(s)
4-Butirolactona/análogos & derivados , Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa 2/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Sulfonas/uso terapéutico , Sinovitis/veterinaria , 4-Butirolactona/administración & dosificación , 4-Butirolactona/uso terapéutico , Animales , Carbazoles/administración & dosificación , Carbazoles/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa 2/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades de los Perros/patología , Perros , Femenino , Cojera Animal/inducido químicamente , Cojera Animal/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Meloxicam , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonas/administración & dosificación , Sinovitis/inducido químicamente , Sinovitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tiazinas/administración & dosificación , Tiazinas/uso terapéutico , Tiazoles/administración & dosificación , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ácido Úrico
3.
Vet Ther ; 7(2): 127-40, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16871495

RESUMEN

A total of 249 client-owned dogs with osteoarthritis were treated with firocoxib (5 mg/kg/day) or a positive control, etodolac (10-15 mg/kg/day), for 30 days. Veterinary examinations were performed on approximately days 0 (visit 1), 14 (visit 2), and 29 (visit 3). Based on defined noninferiority criteria, firocoxib and etodolac were comparable. Based on the magnitude of the change from baseline, improvement with firocoxib was significantly greater than with etodolac for lameness at a trot (visits 2 and 3) and for lameness at a walk, pain on manipulation, and range of motion (visit 3) (P < .05). In weekly owner evaluations, firocoxib provided significantly greater improvement than etodolac (P < .05) at each scoring.


Asunto(s)
4-Butirolactona/análogos & derivados , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoartritis/veterinaria , Sulfonas/uso terapéutico , 4-Butirolactona/efectos adversos , 4-Butirolactona/uso terapéutico , Animales , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de los Perros/patología , Perros , Etodolaco/efectos adversos , Etodolaco/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Cojera Animal/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoartritis/patología , Rango del Movimiento Articular/efectos de los fármacos , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Seguridad , Sulfonas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Vet Dent ; 22(3): 157-9, 2005 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16295802

RESUMEN

A study was conducted in 40 healthy, randomly selected, client-owned, mixed and purebred dogs to assess the efficacy of a barrier dental sealant. All dogs showed evidence of dental plaque, calculus, or gingivitis. The dental sealant was applied to one side of the mouth following a professional teeth cleaning procedure and reapplied weekly for 8-weeks following the cleaning procedure. Dental parameters evaluated included plaque, calculus, gingivitis, and gingival bleeding indices. A statistically significant difference was detected between treated and untreated teeth compared with baseline values for plaque and calculus at weeks 4 and 8, gingivitis at week 4, and gingival bleeding time at week 8. A professional teeth cleaning procedure followed by a single application of the barrier dental sealant and weekly reapplication performed by a veterinarian or veterinary technician provided significant improvement in plaque and calculus indices during an 8-week period.


Asunto(s)
Placa Dental/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Perros/terapia , Gingivitis/veterinaria , Selladores de Fosas y Fisuras/uso terapéutico , Animales , Cálculos Dentales/prevención & control , Cálculos Dentales/terapia , Cálculos Dentales/veterinaria , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Caries Dental/veterinaria , Placa Dental/prevención & control , Placa Dental/terapia , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Perros , Gingivitis/prevención & control , Gingivitis/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...