Does Timing of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Affect Prognosis in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator? Results From the Multicenter Randomized PARTITA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Optimal timing for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia is an important unresolved issue. There are no randomized trials evaluating the benefit of ablation after the first implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shock. METHODS: We conducted a 2-phase, prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients with ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and primary or secondary prevention indication for ICD were enrolled in an initial observational phase until first appropriate shock (phase A). After reconsenting, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 in phase B to immediate ablation (within 2 months from shock delivery) or continuation of standard therapy. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or hospitalization for worsening heart failure. Amiodarone intake was not allowed except for documented atrial tachyarrhythmias. On July 23, 2021, phase B of the trial was interrupted as a result of the first interim analysis on the basis of the Bayesian adaptive design. RESULTS: Of the 517 patients enrolled in phase A, 154 (30%) had ventricular tachycardia, 56 (11%) received an appropriate shock over a median follow-up of 2.4 years (interquartile range, 1.4-4.4), and 47 of 56 (84%) agreed to participate in phase B. After 24.2 (8.5-24.4) months, the primary end point occurred in 1 of 23 (4%) patients in the ablation group and 10 of 24 (42%) patients in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.01-0.85]; P=0.034). The results met the prespecified termination criterion of >99% Bayesian posterior probability of superiority of treatment over standard therapy. No deaths were observed in the ablation group versus 8 deaths (33%) in the control group (P=0.004); there was 1 worsening heart failure hospitalization in the ablation group (4%) versus 4 in the control group (17%; P=0.159). ICD shocks were less frequent in the ablation group (9%) than in the control group (42%; P=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular tachycardia ablation after first appropriate shock was associated with a reduced risk of the combined death or worsening heart failure hospitalization end point, lower mortality, and fewer ICD shocks. These findings provide support for considering ventricular tachycardia ablation after the first ICD shock. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01547208.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: There are conflicting data on the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare patient outcomes according to the presence or absence of permanent AF at device implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed remote monitoring data from 1141 CRT defibrillators. Propensity score with inverse-probability weighting method was used to balance AF and sinus rhythm (SR) groups. Analysis endpoints included total mortality, appropriate defibrillation shocks, and CRT percentage. There were 229 patients (20.1%) in the AF group and 912 patients (79.9%) in the SR group. Compared with SR patients, AF patients were older (median age, 77 vs. 72 years, P < 0.001), more frequently male (82.5% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.02), and had higher heart rate (75.7 vs. 71.0 b.p.m., P < 0.001). Of the 229 AF patients, 162 (70.7%) received suboptimal CRT (<98%) and 67 (29.3%) had adequate CRT (≥98%). During a median follow-up of 24 months, total mortality did not differ between AF and SR groups (propensity-score-weighted hazard ratio, HR 1.32 [95% confidence interval, 0.82-2.15], P = 0.25). The risk of appropriate shocks was significantly higher in the AF group with <98% CRT than in the SR group (weighted-HR, 1.99 [1.21-3.26], P = 0.006) and was similar in the AF group with ≥98% CRT versus the SR group (1.29 [0.66-2.53], P = 0.45). During follow-up, sinus rhythm was recovered in 23 patients in the AF group (10%) after a median time of 106 (42-256) days. The rate of sinus rhythm recovery in the AF group was 4.5 (95% CI, 2.8-6.7) per 100 patient-years; the rate of permanent AF occurrence in the SR group was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.9-3.3) per 100 patient-years. CONCLUSIONS: Although mortality was similar across patient groups, patients with permanent AF and suboptimal CRT had twofold higher risk of appropriate shocks than SR patients or AF patients with CRT ≥ 98%.

Ventricular arrhythmias in aortic valve stenosis before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

AIMS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a therapeutic treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at high surgical risk. Although the procedure is associated with a reduction in total mortality, there are no data regarding changing in the incidence of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) after TAVI. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of VAs before and after TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 237 patients who underwent TAVI at our centre. Ninety-one patients were excluded for the following reasons: presence of prior permanent pacemaker (PPM) (n = 20), new PPM implant after TAVI (n = 48), death during the follow-up period (n = 16), and lost at follow-up (n = 7). Finally, 146 patients were included in our analysis. The presence of VAs was evaluated in all patients recording a 24 h Holter monitoring before the procedure and after 1 and 12 months. Ventricular arrhythmias were classified according to a modified Lown grading system. Before the procedure, isolates PVCs (grade 1-2 of Lown grading system) were present in 34.9% of patients (n = 51). Complex PVCs (grade 3-4a-4b of Lown grading system) were present in 48.6% of the population (multifocal PVCs in 32 patients, 21.9%; pairs in 25 patients, 17.1%; ventricular tachycardia in 14 patients, 9.6%). One month after the procedure, we observed statistically significant incidence decrease of arrhythmias of grade 3 (from 21.9 to 17.1%) and grade 4 (pairs from 17.1 to 12.3%; ventricular tachycardia from 9.6 to 4.8%). After 12 months, there was a further significant reduction in the frequency and severity of PVCs. In particular, 45.8% of patients had isolates PVCs (<30 in all given hours of monitoring in 45 patients, 30.8%; higher than 30 in any hour of monitoring in 22 patients, 15%) while the frequency of complex arrhythmias was reduced to 16.4% (multifocal PVCs in 13 patients, 9%; couplets 8 patients, 5.5% and ventricular tachycardia in 3 patients, 2.0%). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that VAs are common in patients with AS. We observed a significant decrease in the incidence and severity of PVCs since the first month after TAVI. Furthermore, after 1 year follow-up there was a further and significant reduction in the frequency of complex PVCs. This may be related to the benefits determined by valve replacement on left ventricular function.