Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Radiol ; 59(8): 953-958, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29202584

RESUMEN

Background Acute portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) is a potentially life-threatening condition and urgent treatment is required. Purpose To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of treating acute PMVT by the creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) followed by thrombectomy. Material and Methods Six patients (all men, age range = 39-51 years) presenting with acute PMVT were treated with transjugular thrombectomy (TT) through a TIPS created in the same session. The intervention included iterated venography through the TIPS one to three times within the first week after diagnosis and repeated thrombectomy if needed (n = 5). Results Recanalization was successful with persistent blood flow through the main superior mesenteric vein, portal vein, and TIPS in all six patients. Five patients were treated primarily with thrombectomy through a TIPS with clinical improvement. The final patient was initially treated with surgical thrombectomy and bowel resection. TIPS and TT was performed two days after surgery due to re-thrombosis but the patient deteriorated and died of multi-organ failure. Procedure-related complications were transient hematuria (n = 3) and transient encephalopathy (n = 2). In-hospital time was <14 days in four of the five patients with primary TIPS and TT. No sign of re-thrombosis was noted during follow-up (mean = 18 months, range = 8-28 months). Conclusion Thrombectomy through a TIPS is feasible and can be effective in recanalization and symptom-relief in acute PMVT.


Asunto(s)
Venas Mesentéricas/cirugía , Vena Porta/cirugía , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/métodos , Trombectomía/métodos , Trombosis de la Vena/cirugía , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 28(6): 656-60, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26958788

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) has shifted from mainly medical treatment, with surgical shunt and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) as rescue, to medical treatment combined with an early endovascular intervention in the past two decades. PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficiency of endovascular treatment of symptomatic patients with BCS and to compare mortality with symptomatic BCS patients in the same region treated with only sporadic endovascular techniques. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of clinical data, treatment and survival in 14 patients diagnosed with BCS and treated with endovascular methods from 2003 to 2015. A national epidemiology study of BCS from 1986 to 2003 was used for comparison. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 14 patients eventually had transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), four after previous liver vein angioplasty. TIPS were performed with polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents and technical success was 100%. Calculated preinterventional prognostic indices indicated a high risk of TIPS dysfunction, OLT and death. However, only one patient died and one had an OLT, and the 1- and 2-year primary TIPS-patency was 85 and 67%, respectively. Episodes of de-novo hepatic encephalopathy occurred in three patients. Overall 1- and 5-year transplantation-free survival was 100 and 93% compared with 47 and 28%, respectively, in 1986 to 2003. CONCLUSION: TIPS seems to be a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic BCS and there is an obvious improvement in transplantation-free survival compared with conservatory medical treatment. It should, therefore, be considered early, as first-line intervention, in patients with insufficient response to medical treatment.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Budd-Chiari/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Hipertensión Portal/cirugía , Trasplante de Hígado/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/métodos , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Angioplastia , Ascitis/etiología , Síndrome de Budd-Chiari/complicaciones , Síndrome de Budd-Chiari/mortalidad , Intervención Médica Temprana , Femenino , Venas Hepáticas/cirugía , Síndrome Hepatorrenal/etiología , Humanos , Hipertensión Portal/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Politetrafluoroetileno , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Adulto Joven
3.
Acta Radiol ; 57(5): 572-9, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26253926

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) differs due to different etiology and wide range of symptoms but certain patients seems to benefit from endovascular intervention. PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficiency of endovascular treatment of acute and chronic PVT in patients with cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic liver. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with PVT treated with an endovascular procedure in 2002-2013 were studied retrospectively. Data on etiology, onset and extension of thrombus, presenting symptoms, methods of intervention, portal pressure gradients, complications, recurrence of symptoms, re-interventions, clinical status at latest follow-up, and survival were collected. RESULTS: Four non-cirrhotic patients with acute extensive PVT and bowel ischemia were treated with local thrombolysis, in three combined with placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement. Three recovered and have survived more than 6 years. In six non-cirrhotic patients with chronic PVT and acute or threatening variceal bleeding recanalization and TIPS were successful in three and failed in three. Eleven cirrhotic patients with PVT and variceal bleeding or refractory ascites were successfully treated with recanalization and TIPS. Re-intervention was performed in five of these patients and five patients died, three within 12 months of intervention. Four cirrhotic patients had episodes of shunt-related encephalopathy and three had variceal re-bleeding. CONCLUSION: TIPS was found to be effective in reducing portal hypertension in patients with PVT. In patients with extensive PVT and bowel ischemia treatment with TIPS combined with thrombolysis should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Vena Porta , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Transfusión Sanguínea , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Tasa de Supervivencia , Terapia Trombolítica , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...