OPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual Data Report: Deceased Organ Donors.

SRTR uses data collected by OPTN to calculate metrics such as donation rate, organ yield, and rate of organs recovered for transplant but not transplanted. In 2019, there were 11,870 deceased donors, an increase from 10,721 in 2018; this number has been increasing since 2010. The number of deceased donor transplants increased to 32,313 in 2019, from 29,675 in 2018; this number has been increasing since 2012. The increase may be due in part to the rising number of deaths of young people due to the ongoing opioid epidemic. The number of organs transplanted included 17,425 kidneys, 1,018 pancreata, 8,275 livers, 81 intestines, 3,604 hearts, and 2,607 lungs. In 2019, 4,324 kidneys, 346 pancreata, 867 livers, 5 intestines, 31 hearts, and 148 lungs were discarded. These numbers suggest an opportunity to increase numbers of transplants by reducing discards.

OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual Data Report: Deceased Organ Donation.

SRTR uses data collected by OPTN to calculate metrics such as donation rate, organ yield, and rate of organs recovered for transplant but not transplanted. In 2018, there were 10,721 deceased donors, and this number has been increasing since 2010. The number of deceased donor transplants increased to 29,676 in 2018 from 28,582 in 2017, and this number has been increasing since 2012. The recent increase may be due in part to the rising number of deaths of young people due to the opioid epidemic. In 2018, 4994 organs were discarded, slightly more than 4813 in 2017. In 2018, 3755 kidneys, 278 pancreata, 707 livers, 3 intestines, 23 hearts, and 317 lungs were discarded. These numbers suggest an opportunity to increase numbers of transplants by reducing discards.

OPTN/SRTR 2017 Annual Data Report: Deceased Organ Donation.

SRTR uses data collected by OPTN to calculate metrics such as donation rate, organ yield, and rate of organs recovered for transplant but not transplanted. In 2017, 1,085,646 death and imminent death referrals were made to organ procurement organizations, of which 22,265 met the definition of eligible (11,673) or imminent neurological (10,592) deaths per OPTN policy. There were 10,286 deceased donors, and this number has been increasing since 2010. The number of organs authorized for recovery has also continued to increase since 2010. The recent increase may be in part due to the rising number of deaths of young individuals due to the opioid epidemic. In 2017, 4813 organs were discarded, including 3542 kidneys, 309 pancreata, 742 livers, 4 intestines, 33 hearts, and 272 lungs. These numbers suggest a need to reduce the number of organs discarded.

OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Deceased Organ Donation.

SRTR uses data collected by OPTN to calculate metrics such as donation rate, organ yield, and rate of organs recovered for transplant but not transplanted. In 2016, 1,072,717 death and imminent death referrals were made to organ procurement organizations, of which 23,433 met the definition of eligible (10,717) or imminent (12,716) deaths per OPTN policy. There were 9971 deceased donors, and this number has been increasing since 2010. The number of organs authorized for recovery has also continued to increase since 2010. In 2016, 4859 organs were discarded, including 3631 kidneys, 317 pancreata, 739 livers, 8 intestines, 31 hearts, and 211 lungs. These numbers suggest a need to reduce the number of organs discarded.

OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Deceased Organ Donation.

SRTR uses data collected by OPTN to calculate metrics such as donation/conversion rate, organ yield, and rate of organs recovered for transplant but not transplanted. In 2015, 1,072,828 death and imminent death referrals were made to Organ Procurement Organizations, of which 21,559 met the definition of eligible (9793) or imminent (11,766) deaths per OPTN policy. The number of deceased donors was 9080, and this number has been increasing since 2010. The number of organs authorized for recovery increased slightly to 65,086 in 2015, and the number recovered increased slightly to 25,762. In 2015, 4370 organs were discarded, including 3157 kidneys, 311 pancreata, 703 livers, 30 hearts, and 214 lungs. These numbers suggest a need to reduce the number of organs discarded.

Deceased Organ Donation.

SRTR uses data collected by OPTN to calculate metrics such as donation/conversion rate, organ yield, and rate of organs recovered for transplant but not transplanted. In 2014, 9252 eligible deaths were reported by organ procurement organizations, a slight increase from 8944 in 2012, and the donation/conversation rate was 73.4 eligible donors per 100 eligible deaths, a slight increase from 71.3 in 2013. Some metrics show variation across organ procurement organizations, suggesting that sharing best practices could lead to gains in efficiency and organ retrieval.

OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: deceased organ donation.

The status of deceased organ donation is assessed using metrics such as donation/conversation rate, organ yield, and rate of organs recovered for transplant and not transplanted. These metrics are based on eligible deaths (brain death of a person aged 70 years or younger) as well as on actual donors. The 9132 eligible deaths reported in 2013 represented a slight increase over 2012. The donation/conversion rate was 71.3 eligible donors per 100 eligible deaths, a slight decline from 2012, and varied by donation service area from 50.0 to 87.0. The number of organs recovered per donor, 3.55, also varied by donation service area, from 2.79 to 4.10. The mean number of organs transplanted per donor was 3.08 in 2013, slightly higher than 3.02 in 2012. The mean observed/expected organ yield ratio for kidneys varied from 0.86 to 1.18; for pancreata, from 0.29 to 2.59; for livers, from 0.69 to 1.17; for hearts, from 0.68 to 1.41; and for lungs, from 0.33 to 1.41. The rate of organs recovered for transplant and not transplanted in 2013 for all organs combined was 0.13 per recovered organ, slightly lower than the rate of 0.14 in 2012.

OPTN/SRTR 2012 Annual Data Report: deceased organ donation.

The status of deceased organ donation is assessed using several metrics, including donation/conversion rate (how often at least one organ is recovered for transplant from an eligible death), organ yield (ratio of observed/expected numbers of organs transplanted), and rate of organs discarded (number of organs discarded divided by the number of organs recovered for transplant). The 2012 donation/conversion rate was 72.5. eligible donors per 100 eligible deaths, slightly lower than the 2011 rate but higher than in previous years. The 2011-2012 yield ratio varied by donation service area from 0.91 (fewer organs transplanted per donor than expected) to 1.09 (more than expected), and also varied for specific organs. The mean number of organs transplanted per donor in 2012 was 3.02, lower than in 2011 and 2010; this number varied by donation service area from 2.04 to 3.76. The number of organs discarded is calculated by subtracting the number of organs transplanted from the number recovered for transplant; this number is used to calculate the discard rate. The discard rate in 2012 for all organs combined was 0.14 per recovered organ, slightly higher than in 2011 and 2011; it varied by donation service area and organ type.

Optimizing recovery, utilization and transplantation outcomes for kidneys from small, ≤20 kg, pediatric donors.

The optimal balance between maximizing the number versus the outcome of transplantation utilizing kidneys from small (≤20 kg) pediatric donors remains unclear, complicated by the choice of single versus en bloc transplantation with their attendant technical risks. Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database, we examined kidney recovery and utilization patterns, and 1-year transplant outcomes by single kilogram weight strata. Between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2010, 2352 kidneys from ≤20 kg donors were transplanted into 1531 recipients, 710 single kidney transplants (SKTs) and 821 en bloc kidney transplants (EBKTs). Increased donor weight was associated with higher rates of recovery, transplantation and SKT. Low donor weight (linear p < 0.001; quadratic p = 0.003), SKT versus EBKT (p = 0.008), increased cold ischemia time (p = 0.003), local versus nonlocal donor (p = 0.0044), low versus high volume center (p = 0.003) and the interaction term between center volume and donor weight (p = 0.0024) were associated with graft failure. Notably, lower donor weight exacerbated the negative impact of low center volume but did not worsen the negative impact of SKT on outcomes. Our data show that EBKT offers superior 1-year survival at the expense of accomplishing one rather than two transplants. However, SKTs yield excellent outcomes when performed at experienced centers.

OPTN/SRTR 2011 Annual Data Report: deceased organ donation.

In 2011, the number of eligible deaths (death of a patient aged 70 years or younger who is legally declared brain dead and does not exhibit any excluding factors) was 9023, a slight decrease from 2010; 72.9 eligible donors per 100 eligible deaths were converted to organ donors. The unadjusted donation rate varied by donation service area (DSA), as did the number of transplant programs. The observed/expected organ yield ratio for all organs varied by DSA from 0.89 to 1.13. The total number of organs recovered divided by the number of donors was 3.54, slightly lower than in 2010; this value varied by DSA from 2.91 to 4.19. The number of organs transplanted per donor was 3.07, varying by DSA from 2.28 to 3.37. The discard rate for all organs combined was 0.13 per recovered organ, a value that varied substantially by DSA and by organ type. Reasons for not procuring or for discarding organs varied by organ type. Numbers of intestines, hearts, and lungs procured for transplant but not used are smaller than numbers of kidneys, pancreata, and livers because intestines, hearts, and lungs are recovered only after a transplant center has accepted the organ for transplant.

Visualization at supercomputing centers: the tale of little big iron and the three skinny guys.

Supercomputing centers are unique resources that aim to enable scientific knowledge discovery by employing large computational resources-the "Big Iron." Design, acquisition, installation, and management of the Big Iron are carefully planned and monitored. Because these Big Iron systems produce a tsunami of data, it's natural to colocate the visualization and analysis infrastructure. This infrastructure consists of hardware (Little Iron) and staff (Skinny Guys). Our collective experience suggests that design, acquisition, installation, and management of the Little Iron and Skinny Guys doesn't receive the same level of treatment as that of the Big Iron. This article explores the following questions about the Little Iron: How should we size the Little Iron to adequately support visualization and analysis of data coming off the Big Iron? What sort of capabilities must it have? Related questions concern the size of visualization support staff: How big should a visualization program be-that is, how many Skinny Guys should it have? What should the staff do? How much of the visualization should be provided as a support service, and how much should applications scientists be expected to do on their own?

SRTR center-specific reporting tools: Posttransplant outcomes.

Measuring and monitoring performance--be it waiting list and posttransplant outcomes by a transplant center, or organ donation success by an organ procurement organization and its partnering hospitals--is an important component of ensuring good care for people with end-stage organ failure. Many parties have an interest in examining these outcomes, from patients and their families to payers such as insurance companies or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; from primary caregivers providing patient counseling to government agencies charged with protecting patients. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients produces regular, public reports on the performance of transplant centers and organ procurement organizations. This article explains the statistical tools used to prepare these reports, with a focus on graft survival and patient survival rates of transplant centers--especially the methods used to fairly and usefully compare outcomes of centers that serve different populations. The article concludes with a practical application of these statistics--their use in screening transplant center performance to identify centers that may need remedial action by the OPTN/UNOS Membership and Professional Standards Committee.

Organ procurement organization (OPO), best practices.

There are currently 59 organ procurement organizations (OPOs) in the United States which serve their assigned geographic areas with variable productivity. Knowledge of organizational characteristics, programs and practices of more successful OPOs may be useful to increase the productivity of less successful OPOs. A preliminary survey of all OPO executive directors in the United States ascertained the most important beneficial and detrimental factors affecting their success. Site visits were then conducted at OPOs based on a selection process utilizing population size, geographic location, minority population, donors per million population and donors per thousand deaths among potential donors. All OPOs were categorized and the highest ranking OPOs in each of seven categories, based on 4 years of national data, were selected for the site visits. Regression analysis and correlation analysis using Pearson's product-moment correlation were performed. The survey to identify the important factors was returned by 47 (77%) of 61 OPOs existent in 1999. The most important beneficial factors identified by responding OPOs were adequate staffing and experience, allocation of responsibilities, hospital development and leadership. The most important detrimental factors were inadequate staffing and experience, poor donor hospital/transplant center/ OPO relationships and failure in the consent process. Site visits of the highest-ranking OPOs demonstrated all had respected, experienced leadership focused on the donation process; efficient mechanisms for resolving allocation or transplant center conflicts; systems for monitoring activity and tracking outcomes; excellent communication between OPO and transplant centers; open internal communication at all levels of the OPO; immediate, on-site response to vascular donor referrals; and volunteer support of public and/or professional education. Regression and correlation analysis demonstrated that as minority population increases, OPO performance declines (P < 0.03). Moreover, independent OPOs were associated with poorer performance regardless of minority population (P < 0.05). All of the successful OPOs visited had strong leadership, excellent donor hospital and transplant center relationships, well-developed communication and innovative methods to deal with their minority populations. Application of these practices within all OPOs could significantly enhance organ donation.

Organ donation in the United States: 1988-2000.

Based upon information reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing: 1. There were 5,985 cadaveric and 5,702 living donors recovered in 2000, a 47% and 213% increase, respectively, over those recovered in 1988. 2. The number of cadaveric donors aged 50 or older has increased from 12% of all donors in 1988 to 31% of all donors in 2000. 3. The typical cadaveric donor in 2000 was a white male with ABO blood type O between the ages of 18-34. In 2000, a typical living donor was a white female with ABO blood type O between the ages of 35-49. 4. Between 1988-2000, the percentage of minority donors increased for cadaveric donors (17% to 26%), and for living donors (24% to 31%). 5. The number of living donors who were either spouses or unrelated to the recipient increased from 4% in 1988 to 26% in 2000. 6. In 2000, California (9.6%) was most often listed as the state of residence for cadaveric donors, followed by Texas (7.7%) and Florida (7.3%). 7. In 2000, cadaveric donors were recovered most often on Tuesdays (15.0%), followed by Thursdays (14.8%) and Fridays (14.7%). 8. In 2000, living donors were recovered most often on Wednesdays (27.8%), followed by Tuesdays (26.7%) and Thursdays (19.9%). 9. In 2000, cadaveric donors were recovered most often in July (9.2%), followed by September (9.0%), January and April (8.7%). 10. In 2000, living donors were recovered most often in June (9.5%), followed by November (9.2%) and August (9.0%).

Impact of segmental grafts on pediatric liver transplantation--a review of the United Network for Organ Sharing Scientific Registry data (1990-1996).

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the relative impact of segmental grafts from cadaveric and living donors on outcomes in 3,409 pediatric transplants (<18 years) between 1990 and 1996. METHODS: Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Scientific registry data from 1990 to 1996 was performed. RESULTS: Liver grafts consisted of 2,636 whole grafts (WLG), 246 liver donor grafts (LDG), 89 split liver graft (SLG), and 438 reduced-size grafts (RSG). Although the number of pediatric transplants were unchanged between 1990 and 1996, segmental grafts made up an increasing proportion from 14.5% to 29.2%, and WLG decreased proportionately. The increase among segmental grafts occurred for LDG (threefold), followed by SLG (53%) and RSG (50%). One-year graft and patient survival rates for 3,409 transplants were 69.7% and 81.9%, respectively and were significantly higher (P<.001) in nonhospitalized patients than in hospitalized patients (79.8% and 91.3% v 61.0% and 73.7%). LDG graft survival (75.9%) was comparable with WLG(70.9%) but significantly better at 1 year than SLG (60.3%, P = .007) and RSG (61.1%, P = .001), even after excluding retransplants and ICU patients. Patient survival rates were not different statistically between groups. A separate analysis of outcomes in recipients less than 1 year of age suggested significantly better graft and patient survivals for LDG (83.3% and 89.4%) than for WLG (62.3% and 76.5%) and RSG (62.7% and 75%). CONCLUSIONS: Segmental liver grafts from cadaveric and living donors constitute an increasing proportion of pediatric transplants. Survival rates of cadaveric segmental graft are inferior to those of live donor segmental grafts even after adjustment for medical condition. Live donor grafts demonstrate consistently superior graft and patient outcomes in pediatric recipients less than 1 year of age, and should be promoted aggressively as a solution to the critical shortage of size matched grafts in small recipients.

Worldwide thoracic organ transplantation: a report from the UNOS/ISHLT International Registry for Thoracic Organ Transplantation.

1. The number of heart transplant operations performed in the US has increased by 51 procedures between 1997 (2,294) and 1998 (2,345). The number of lung transplants decreased by 67 in 1998 (862). 2. The most frequently reported indication for heart transplantation in the US is coronary artery disease (44.6%). For other thoracic transplants, the most frequently reported indications include other/unknown (43.9%) for double lung, emphysema/COPD (53.5%) for single lung and other/unknown (53.2%) for heart-lung. The most frequently reported diagnoses for thoracic transplantation outside the US include cardiomyopathy (50.5%) for heart, cystic fibrosis (32.0%) for double lung, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (32.7%) for single lung and congenital heart disease (24.7%) for heart-lung. 3. US heart transplant recipients were predominately male (77%), between 50-64 years old (51.4%) and White (81.7%). In contrast, US lung transplant recipients are predominantly female (51.3%), between 50-64 years of age (44.7%) and White (89.7%). No meaningful variance from the US recipient demographic profile was noted for the non-US recipients during the same time period. 4. Pediatric recipients (< 18 years of age) received 10.9% of the reported heart transplants and 6.5% of reported lung transplants. 5. One-year survival for thoracic transplants performed in the US was 83.2% for heart, 70.6% for lung and 62.5%. Five-year survival for US thoracic transplants was 70% for heart and 49.1% for lung. 6. Long-term patient survival rates were: 22.3% at 18 years for heart, 20% at 9 years for lung and 25% at 12 years for heart-lung recipients. 7. The most important risk factor for mortality of US heart recipients at one month, one and 5 years after transplantation was receipt of a previous heart transplant. Significant short-term risk factors included donor age, recipient age and ischemic time. Substantial long-term risk factors include older donor age, donor race and recipient race. 8. The factors having the most significant impact on lung mortality at all time points were related to either the patient's medical condition (e.g., in the ICU prior to transplant, requiring mechanical ventilation) or diagnosis. 9. Mechanical ventilation and previous transplant had the largest impact on heart-lung mortality. 10. For heart and lung recipients, the major cause of hospitalization during the first posttransplant year was infection.

Organ donation in the United States: 1990-1998.

1. There were 5,799 cadaver and 4,274 living donors recovered in 1998, 29% and 101% increases, respectively, over those recovered in 1990. 2. The number of cadaver donors aged 50 or older has increased from 16% of all donors in 1990 to 29% of all donors in 1998. 3. The typical cadaver donor in 1998 was a White male with ABO blood type O between the ages of 18-34. In 1998, a typical living donor was a White female with ABO blood type O between the ages of 35-49. 4. Between 1990 and 1998, the percentage of minority donors increased for cadaver donors (18% to 24%), and for living donors (24% to 27%). 5. The number of living donors who were either spouses or unrelated to the recipient increased from 5% in 1990 to 18% in 1998. 6. California (10.2%) was most often listed as the state of residence for cadaver donors, followed by Texas (7.3%) and Florida (7.0%). 7. Cadaver donors are recovered most often on Tuesdays (15.2%), followed by Wednesdays (14.6%) and Fridays (14.3%). 8. Living donors are recovered most often on Wednesdays (32.4%), followed by Tuesdays (27.5%) and Thursdays (21.3%). 9. Cadaver donors are recovered most often in August and May (8.8%), followed by July and October (8.7%). 10. Living donors are recovered most often in June (10.5%), followed by July (10.0%) and August (8.3%). 11. In 1998, there were 21.4 donors recovered per million population in the United States.

Center-specific graft and patient survival rates: 1997 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) report.

CONTEXT: Multiple comprehensive, risk-adjusted studies evaluating short-term surgical mortality have been reported previously. This report analyzes short-term and long-term outcomes, both nationally and at each individual transplant program, for all solid organ transplantations performed in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To report graft and patient survival rates for all solid organ transplantations, both nationally and at each specific transplant program in the United States, and to compare the expected survival rate with the actual survival rate of each individual program. DESIGN AND SETTING: Multivariate regression analysis of donor and recipient factors affecting graft and patient survival of all kidney, liver, pancreas, heart, lung, and heart-lung transplants reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing from 742 separate transplant programs. PATIENTS: A cohort of 97587 solid organ transplantations performed on 92966 recipients in the United States from January 1988 through April 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term and conditional 3-year national and individual transplant program graft and patient survival rates overall and from 2 separate eras (era 1, January 1988-April 1992; era 2, May 1992-April 1994); comparison of actual center-specific performance with risk-adjusted expected performance and identification of centers with better-than-expected or worse-than-expected survival rates. RESULTS: One-year graft follow-up exceeded 98% and conditional 3-year follow-up exceeded 91% for all organs. Graft and patient survival improved significantly in era 2 compared with era 1 for all cadaver organs except heart, which remained the same. One-year cadaveric graft survival ranged from 81.5% for heart to 61.9% for heart-lung and 3-year conditional graft survival ranged from 91.3% for pancreas to 74.7% for lung. The percentage of programs whose actual 1-year graft survival was not different from or was better than their risk-adjusted expected survival ranged from 98.3% for heart-lung to 75.7% for liver. Most kidney, liver, and heart programs whose actual survival was significantly less than expected performed small numbers (less than the national average) of transplantations per year. CONCLUSIONS: Graft and patient survival for solid organ transplantations showed improvement over time. Conditional 3-year graft and patient survival rates were approximately 90% for all organs except for lung and heart-lung. The conditional 3-year survival rates were better than 1-year survival rates, indicating the major risk after transplantation occurs in the first year. The majority of transplant programs achieved actual survival rates not significantly different from their expected survival rates. Center effects were most significant within the first year after transplantation and had much less influence on long-term survival outcomes.

The UNOS OPTN waiting list and donor registry.

1. On October 31, 1998, there were 62,994 registrants on the combined UNOS waiting list. Of these, 66% were awaiting kidney transplantation, and 18% were awaiting liver transplantation. 2. The majority of patients on the UNOS waiting list on October 31, 1998 were blood type O (52%), White (60%) and male (58%). 3. Median waiting times (MWTs) have increased steadily for nearly every organ since 1988, especially for liver, kidney, and lung registrants. 4. For patients added to the waiting list in 1996. MWTs to transplant were longest for heart-lung registrants (742 days). The shortest waiting times for this cohort were among heart registrants (223 days). No median could be calculated for kidney registrants added in 1996. 5. Death rates per patients waiting at risk declined during 1988-1997. Death rates were higher for patients awaiting life-saving organs (liver, heart, lung, heart-lung) than for non-lifesaving organs (kidney, pancreas, kidney-pancreas). 6. There were 5,478 cadaveric and 3,820 living donors recovered in 1997, a 34% and 109% increase over those recovered in 1988. 7. Large increases were seen in the number of liver (45-84%), pancreas (14-24%), and lung (3-15%) donors between 1988-1997. 8. The number of cadaveric donors aged 50 or older has increased from 12% of all donors in 1988 to 28% of all donors in 1997. 9. The typical cadaveric donor in 1997 was a white male with ABO blood type O, between the ages of 18-34. In 1997, a typical living donor was a white female with ABO blood type O between the ages of 35-49. 10. Between 1988-1997, the percentage of minority donation increased for cadaveric donors (17-24%), and for living donors (23-27%). 11. The number of living donors who were either spouses or unrelated to the recipient increased from 4% in 1988 to 15% in 1997.