Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Colorectal Dis ; 20(6): 554, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29502341
2.
Colorectal Dis ; 20(6): 529-535, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29178415

RESUMEN

AIM: Sigmoid volvulus is a condition with a tendency to recur if treated conservatively. Little is known about the best type of treatment or when to perform definitive surgery. The aim of this study was to review treatment, and assess the outcome, of sigmoid volvulus in adult patients treated at a Swedish university hospital. METHOD: The medical records of patients treated for sigmoid volvulus at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden from January 2000 to September 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Median follow-up time was 8.3 years. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-eight patients were included with a total of 453 admissions for sigmoid volvulus. Nonoperative decompression was attempted as the initial treatment in 438/453 (97%), with a success rate of 92% (403/438), which was not influenced by whether it was the first episode or a recurrence. Without planned surgery, recurrence occurred after 84% of successful nonoperative decompressions with a median of two recurrences (1-16). Recurrence was less common after the first episode compared with subsequent episodes. Median time until recurrence was 58 days. Mortality after planned surgery following successful decompression was 3.3% (2/61) compared with 13% (6/46) following emergency surgery. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, the recurrence rate of sigmoid volvulus following successful nonoperative decompression was high. Still, more than 20% of patients did not experience a recurrence after their first episode. Nonoperative decompression could thus be suggested as the sole treatment for the first episode of volvulus. However, after the second episode it is probable that early planned surgery would improve outcome and reduce health-care consumption.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Vólvulo Intestinal/terapia , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suecia , Adulto Joven
3.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 58(7): 882-90, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24924532

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Necrotising soft-tissue infections (NSTIs) are rare conditions with high morbidity and mortality. Patients with NSTIs are often transferred to tertiary hospitals, but the question of whether the potential benefits of highly specialised care outweigh the risks associated with inter-hospital transfers has been raised. METHODS: Prospective study including all patients with NSTIs treated at the intensive care unit at Sahlgrenska University Hospital/East between January 2008 and December 2011. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with NSTIs were identified. Their median age was 54 years and 69% were men. Major co-morbidities were present in 45%. Seventeen patients (59%) were referred from other hospitals. Only 33% of the patients were correctly diagnosed or suspected of having NSTIs in the emergency department. Group A Streptococcus was the most common microbiological finding (41%), followed by Enterobacteriaceae (17%). The median time from hospitalisation to the first dose of antibiotics was 6 h and the median time to primary surgery was 16 h. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy was given to 86%, and intravenous immunoglobulin was given in 52% of the cases. The 30-day mortality was 14% (4/29). The times to the first dose of antibiotics, intensive care unit admission and primary surgery did not differ between transferred and directly admitted patients, and there was no difference in outcome between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSTIs develop severe local and systemic symptoms and require extremely resource-demanding hospitalisation. Inter-hospital transfer was not associated with a delay in key interventions and could not be identified as a risk factor for adverse outcome.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Streptococcus pyogenes/aislamiento & purificación , APACHE , Adulto , Anciano , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Preescolar , Terapia Combinada , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/patología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/terapia , Comorbilidad , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Desbridamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Necrosis , Transferencia de Pacientes , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/patología , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/epidemiología , Suecia/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA