Detection of Global Brain Injury Using Point-of-Care Neonatal MRI Scanner.

BACKGROUND: Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) neuroimaging of infants is complicated by the need to transport infants outside the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), often to distant areas of the hospital. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to evaluate and compare scoring of images from a novel 1T MRI, which enables neuroimaging within the NICU, with those from a conventional MRI. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: The second aim of this study was to document improved expediency, and thereby greater patient safety, as reflected by decreased transport time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty premature infants (mean gestational age: 28.8 ± 2.1 weeks) were scanned consecutively on the novel 1T and 1.5T conventional scanners at term-equivalent age. Orthogonal T1- and T2-weighted images were acquired and reviewed. A global brain abnormality score (Kidokoro) was assigned independently to all images by two radiologists. Interrater agreement was evaluated using the kappa statistic and interscanner agreement was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis. Transport time to and from both scanners was monitored and compared. RESULTS: Weighted kappas were 0.77 (standard error of measurement [SEM] 0.08; confidence interval [CI]: 0.62-0.92) and 0.86 (SEM: 0.07; CI: 0.73-1), for the 1T and 1.5T scanners, respectively, reflecting substantial interrater agreement. Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent agreement between the two scanners.Transport time was 8 ± 6 minutes for the 1T MRI versus 46 ± 21 minutes for the conventional MRI (p < 0.00001). No adverse events were recorded during transport. Standard transport times will vary from institution to institution. CONCLUSION: Kidokoro scores are similar when comparing images obtained from a 1T MRI with those of a conventional 1.5T MRI, reflecting comparable image quality. Transport time was significantly decreased using the 1T neonatal MRI.

Acute Neuro-Functional Morbidity Upon Discharge From the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit After Critical Bronchiolitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Improved survival has shifted research focus toward understanding alternate PICU outcomes, including neurocognitive and functional changes. Bronchiolitis is a common PICU diagnosis, but its neuro-functional outcomes have not been adequately described in contemporary literature. The objective of the study is to describe the epidemiology and associated clinical characteristics of acute neuro-functional morbidity (ANFM) in critical bronchiolitis. METHODS: Patients <2 years old admitted with bronchiolitis between 2014 and 2016 were identified. Demographics, medical history, length of stay (LOS), and need for intubation were collected. Children with a history of neurologic illness or illness associated with neurologic sequelae were termed "high risk"; others were termed "low risk." ANFM was defined both at PICU and hospital discharge as the presence of swallowing difficulty, nasogastric tube feeds, hypotonia, or lethargy. Variables were compared by using χ2 and Wilcoxon rank tests. RESULTS: Among 417 children, 16.7% had ANFM, predominantly swallow difficulties (95.7%). Children with ANFM had lower weight (5.9 [4.4-8.2] vs 7.7 [5.5-9.7] kg, P = .001), longer LOS (6.6 [2.5-13.3] vs 1.9 [0.9-3.5] days, P < .001), intubation (51.4% vs 6.1%, P < .001) and high-risk status (37.1% vs 8.4%, P < .001). Among 362 low risk subjects, ANFM was identified in 44 (12%). In a multivariate logistic regression model, high-risk status, intubation, and ICU LOS were associated with ANFM. ANFM persisted to hospital discharge in 46% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: One out of 6 patients with critical bronchiolitis had documentation consistent with ANFM at PICU discharge. Risk factors included previous neurologic conditions, longer LOS, and intubation. Many were low-risk and/or did not require intubation, indicating a risk for neuro-functional morbidities despite moderate acuity.

Prevalence and factors associated with cognitive deficit in women with gynecologic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive impairment has implications in counseling, treatment, and survivorship for women with gynecologic malignancies. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors associated with cognition in women with gynecologic malignancies. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, 165 women at an urban ambulatory gynecologic oncology facility were queried using a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Wong-Baker pain scale, neuropathy scale, Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) Depression Scale, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD 7). Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to evaluate the association of cognitive deficit with age, education, race/ethnicity, disease site, stage, treatment, pain, neuropathy, anxiety, and depression. RESULTS: The mean MoCA score for the entire cohort was 24.1 (range 13-30.) 24% of patients had MoCA scores less than 22. Low scores (<22) were associated with older age, non-white race/ethnicity, lower education level, uterine and vulvar cancers, and pain ≥5 (p<0.05). There was a trend toward lower cognition scores for women treated with both chemotherapy and radiation (p=0.10). While clinically significant pain was associated with low cognition, there was no association with use of opioid pain medication and low cognition scores. CONCLUSIONS: There was a high prevalence of cognitive deficit in women with gynecologic malignancies. The association of low cognition with report of clinically significant pain, but not with use of opioid pain medications, should be further explored. Research is needed to evaluate the impact of cognitive deficits on treatment adherence and outcomes for women with gynecologic malignancies.