Integrated modeling of labile and glycated hemoglobin with glucose for enhanced diabetes detection and short-term monitoring.

Metabolic biomarkers, particularly glycated hemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose, are pivotal in the diagnosis and control of diabetes mellitus. Despite their importance, they exhibit limitations in assessing short-term glucose variations. In this study, we propose labile hemoglobin as an additional biomarker, providing insightful perspectives into these fluctuations. By utilizing datasets from 40,652 retrospective general participants and conducting glucose tolerance tests on 60 prospective pediatric subjects, we explored the relationship between plasma glucose and labile hemoglobin. A mathematical model was developed to encapsulate short-term glucose kinetics in the pediatric group. Applying dimensionality reduction techniques, we successfully identified participant subclusters, facilitating the differentiation between diabetic and non-diabetic individuals. Intriguingly, by integrating labile hemoglobin measurements with plasma glucose values, we were able to predict the likelihood of diabetes in pediatric subjects, underscoring the potential of labile hemoglobin as a significant glycemic biomarker for diabetes research.

Volumetric analysis: Rethinking brain metastases response assessment.

Background: The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology for Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria are the gold standard for assessing brain metastases (BMs) treatment response. However, they are limited by their reliance on 1D, despite the routine use of high-resolution T1-weighted MRI scans for BMs, which allows for 3D measurements. Our study aimed to investigate whether volumetric measurements could improve the response assessment in patients with BMs. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated a dataset comprising 783 BMs and analyzed the response of 185 of them from 132 patients who underwent stereotactic radiotherapy between 2007 and 2021 at 5 hospitals. We used T1-weighted MRIs to compute the volume of the lesions. For the volumetric criteria, progressive disease was defined as at least a 30% increase in volume, and partial response was characterized by a 20% volume reduction. Results: Our study showed that the proposed volumetric criteria outperformed the RANO-BM criteria in several aspects: (1) Evaluating every lesion, while RANO-BM failed to evaluate 9.2% of them. (2) Classifying response effectively in 140 lesions, compared to only 72 lesions classified by RANO-BM. (3) Identifying BM recurrences a median of 3.3 months earlier than RANO-BM criteria. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the superiority of volumetric criteria in improving the response assessment of BMs compared to the RANO-BM criteria. Our proposed criteria allow for evaluation of every lesion, regardless of its size or shape, better classification, and enable earlier identification of progressive disease. Volumetric criteria provide a standardized, reliable, and objective tool for assessing treatment response.