Efficacy of the Grit Scale Score in Predicting Voice Therapy Adherence and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Voice therapy generally is considered first-line treatment for dysphonia and vocal fold paresis. It requires a commitment of time, effort and resources; currently, there is no good indicator to identify which patients are good candidates for voice therapy. The Grit scale, developed by psychologist Angela Duckworth, provides a method to quantify perseverance and commitment to long-term goals. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the Grit scale score could correlate with patient adherence to voice therapy and outcomes, by which subjects with higher Grit scale scores demonstrate greater adherence and better outcomes. METHODS: Subjects were categorized into five groups, subjects who (1) were discharged from therapy after successful completion, (2) improved to normal, near-normal, or a level of voice function with which the patients were satisfied, and then stopped attending therapy (3) attended as at least the recommended number of sessions or greater than 8 sessions with some voice improvement (4) failed to improve to a voice function level satisfactory to the patient despite attending voice therapy, (5) failed to attend voice therapy as recommended. Subjects in groups 1-4 were considered adherent to voice therapy, whereas group 5 was considered not adherent. Category 1 was considered the most favorable outcome, whereas Category 5 was considered the least favorable outcome (1 > 2 > 3 > 4 > 5). RESULTS: Eighty-nine subjects are included in the study. The average age of subjects was 44.9 years old, and there was a nearly equal split between male and female subjects. The mean Grit score (48) of the adherent group (categories 1-4) was not significantly different from that of the non-adherent group (47, P = 0.190). Spearman's rho between Grit scale score and the categories (1 > 2 > 3 > 4 > 5) was 0.0674, P = 0.530. CONCLUSION: Neither the analysis by groups nor the Spearman correlation across all categories supported our hypothesis that higher Grit scale scores would be associated with better adherence and outcomes. The failure of the Grit scale score to predict adherence to voice therapy and outcomes emphasizes the need for further research to find a metric that will help predict and improve patient adherence with voice therapy and voice outcomes. Further research is needed to determine why it was unable to be predictive and to confirm or refute our findings.

Immediate and Short-term Effects of Straw Phonation in Air or Water on Vocal Fold Vibration and Supraglottic Activity of Adult Patients with Voice Disorders Visualized with Strobovideolaryngoscopy: A Pilot Study.

Purpose The first purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the short-term effects after a semi-occluded vocal tract (SOVT) therapy session consisting of straw phonation (SP) in air or water on vocal fold vibration and supraglottic activity of adult patients with voice disorders, visualized with strobovideolaryngoscopy (SVL). The second purpose of this study was to investigate and compare immediate changes in the patients' vocal fold vibration and supraglottic activity during SP in air or water, visualized with SVL. Methods Twelve adult patients with voice disorders (eight women and four men, mean age 52 years) were assigned randomly to one of two study groups: SP in air or SP in water. Immediately before and after a therapy session of 15 min, participants underwent a rigid SVL to determine the short-term effects of the SP session. At the posttherapy examination, flexible SVL while performing SP was added to determine the effects occurring during SP. The visual-perceptual ratings were performed blindly and in random order by three laryngologists, using the Voice-Vibratory Assessment with Laryngeal Imaging rating form for stroboscopy. ResultsShort-term effects after SP: After the SP-in-air session, the supraglottic mediolateral compression decreased significantly. The SP-in-water session led to significantly increased left vibrational amplitude. Immediate effects during SP: During SP in air, a significantly increased left amplitude and mucosal wave, and significantly decreased mediolateral supraglottic activity, were found. SP in water tended to decrease the vibrational amplitude during performance of the task. A trend toward higher anteroposterior supraglottic compression was observed during both SP in air and water, being more prominent in the latter. Conclusion SP in air led to less false vocal fold adduction and consequently less hyperfunction. The small increment in anteroposterior supraglottic activity during SP in air and water might be related to epilarynx narrowing, an economic phenomenon associated with SOVT exercises. The effects on vibrational amplitude were rather ambiguous. The small reduction in amplitude during SP in water is expected to diminish vocal fold impact stress and therefore creates an ideal basis for voice therapy. The increment in amplitude and mucosal wave during SP in air might indicate insufficient supraglottic pressure to obtain the favorable effects of semi-occlusion. Whether or not the rise in amplitude after the SP-in-water session is due to voice efficiency or voice fatigue remains unknown. Future larger-scale investigation in subgroups of voice patients is needed to explore these hypotheses.

Increased HIV diagnoses in West Virginia counties highly vulnerable to rapid HIV dissemination through injection drug use: a cautionary tale.

PURPOSE: To investigate HIV transmission potential from a cluster of HIV infections among men who have sex with men to persons who inject drugs in 15 West Virginia counties. These counties were previously identified as highly vulnerable to rapid HIV dissemination through injection drug use (IDU) associated with high levels of opioid misuse. METHODS: We interviewed persons with 2017 HIV diagnoses about past-year risk behaviors and elicited sexual, IDU, and social contacts. We tested contacts for HIV and assessed risk behaviors. To determine HIV transmission potential from persons with 2017 diagnoses to persons who inject drugs, we assessed viral suppression status, HIV status of contacts, and IDU risk behaviors of persons living with HIV and contacts. RESULTS: We interviewed 78 persons: 39 with 2017 diagnoses and 39 contacts. Overall, 13/78 (17%) injected drugs in the past year. Of 19 persons with 2017 diagnoses and detectable virus, 9 (47%) had more than or equal to 1 sexual or IDU contacts of negative or unknown HIV status. During the past year, 2/9 had injected drugs and shared equipment, and 1/9 had more than or equal to 1 partner who did so. CONCLUSIONS: We identified IDU risk behavior among persons with 2017 diagnoses and their contacts. West Virginia HIV prevention programs should continue to give high priority to IDU harm reduction.

The effect of oral topical anesthesia on the characteristics of voice.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Although oral topical anesthesia is used routinely before rigid laryngeal endoscopy, no study has determined whether oral topical anesthesia changes voice quality. Our goal was to determine the effects of topical anesthesia on voice. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Adult patients presenting to a laryngology practice who required rigid laryngeal endoscopy as part of the routine clinical visit were eligible for the study. Voices were recorded before and after oral topical benzocaine (14%)/butamben (2%)/tetracaine (2%) (ie, cetacaine) spray. Consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V) protocol was used for the voice recordings and was the primary outcome measure. Recordings were presented randomly to two blinded speech-language pathologists specialized in voice. Secondary outcome measures were fundamental frequency (F0), jitter, shimmer, and noise-to-harmonics ratio (N/H) on sustained /i/ and speaking F0. RESULTS: One hundred two patients participated in the study. There was no significant difference in CAPE-V measurements before and after topical anesthesia for all six attributes: overall severity (P = 0.145), roughness (P = 0.214), breathiness (P = 0.761), strain (P = 0.053), pitch (P = 0.301), and loudness (P = 0.320). There was no significant difference in jitter (P = 0.315), shimmer (P = 0.942), N/H (P = 0.128), and speaking F0 (P = 0.320). F0 /i/ decreased by a mean of 4.8Hz, which was statistically significant (P = 0.003), but probably not clinically significant. CONCLUSION: There was no clinically significant voice change after oral topical anesthesia.