Corrigendum: A wolf in sheep's clothing-aortic stenosis and cardiac amyloidosis: "RAISE"ing awareness in clinical practice.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1323023.].

A wolf in sheep's clothing-aortic stenosis and cardiac amyloidosis: "RAISE"ing awareness in clinical practice.

Aesop's fable of the wolf in sheep's clothing encourages us to look beneath the exterior appearance of a situation and evaluate the truth that lies beneath. This concept should be applied when managing older patients with severe aortic stenosis. This population of patients is increasingly being identified as having concomitant cardiac amyloidosis, which is an underrecognized cause of common cardiac conditions. The presence of cardiac amyloidosis negatively affects the outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, these patients undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with increasing frequency and have a significantly higher overall mortality rate than patients with aortic stenosis alone. Although left ventricular wall hypertrophy is expected in patients with aortic stenosis, it should not be assumed that this is caused only by aortic stenosis. A suspicion of cardiac amyloidosis should be raised in patients in whom the degree of hypertrophy is disproportionate to the degree of aortic stenosis severity. The remodeling, age, injury, systemic, and electrical (RAISE) score was developed to predict the presence of cardiac amyloidosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis. This article highlights the value of increased clinical suspicion, demonstrates the use of the multiparameter RAISE score in daily clinical practice, and illustrates the scoring system with case studies. In elderly patients being considered for TAVR, systematic testing for cardiac amyloidosis should be considered as part of the preoperative workup.

Assessment and referral of patients with short stature by primary care physicians in the Arabian gulf region: Current perspectives from a regional survey.

Children with short stature are frequently referred late to pediatric endocrinologists in the Arabian Gulf region. This is likely a contributing factor to late initiation of treatment despite current evidence suggesting that children with short stature have better outcomes with earlier treatment. This delay in referral could be due to a lack of identification or proper assessment of short stature by front-line physicians. To analyze the assessment and perception of short stature in this group of physicians, an expert group of pediatric endocrinologists developed and disseminated an anonymous online survey of 22 multiple choice questions amongst general pediatricians, pediatric subspecialists, and family medicine physicians in the Arabian Gulf region. Of the 640 respondents, 450 completed the survey (70.3% completion rate). While most surveyed physicians use the correct definition for short stature in children, only 24% reported a consistent use of a wall-mounted stadiometer. Of the respondents, 50% or less would consider referring clinical conditions other than growth hormone (GH) deficiency or idiopathic short stature, 41% would refer a child with short stature as soon as height dropped below the 5th percentile, 57% considered GH a treatment option for short stature, and only 60% consider GH treatment safe. The results of this survey demonstrate knowledge gaps in short stature assessment and referral that need to be addressed through education on short stature amongst target physicians, and lay groundwork for future recommendations to address those gaps in the Arabian Gulf region.