RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and T cell response after a two-dose regimen of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this observational study, patients with RA who are ≥18 years of age and vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 according to the Argentine National Health Ministry's vaccination strategy were included. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies (ELISA-COVIDAR test), neutralizing activity (cytotoxicity in VERO cells), and specific T cell response (IFN-γ ELISpot Assay) were assessed after the first and second dose. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients with RA were included. Mostly, homologous regimens were used, including Gam-COVID-Vac (27.5%), ChAdOx1 (24.2%), and BBIBP-CorV (22.5%). The most frequent combination was Gam-COVID-Vac/mRNA-1273 (21.7%). After the second dose, 81.7% presented with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, 70.0% presented with neutralizing activity, and 65.3% presented with specific T cell response. The use of BBIBP-CorV and treatment with abatacept (ABA) and rituximab (RTX) were associated with undetectable antibodies and no neutralizing activity after two doses. BBIBP-CorV was also associated with the absence of T cell response. The total incidence of adverse events was 357.1 events per 1,000 doses, significantly lower with BBIBP-CorV (166.7 events per 1,000 doses, P < 0.02). CONCLUSION: In this RA cohort vaccinated with homologous and heterologous regimens against COVID-19, 2 out of 10 patients did not develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, 70% presented with neutralizing activity, and 65% presented with specific T cell response. The use of BBIBP-CorV was associated with deficient humoral and cellular response, whereas treatment with ABA and RTX resulted in an impaired anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG formation and neutralizing activity.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , COVID-19 , Chlorocebus aethiops , Animales , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Células Vero , COVID-19/prevención & control , Linfocitos T , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Abatacept , Rituximab , Vacunación , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Inmunoglobulina GRESUMEN
Introducción: las necesidades y perspectivas de los pacientes son determinantes para tratar la artritis reumatoidea (AR). Objetivos: evaluar el impacto de la respuesta inadecuada a los fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad (DMARD) sobre la satisfacción con el tratamiento, los resultados y las perspectivas de pacientes adultos con control inadecuado de la AR de actividad moderada/alta. Materiales y métodos: se evaluó la satisfacción mediante el cuestionario Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) v1.4. Se recolectaron datos sobre la calidad de vida, la adherencia y las estrategias de manejo. Se presentan los resultados para Argentina, Chile y Uruguay (n=202). Resultados: el promedio de la escala de satisfacción global TSQM fue de 62,3±21,8. El 83% informó buena adherencia. Las principales expectativas del tratamiento fueron "alivio duradero de los síntomas" y "menos dolor articular". El 53,47% prefirió tratamiento oral y el 75,74% eligió un rápido inicio de acción. El efecto secundario menos aceptado fue "mayor riesgo de neoplasias". Se planificó rotar el DMARD en el 55% de los casos. De estos, el 84,7% se consideraron terapias avanzadas. La mayoría estaba abierto a un esquema combinado, pero el 25,2% prefirió no utilizarlo. Conclusiones: los resultados reafirman el compromiso con las estrategias treat-to-target, considerando la individualización de las decisiones terapéuticas en el contexto regional.
Introduction: patients' needs and perspectives are determinants for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objectives: to evaluate the impact of inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on treatment satisfaction, outcomes and perspectives of adult patients with inadequate control of moderate/high activity RA. Materials and methods: satisfaction was assessed using the TSQM v1.4 questionnaire. Data on quality of life, adherence and management strategies were collected. Results are presented for Argentina, Chile and Uruguay (n=202). Results: the mean of the TSQM global satisfaction score was 62.3±21.8. Eighty-three percent reported good adherence. The main expectations of treatment were "lasting relief of symptoms" and "less joint pain". The 53.47% of patients preferred an oral treatment; 75.74% chose a rapid onset of action. The least accepted side effect was "increased risk of malignant neoplasms". Fifty-five percent planned to rotate DMARD. Of these, advanced therapies were considered in only 84.7%. Most were open to a combination treatment, but 25.2% preferred not to use it. Conclusions: the results reaffirm the commitment to treat-to-target strategies, considering the individualization of therapeutic decisions in the regional context.
RESUMEN
Introducción: la pandemia de COVID-19 tuvo un gran impacto en la sociedad en general. El aislamiento impuesto modificó las relaciones interpersonales, incluyendo las consultas médicas. Objetivos: describir las consultas reumatológicas en el Servicio de Reumatología del Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica (IREP) durante la pandemia por COVID-19, y compararlas con las recibidas durante 2019. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional. Se registraron las consultas recibidas durante marzo-septiembre de 2020. Se recolectaron datos sociodemográficos, número y motivo de las consultas realizadas por paciente. Se llevó a cabo un análisis de regresión logística múltiple para estimar las variables asociadas a la consulta presencial. Resultados: se registraron 1.703 consultas; 798 pacientes consultaron al menos una vez, la mediana de consulta por paciente fue de 3 (RIC 1-12). La principal vía de consulta fue por correo electrónico (57%), solo el 13% fue de forma presencial. El principal motivo fue la solicitud de recetas (60%) seguido por consultas por la enfermedad (23%). Se observó una reducción del total de las consultas con respecto al año previo del 57% (3.961) y una reducción mayor del 94% en el número de consultas presenciales (224). La consulta médica presencial durante la pandemia se asoció independientemente con el sexo masculino (OR: 2.4 IC 95% 1,6-3,6), la consulta por enfermedad de base (OR: 5.8 IC 95% 4,1-8,3) y la ausencia de cobertura social (OR: 2.3 IC 95% 1,6-3,3). Conclusiones: las consultas reumatológicas, especialmente las presenciales, disminuyeron sustancialmente durante la pandemia.
Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic had a great impact on society in general. The imposed isolation modified interpersonal relationships, including medical consultations. Objectives: describe the rheumatologic consultations in the Rheumatology Service from Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica (IREP) during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare them with those received the previous year. Materials and methods: observational study. Consultations during March-September 2020 were recorded. Sociodemographics, numbers, and reasons for consultations made per patient were collected. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate variables associated with the in-person consultation. Results: 1,703 consultations were registered. 798 patients consulted at least 1 time, and the median number of consultations per patient was 3 (IQR 1-12). The main method of consultation was by email (57%); only 13% were in person. The main reason was requesting prescriptions (60%) followed by consultations for the disease (23%). We observed a reduction in the total number of consultations compared to the same period in 2019 of 57% (3,961 consultations) and an even greater reduction of 94% in the number of in-person consultations (224 consultations). In-person medical consultation during the pandemic was independently associated with male sex (OR: 2,4, 95%CI 1,6-3,6), consultation due to illness (OR: 5,8, 95%CI 4,1-8,3) and lack of social coverage (OR: 2,3. 95%CI 1,6-3,3). Conclusions: rheumatologic consultations, especially in-person, were substantially reduced during the pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Visita DomiciliariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with rheumatic and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) in Argentina: the SAR-CoVAC registry. METHODS: SAR-CoVAC is a national, multicenter, and observational registry. Adult patients with rheumatic or IMIDs vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 were consecutively included between June 1 and September 17, 2021. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, underlying rheumatic or IMIDs, treatments received, their modification prior to vaccination, and history of SARS-CoV-2 infection were recorded. In addition, date and place of vaccination, type of vaccine applied, scheme, adverse events (AE), disease flares, and new immune-mediated manifestations related to the vaccine were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1234 patients were included, 79% were female, with a mean age of 57.8 (SD 14.1) years. The most frequent diseases were rheumatoid arthritis (41.2%), osteoarthritis (14.5%), psoriasis (12.7%), and spondyloarthritis (12.3%). Most of them were in remission (28.5%) or low disease activity (41.4%). At the time of vaccination, 21% were receiving glucocorticoid treatment, 35.7% methotrexate, 29.7% biological (b) disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD), and 5.4% JAK inhibitors. In total, 16.9% had SARS-CoV-2 infection before the first vaccine dose. Most patients (51.1%) received Gam-COVID-Vac as the first vaccine dose, followed by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (32.8%) and BBIBP-CorV (14.5%). Half of them (48.8%) were fully vaccinated with 2 doses; 12.5% received combined schemes, being the most frequent Gam-COVID-Vac/mRAN-1273. The median time between doses was 51 days (IQR 53). After the first dose, 25.9% of the patients reported at least one AE and 15.9% after the second, being flu-like syndrome and local hypersensitivity the most frequent manifestations. There was one case of anaphylaxis. Regarding efficacy, 63 events of SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported after vaccination, 19% occurred during the first 14 days post-vaccination, 57.1% after the first dose, and 23.8% after the second. Most cases (85.9%) were asymptomatic or mild and 2 died due to COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: In this national cohort of patients, the most common vaccines used were Gam-COVID-Vac and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. A quarter of the patients presented an AE and 5.1% presented SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination, in most cases mild. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the number: NCT04845997. Key Points ⢠This study shows real-world data about efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with rheumatic and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Interestingly, different types of vaccines were used including vector-based, mRNA, and inactivated vaccines, and mixed regimens were enabled. ⢠A quarter of the patients presented an adverse event. The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in those receiving mRAN-1273 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. ⢠In this cohort, 5.1% presented SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination, in most cases mild.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Argentina/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Femenino , Glucocorticoides , Humanos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Masculino , Metotrexato , Persona de Mediana Edad , Datos Preliminares , ARN Mensajero , Sistema de Registros , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Vacunas de Productos InactivadosRESUMEN
Objective: To compare the assessment of entheses in subjects with spondyloarthritis (SpA) with patients with gout by the Madrid Sonographic Enthesis Index (MASEI). Method: This cross-sectional study includes videos of entheses evaluated by ultrasound (US) of 30 patients with SpA diagnosed according to the ASAS criteria and 30 patients with gout established by the presence of monosodium urate crystals. Entheses were evaluated for MASEI in 2 Institutes located in two different countries. Demographic and clinical data were registered. Total MASEI score, MASEI-inflammatory, and MASEI-chronic damage were analyzed. Comparisons between groups were obtained by chi-square test and Student's t-test. An inter-reading US reliability was realized. Results: Patients with gout were older and had significantly more comorbidities than those with SpA. The total MASEI score was not significantly different among diseases (p = 0.07). MASEI-inflammatory was significantly more prevalent at the Achilles tendon in SpA, while the proximal patellar tendon was in gout. Power Doppler was higher in SpA compared to gout (p = 0.005). MASEI-chronic damage related to calcification/enthesophytes predominated in gout (p = 0.043), while calcaneal erosions did in SpA (p = 0.008). The inter-reader concordance was excellent (0.93, CI 95% 0.87-0.96, p = 0.001). Conclusions: SpA and gout similarly involve entheses according to MASE, however, some inflammatory and chronic lesions differ significantly depending on the underlying disease and tendon scanned.
RESUMEN
Introducción: la artritis reumatoidea (AR) y los tratamientos indicados para su manejo pueden afectar la respuesta a la vacuna para SARS-CoV-2. Sin embargo, aún no se cuenta con datos locales. Objetivos: evaluar la respuesta humoral de la vacuna para SARS-CoV-2 y su seguridad en esta población. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional. Se incluyeron pacientes ≥18 años, con AR ACR/EULAR 2010 que recibieron la vacunación para SARS-CoV-2. Detección de IgG anti-proteína S (kit COVIDAR). Resultados: se incluyeron 120 pacientes con AR. El 24,4% recibió tratamiento con glucocorticoides, 50,9% drogas biológicas y 13,3% inhibidores de JAK (janus kinases). El 6% había tenido infección por SARS-CoV-2 previamente. La vacuna más utilizada en la primera dosis fue Sputnik V (52,9%). El 25% recibió esquemas heterólogos. Luego de la primera dosis, el 59% presentó una prueba no reactiva o indeterminada, y un 18% luego de la segunda dosis. La aplicación de esquemas homólogos de vacuna Sinopharm (63,6% vs 13,3%, p<0,0001), y el uso de abatacept (27,3% vs 5,1%, p=0,005) y rituximab (18,2% vs 0%, p=0,001) al momento de la vacunación se asociaron a un resultado no reactivo o indeterminado. Conclusiones: similar a lo reportado en otras poblaciones internacionales, en esta cohorte, dos de cada 10 pacientes no desarrollaron anticuerpos. Una menor respuesta se asoció con la vacuna Sinopharm y al tratamiento con abatacept y rituximab.
Introduction: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its treatments can affect the response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. However, we still do not have local data. Objectives: to evaluate the humoral response of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and its safety in this population. Materials and methods: observational study. Patients ≥18 years of age, with RA ACR/EULAR 2010 who had received vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 were included. Detection of anti-protein S IgG (COVIDAR Kit). Results: a total of 120 patients with RA were included. A quarter was receiving glucocorticoids, 50.9% biological drugs and 13.3% JAK inhibitors (janus kinases). Only 6% had a history SARS-CoV-2 infection. The most used vaccine was Sputnik V (52.9%) and 25% received mixed regimenes. After the first dose, 59% had a non-reactive or indeterminate test, and after the second, 18% were still having this result. The application of homologous Sinopharm vaccine regimen (63.6% vs 13.3%, p<0.0001) and the use of abatacept (27.3% vs 5.1%, p=0.005) and rituximab (18.2% vs 0%, p=0.001) at vaccination was associated with a non-reactive or indeterminate result. Conclusions: similar to other international populations, in this cohort, two out of 10 patients did not develop antibodies. A lower response was associated with the Sinopharm vaccine and treatment with abatacept and rituximab.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , Inmunidad Humoral , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Estudios Longitudinales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Eficacia de las VacunasRESUMEN
En los últimos años, numerosas publicaciones ponderaron el uso de la US en el manejo diario de los pacientes con Artritis Reumatoidea (AR). Sin embargo, existe una tendencia actual de poner en dudas las diferentes posibilidades que brinda esta técnica, basados en algunas publicaciones, fortaleciendo el manejo clínico como principal sostén de nuestra práctica diaria
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
Estimado Editor: He leído con interés el artículo de García Salinas y cols. (Revista Argentina de Reumatología 2017; 28(3):15-19). Los autores reportan que, del total de RM realizadas, el 23% de los pedidos cumplían criterios de potencial derivación para EsPax, y que de estos, sólo el 4% había sido visto por el servicio de Reumatología. En realidad esto no sorprende, se sabe que si bien la lumbalgia es un síntoma de consulta frecuente, menos del 5% del dolor lumbar crónico (DLC) corresponde a EsPax
Asunto(s)
Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , EspondiloartritisRESUMEN
Objetivo: El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue evaluar la prevalencia de entesopatía subclínica en pacientes con psoriasis cutánea (Ps) utilizando un score ultrasonográfico (US) como herramienta diagnóstica en la práctica diaria y evaluar la habilidad de dicho score para discriminar pacientes con Ps y Artritis Psoriásica (APs). Material y Métodos: Se estudiaron pacientes con diagnóstico de Ps (según diagnóstico por dermatólogo), APs (según criterios CASPAR) y controles sanos (CS). Se evaluaron diez sitios de entesis (de manera bilateral): inserción del tendón del cuádriceps, tendón proximal y distal del ligamento patelar, tendón de Aquiles y fascia plantar. La US identificó los siguientes hallazgos: engrosamiento tendinoso, erosión ósea, entesofito, bursitis y señal Power Doppler (PD). Se calculó el score US para entesitis GUESS. El desempeño del score para discriminar entre APs y Ps se evaluó utilizando curvas ROC. Resultados: Se incluyeron 51 sujetos: APs=16, Ps=15 y CS=20. La edad media fue de 42±13 años y el 39% eran mujeres. La mitad de los pacientes con APs presentaron entesopatía clínica en comparación con ninguno de los otros grupos. Se evaluaron un total de 510 sitios de entesis (APs=160, Ps=150, HC=200). Los pacientes con Ps mostraron significativamente una mayor frecuencia de entesofitos, erosiones y PD que los CS. La puntuación media del score GUESS fue diferente entre los grupos (media±DE): APs=13±4, Ps=8±4, CS=3±2 (p<0,01). El área bajo la curva (ABC) para el diagnóstico de APs fue de 0,79 (IC95%=0,63 a 0,95). Conclusiones: Los pacientes con Ps mostraron una alta frecuencia de entesopatía subclínica en la evaluación US. El score GUESS mostró una alta sensibilidad y moderada especificidad para discriminar entre los pacientes con APs y Ps
Asunto(s)
Psoriasis , Artritis Psoriásica , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of subclinical ankle involvement by ultrasound in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The study was conducted on 216 patients with RA and 200 healthy sex- and age-matched controls. Patients with no history or clinical evidence of ankle involvement underwent US examination. For each ankle, tibio-talar (TT) joint, tibialis anterior (TA) tendon, extensor halux (EH) and extensor common (EC) tendons, tibialis posterior (TP) tendon, flexor common (FC) tendon and flexor hallux (FH) tendon, peroneous brevis (PB) and longus (PL) tendons, Achilles tendon (AT) and plantar fascia (PF) were assessed. The following abnormalities were recorded: synovitis, tenosynovitis, bursitis, enthesopathy and rupture. BMI, DAS28, RF ESR and CRP were also obtained. A total of 432 ankles of patients with RA and 400 ankles of healthy controls were assessed. In 188 (87%) patients with RA, US showed ankle abnormalities whereas, in control group, US found abnormalities in 57 (28.5 %) subjects (p = 0.01). The most frequent US abnormality in RA patients was TP tenosynovits (69/216) (31.9 %), followed by PL tenosynovitis (58/216) (26.9 %), TT synovitis (54/216) (25 %), PB tenosynovitis (51/216) (23.6 %), AT enthesopathy (41/216) (19 %) and AT bursitis (22/216) (10.2 %). In 118 RA patients out of 216 (54.6%), a positive PD was found. No statistically significant correlation was found between the US findings and age, disease duration, BMI, DAS28, RF, ESR and CRP. The present study provides evidence of the higher prevalence of subclinical ankle involvement in RA patients than in age- and gender-matched healthy controls identified by US.
Asunto(s)
Articulación del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Bursitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Sinovitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Tenosinovitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Bursitis/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Sinovitis/epidemiología , Tenosinovitis/epidemiología , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
El complejo articular de tobillo y pie es frecuentemente afectado por artropatías tanto inflamatorias como mecánicas y es una de las principales causas de consulta en reumatología. Usualmente la evaluación clínica se debe complementar con métodos de imagen diagnósticos; la radiografía convencional no provee imágenes de las múltiples estructuras tendinosas y ligamentosas, y el uso de la resonancia magnética se ve limitado por su costo. El ultrasonido provee imágenes en tiempo real, a bajo costo y de manera dinámica de las estructuras de tejidos blandos de tobillo y pie, lo que lo hace un método auxiliar diagnóstico de extrema importancia. En este artículo abordamos las características ultrasonográficas normales de las articulaciones de tobillo y pie y revisamos su exploración sistemática.
The foot and ankle joints are frequently affected by both inflammatory and mechanical arthropathies, these are a major cause of outpatient visits in rheumatology. Usually the clinical evaluation must be complemented by diagnostic imaging methods. Conventional radiography does nor provide images of tendons and ligaments and the use of MRI is limited by its cost. Ultrasound provides real-time and dynamic images at low cost of soft tissues structures of the ankle and foot articular complex and thus makes it an imaging method of extreme importance in its assessment. This article depicts the systematic evaluation and the normal ultrasonographic features of ankle and foot joints.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Pie/anatomía & histología , Pie , Tobillo/anatomía & histología , TobilloRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Analyze disability determinants in a cohort of Argentine patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with RA, according to ACR'87 criteria, were recruited from 6 rheumatology centers. Demographic and socioeconomic data, family history, comorbid diseases, extra-articular manifestations and information about received treatments were provided. Disease activity was assessed using Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)-A was used for the functional capacity. Hand and feet radiographs were assessed using Sharp-van der Heijde score. RESULTS: A total of 640 patients with RA were included, of which 85.2% were females. Mean age was 53 years (interquartile range [IQR], 44-62) and mean disease duration was 8 years (IQR, 4-14). DAS 28 mean was 2.72 (IQR, 1.7-3.7) and HAQ-A mean was 0.62 (IQR, 0.13-1.25). Multiple linear regression showed that the main variables associated with disability were DAS 28, radiologic damage and age. Main predictors of functional disability in the multiple logistic regression using severe HAQ (>2) as dependent variable were DAS 28 (OR, 2; P < 0.0001); age (OR, 1; P = 0.008); and structural damage (OR, 1; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this population, the disease activity was the variable that showed the highest impact on the physical function. Radiologic damage affected HAQ as the disease progressed.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Argentina , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Articulaciones del Pie/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulaciones de la Mano/diagnóstico por imagen , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , RadiografíaRESUMEN
Introducción: Actualmente numerosos estudios demuestran la efectividad de los agentes anti-TNF¦Á para mejorar la actividad y la capacidad funcional en pacientes con espondiloartropatías seronegativas (EASN). Objetivos: Evaluar eficacia y seguridad de la terapia biológica con agentes anti-TNF en pacientes con EASN del Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica (IREP). Materiales y m todos: Se incluyeron pacientes con diagnóstico de EASN (criterios Europeos) en tratamiento con terapia biológica de la consulta ambulatoria del IREP. Se consignaron datos demográficos, clínicos, de laboratorio, e índices de la actividad de la enfermedad (BASDAI), capacidad funcional (BASFI), calidad de vida (ASQoL) previo y posterior al inicio de la terapia biológica. También se consignó efectos adversos y discontinuación del tratamiento. Resultados: Se incluyeron 21 pacientes; 13 pacientes recibían Etanercept, 5 Infliximab y 2 Adalimumab. Se observó una mejoría significativa de la actividad de la enfermedad (p=0,008), capacidad funcional (p=0,021) y calidad de vida (p=0,027). Con respecto a la clinimetría sólo se observó una diferencia significativa en la distancia dedo-piso (p=0,008). Conclusión: Observamos que el tratamiento con agentes Anti-TNF es efectivo para mejorar la capacidad funcional, controlar la actividad de la enfermedad y mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes con EASN con buena tolerancia y seguridad
Asunto(s)
Terapia Biológica , Espondiloartropatías , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Audiovestibular disorders have been described in several autoimmune diseases but have not been studied in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the audiovestibular function in patients with AS. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 22 consecutive patients with AS. Clinical, radiologic, and immunogenetic features were analyzed. All patients underwent a complete ear, nose, and throat physical examination and audiologic evaluation that included pure-tone audiometry thresholds at octave frequencies of 250 to 8000 Hz, impedance audiometry (tympanogram, static compliance, acoustic reflexes, and reflex decay), and speech audiometry. Thirty-one healthy volunteers and 26 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were included as controls. RESULTS: Patients with AS had a median age of 45.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 38-54) and a median disease duration of 20 years (IQR 12.5-26.2). Otosclerosis was observed in 2 patients with AS (9.1%), 3 patients with RA (11.5%), but not in any healthy controls (P = not significant). Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was observed in 13 patients with AS (59%), 17 patients with RA (65.4%), and 13 healthy controls (41.9%) without statistically significant differences. Because age can influence audiometric results, patients and controls were divided into 4 age groups. A higher frequency of SNHL was observed in patients with AS from 45 to 59 years compared with healthy controls and patients with RA (87% versus 20%, P = 0.03, versus 70%, P = not significant, respectively). CONCLUSION: Middle-aged patients with AS had a significantly higher frequency of SNHL compared with controls. SNHL should be considered as a possible complication of AS as well as of RA and other autoimmune diseases. Possible toxic effect of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs should also be considered in such patients.
Asunto(s)
Nervio Coclear/fisiopatología , Espondilitis Anquilosante/fisiopatología , Nervio Vestibular/fisiopatología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Audiometría , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Otosclerosis/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Espondilitis Anquilosante/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) is one of the most frequently used instruments to assess functional capacity in activities of daily living. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the reproducibility and validity of an Argentinean version of the HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with RA from 3 different provinces in Argentina were included. The original English version of the HAQ-DI was translated and adapted into Spanish by 3 rheumatologists and the final version back translated into English by a bilingual person. The reproducibility of the questionnaire was assessed in 30 patients who came for a second visit 3 to 5 days later. The cross-sectional construct validity was assessed by comparing the HAQ with classic parameters of disease activity (number of swollen and tender joints, patient and physician visual analog scale for pain and activity as well as functional class, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein. RESULTS: Two hundred patients with RA were included. The reproducibility was r = 0.97 (P = 1 x 10-5); intraitem correlation analysis did not show any redundancy. Correlation between HAQ-A and parameters of disease activity were all significant. A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the main variables associated with HAQ-A scores were visual analog scale for pain and duration of morning stiffness. A weak although significant negative correlation was found between the HAQ-A and economic level (r = -0.21, P = 0.03). The median time to complete the questionnaire was 5 minutes and there were no problems with any questions. CONCLUSION: This version of the HAQ-DI would allow for more availability so that Spanish-speaking countries can select the version most suitable to their sociocultural environment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a common cause of chronic disability in patients with quadriceps muscle weakness. Beneficial effects have been proposed for functional electrostimulation (FES) and exercise at the muscle level. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to begin to compare the effects of both therapeutic modalities on quadriceps muscle strength, pain, and functional capacity in patients with OA of the knee and to prove whether the combination of these modalities provides greater benefits than the use of each therapeutic modality alone. METHODS: This pilot study included 37 patients with OA of the knee who were assessed at baseline and at 8 weeks, accounting for the following variables: body mass index, knee pain (measured using a VAS), WOMAC, quadriceps strength (measured using a dynamometer) and 6-minute walk test. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: (A) 8 patients who received FES 3 times per week; (B) 10 patients recruited into a twice-a-week physical training program; and (C) 8 patients under combined therapy; 29.7% of patients were lost to follow-up due to noncompliance with the treatment plan, leaving a total of 26 patients at 8 weeks. RESULTS: Pain and WOMAC improved in all 3 groups; strength improved significantly in the exercise-only group; the FES + exercise combination improved strength significantly when compared with the individual therapeutic procedures. CONCLUSIONS: FES merits a larger placebo-controlled study as it may prove to be useful patients with OA of the knee; the combination with exercise was helpful in improving muscle strength. This technique may be considered in patients who are unable to carry out physical activity due to health problems or in those who are not interested in physical activity.