Prospective trial of natalizumab personalised extended interval dosing by therapeutic drug monitoring in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (NEXT-MS).

BACKGROUND: Extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab is a promising strategy to optimise treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS). Personalised EID by therapeutic drug monitoring can enable further extension of treatment intervals. METHODS: The NEXT-MS trial is an investigator-initiated prospective phase IV non-randomised study. Adults with a diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS who received ≥6 natalizumab infusions were included in three groups: personalised EID with a target drug trough concentration of 10 µg/mL (EID10), an exploratory group of personalised EID with a target of 5 µg/mL (EID5) and standard interval dosing (SID) of 4 weeks. The primary outcome is radiological disease activity (new/newly enlarged T2 lesions) comparing the EID10 group to a historical cohort of SID (HSID). RESULTS: Results of the first phase of the NEXT-MS trial are reported here (n=376) as the study will continue with an amended protocol. In the EID10 group (n=251), incidence rate of radiological activity was 10.0 per 1000 person-years, which was non-inferior to the HSID cohort (24.7 per 1000 person-years (n=87), incidence rate difference 14.7, 90% CI -4.5 to 34.0). Incidence rate of radiological activity was 10.0 per 1000 person-years in the EID5 group (n=65), and 47.0 per 1000 person-years in the SID group (n=60). Serum neurofilament light levels did not increase over time within the EID groups. There were no cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. CONCLUSIONS: MS disease activity is adequately controlled with personalised natalizumab EID. Interval extension to a drug trough concentration of 5 µg/mL is likely a safe target to extend natalizumab treatment intervals >6 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04225312.

Decrease of natalizumab drug levels after switching from intravenous to subcutaneous administration in patients with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab is effective in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). In 2021, the European Medicines Agency approved the subcutaneous (SC) variant of natalizumab which can be used instead of intravenous administration. However, the course of drug levels varies between administration routes, and the Food and Drug Administration rejected the request for approval of natalizumab SC for reasons that were not disclosed. Our objective was to evaluate the course of natalizumab trough drug levels in patients who switched from natalizumab intravenous to SC on various treatment intervals. METHODS: The NEXT-MS trial (N=382) investigates personalised treatment of natalizumab, in which infusion intervals are prolonged based on individual natalizumab trough drug levels. In 2021, an amendment was approved allowing participants to switch from intravenous to SC administration with frequent measurements of natalizumab drug levels and antidrug antibodies (ADAs). Results were compared with linear mixed model analyses. RESULTS: Until December 2022, 15 participants switched to SC natalizumab. Natalizumab drug levels with SC administration were on average 55% lower compared with intravenous administration (Exp (estimate) 0.45, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.53, p<0.001), leading to very low trough drug levels in three patients on extended treatment intervals. No natalizumab ADAs were detected during intravenous or SC treatment. None of the participants on natalizumab SC showed evidence of MS disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: Natalizumab trough drug levels can decrease after switching from natalizumab intravenous to SC administration. We advise to monitor trough drug levels in patients with low natalizumab drug levels during intravenous treatment, patients with higher body mass index or patients on extended treatment intervals who switch to SC administration of natalizumab.

Electrophysiologic testing aids diagnosis and subtyping of myoclonus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the contribution of electrophysiologic testing in the diagnosis and anatomical classification of myoclonus. METHODS: Participants with a clinical diagnosis of myoclonus were prospectively recruited, each undergoing a videotaped clinical examination and battery of electrophysiologic tests. The diagnosis of myoclonus and its subtype was reviewed after 6 months in the context of the electrophysiologic findings and specialist review of the videotaped clinical examination. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients with myoclonus were recruited. Initial clinical anatomical classification included 25 patients with cortical myoclonus, 7 with subcortical myoclonus, 2 with spinal myoclonus, and 15 with functional myoclonic jerks. In 23 cases, clinical anatomical classification was not possible because of the complexity of the movement disorder. Electrophysiologic testing was completed in 66, with agreement of myoclonus in 60 (91%) and its subtype in 28 (47%) cases. Subsequent clinical review by a movement disorder specialist agreed with the electrophysiologic findings in 52 of 60; in the remaining 8, electrophysiologic testing was inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Electrophysiologic testing is an important additional tool in the diagnosis and anatomical classification of myoclonus, also aiding in decision-making regarding therapeutic management. Further development of testing criteria is necessary to optimize its use in clinical practice.