Outcome of circumcision for newborns with penoscrotal web: oblique skin incision followed by penis shaft skin physical therapy shows success.

SHORT INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: and objectives: Although it is widely agreed that newborn circumcision complications are low when the penile anatomy is normal, outcomes are uncertain when a web of skin attaches the penis to the scrotum. This anomaly, called a penoscrotal web or webbed penis, often leads to surgical reconstruction instead of newborn circumcision. OBJECTIVE: With this study, the authors compare the circumcision success rate for webbed penis circumcisions using a new, alternate method vs that using the traditional method. STUDY DESIGN: Data from circumcision patients presenting to the Division of Urology's circumcision clinic from January 2014 to April 2018 were reviewed. All patients who met the checklist criteria for suitability to circumcise were enrolled in the study. They were grouped into the 'normal' group if they had no penile anomalies or the 'web' group if they had a web with a straight penis. Cases with penile anomalies were excluded. The new circumcision method includes altering the circumcision site planned to be oblique, slant up, to compensate for the web, retaining slightly more ventral than dorsal shaft skin, and including home care skin physical therapy as 'push down' the shaft skin. Postcircumcision evaluation was completed within 2 weeks after circumcision, and families were followed up as needed over the study period, six months after circumcision. Circumcision success was defined as the penis shaft no longer attached to the scrotum and circumcision line below the glans corona. RESULTS: Of 828 boys who presented for circumcision, 652 (79%) were enrolled as they were suitable for circumcision: 355 (43%) in the normal group and 297 (36%) in the web group. The remaining 176 (21%) were excluded because they presented with a penile anomaly: buried penis (125), chordee (40), and hypospadias (11). Follow-up was carried out for 6 months. In the web group, follow-up data were obtained for 263 of 297 (89%) cases, with 261 of 263 (99%) showing success, and in the normal group, follow-up data were obtained for 327 of 355 (92%) cases, with all 327 (100%) showing success. The two web group cases (0.7%) who failed had surgical reconstruction. DISCUSSION: It is believed the high success rate for penoscrotal web circumcisions with oblique incision followed by penis shaft skin physical therapy establishes that surgical reconstruction is not required in most of these cases. CONCLUSION: It was found that newborns with a penoscrotal web and straight shaft show 99% success for circumcision, which is not different from boys without any penile anomalies (p = not significant). The authors believe the adoption of these new, alternate circumcision methods will enable boys with a web to avoid surgical reconstruction.

Federal research funding and academic productivity in pediatric urology: from early career to research independence.

INTRODUCTION: Federal grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) are crucial for early career physician-scientists. Federal funding success has been explored in other surgical specialties, but has not been evaluated in pediatric urology. OBJECTIVE: To characterize factors associated with receipt of federal grants, hypothesizing that pediatric urologists who were have advanced research degree(s) were more likely to be federally funded. STUDY DESIGN: All pediatric fellowship graduates from 1985-2016 listed on the Societies for Pediatric Urology and institutional websites were queried using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools. Primary outcomes were successful receipt of federal grants and transition from mentor-based to independent funding. The secondary outcome was publication rate on PubMed as of November 2017. Covariables included advanced degree(s) (eg, PhD, MPH, MSc, etc), sex, and year of fellowship graduation (1985-2006 versus 2007-2016). RESULTS: Of 445 pediatric urologists (73% male), 36 (8%) were federal grant recipients. Of 18 mentor-based awardees, 9 (50%) transitioned to independent awards. After adjusting for sex and year of fellowship graduation, having an advanced degree(s) was associated with funding success for mentor-based awards (hazard ratio [HR] 3.83 [95% confidence interval, 1.21-12.14], p = 0.02; Summary Table) and independent awards (HR 3.11 [1.21-8.02], p = 0.02), and with higher publication rates (incident rate ratio [IRR] 2.03 [1.43-2.87], p < 0.001). Recent training (2007-2016) was also associated with higher publication rates (IRR 2.70 [2.16-3.37], p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Among fellowship-trained pediatric urologists in North America between 1985 and 2016, the prevalence of federal grant recipients was 8%. Pediatric urologists who had an advanced educational degree were more likely to be a federally funded grant recipient and have a higher publication rate. CONCLUSIONS: Fellowship programs should consider adding opportunities for self-selected applicants to pursue additional research training and degrees.

Attitudes toward 'Disorders of Sex Development' nomenclature among physicians, genetic counselors, and mental health clinicians.

INTRODUCTION: In 2006, nomenclature referencing atypical sex development (i.e., 'intersex') was updated, and the term disorder of sex development (DSD) was formally introduced. Clinicians, patients, and parents, however, have not universally accepted the new terminology, and some continue to use different nomenclature. This inconsistency in terminology can lead to confusion among clinicians and patients, affect clinician-patient relationships, and interfere with the recommended multidisciplinary model for DSD care. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to (1) evaluate frequency of use and comfort with specific DSD terminology, (2) assess why clinicians are not using specific terms, and (3) determine what terms are being heard within the medical community and by the public in a sample of physicians, genetic counselors, and licensed mental health clinicians. STUDY DESIGN: A Web-based survey assessing the use of DSD terminology was distributed to endocrinologists, urologists, genetic counselors, and mental health clinicians. The survey assessed frequency of use and comfort with specific terms, negative experiences related to specific nomenclature use, and the context in which terms are used (e.g. case conference, literature, patient/parents, and media). A qualitative analysis of open-ended responses was conducted to characterize reasons for avoiding specific terms. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 286 clinicians. There were significant differences between specialties in comfort and frequency of use of specific terms, and significant differences were based on clinician gender, patient volume, length of time in practice, and practice setting. The study results also showed a difference in the nomenclature used within the medical community versus the media. DISCUSSION: Study findings are consistent with previous research exploring medical professionals' use of the new term: disorder of sex development. However, there continues to be inconsistency in the uptake of this new terminology. Words that have been purposed in the literature to replace disorder, such as difference and variation, would be accepted by clinicians, and the word divergent would not. This study expands on the existing literature documenting high uptake of disorder of sex development nomenclature among medical professionals. In addition, this study demonstrates that the most common diagnostic terms used by the medical community are not the same terms being presented to the public by the media. CONCLUSION: Medical professionals have varying preferences for terminology use when describing DSD, which can affect patient care. These results can be used in the future to compare with what patients and advocates prefer to develop a more universally accepted approach to nomenclature.

Anatomic findings associated with epispadias in boys: Implications for surgical management and urinary continence.

INTRODUCTION: Pre-operative physical examination of male epispadias allows for classification of epispadias level as glanular (GE), penile (PE) or penopubic (PPE), and for delineation of anatomic anomalies. The incidence of associated extragenital abnormalities, such as vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), bladder neck (BN) abnormality and abnormal pubic diastasis (PD), and their impact on urinary continence has not yet been systematically studied. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the more proximal level of epispadias correlated with associated extragenital anatomic anomalies seen on initial imaging or endoscopic evaluation, and whether these pre-operative findings contributed to subsequent surgical management and impacted on achieving urinary continence. It was hypothesized that the more severe forms of epispadias may be associated with a higher frequency of associated anomalies. STUDY DESIGN: The study was an IRB-approved, retrospective case study of all male patients treated initially for isolated epispadias at the current institution between 1994 and 2011. Data collection was achieved by chart and radiology review evaluating PD, BN appearance, presence of VUR, surgical treatment, and urinary continence. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were identified and divided into three groups based on appearance at physical examination: four glanular (GE), eight penile (PE), and 14 penopubic (PPE); 17 patients had an abnormal BN. Reflux was noted in nine of 20 patients who had a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), two of which had an episode of pyelonephritis. Of the 22 patients past the age of toilet training, 17 were continent (64% (9/14) penopubic, 63% (5/8) penile, and 75% (3/4) glanular). DISCUSSION: Anatomic classification for male epispadias did not provide sufficient information regarding extragenital findings. This study provided new information regarding PD, BN appearance, presence of reflux, and ultimate urinary continence. Pubic diastasis and BN abnormalities were more frequently seen in more severe forms of epispadias, whereas VUR seemed more prevalent in less severe forms. A template for pre-operative evaluation was outlined. Limitations of the study were its retrospective design and relatively small cohort of patients, which reflected the rarity of the condition. CONCLUSION: Based on the information generated, additional anatomic information was generated regarding boys with epispadias. This information will help guide the evaluation and the management of these patients in the future.

Lipomyelomeningocele for the urologist: Should we view it the same as myelomeningocele?

INTRODUCTION: The primary urologic objectives for lipomyelomeningocele (LMM) and myelomeningocele (MM) are preserving renal integrity and achieving continence. Due to this common ground, LMM and MM are urologically treated the same. However, unlike MM, LMM may present with no evident functional concerns. Indications for and timing of tethered cord release (TCR) in LMM are therefore controversial. Long-term urologic outcomes are not well defined. OBJECTIVE: Expectations for continence and potential for intermittent catheterization (CIC) following TCR in LMM are important for realistically counseling families regarding future needs. The present study aimed to identify prognostic factors for continence and need for CIC in LMM. STUDY DESIGN: The present study retrospectively identified 143 patients from the multidisciplinary clinic who underwent TCR for LMM between 1995 and 2010. Concomitant anorectal/genitourinary anomalies, filar lipoma, fatty filum, previous TCR, and follow-up <1 year were excluded. Analysis was limited to those toilet trained or aged ≥6 years at latest follow-up. Lipomyelomeningocele was classified as dorsal, distal, transitional or chaotic. Pre- and post-TCR urologic status was assessed. Ability to achieve urinary continence, with or without CIC, was the primary outcome, and need for CIC was the secondary outcome of interest. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age at TCR was 4.4 months (range 1.0-224.0) with a median follow-up of 10.7 years (range 1.3-19.1); 68% were asymptomatic at presentation. Clinical symptoms were urologic in 7%. At the latest follow-up, 86% of patients were continent spontaneously or with CIC (Summary Fig.). Of the four patients who presented with urologic symptoms, all were continent, but three required CIC. Overall, 23% of patients required CIC. Median age at CIC initiation was 7.6 years (range 1.6-17.4). Long-term continence was not associated with any demographic, anatomic, surgical or functional variable. Need for CIC at latest follow-up was associated with symptomatic presentation, partial TCR, transitional lipoma, and high-risk pre-operative urodynamics. DISCUSSION: In this series of primary TCR for LMM, where 93% of patients were urologically asymptomatic before TCR, prospects for continence were excellent. No studied parameter clearly impacted continence; however, need for CIC was associated with multiple variables. CONCLUSIONS: Clear predictors for continence after TCR will require additional long-term patient outcomes. Families can anticipate 23% likelihood of CIC, which is considerably less than in MM, but long-term urologic follow-up is still strongly recommended.

Sacral agenesis and neurogenic bladder: Long-term outcomes of bladder and kidney function.

BACKGROUND: Sacral agenesis (SA) is a rare congenital condition that refers to the absence of part or all of two or more lower sacral vertebral bodies. It can be associated with neurogenic bladder dysfunction that does not necessarily correlate with the level of spinal or skeletal defect. Patients with SA should undergo urodynamic studies (UDS) to guide lower urinary tract (LUT) management. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to update the present institutional experience since 1981 of this rare patient population with detailed, long-term follow-up of bladder and kidney function. STUDY DESIGN: A single institution, retrospective, IRB-approved review was performed on patients born after January 1, 1981 with an isolated diagnosis of sacral agenesis without spina bifida, and followed with urologic involvement at Boston Children's Hospital. Records were reviewed for demographics, radiologic imaging, UDS including cystometrogram (CMG) and electromyography (EMG), surgery, and blood chemistries. Comparisons were made between groups of patients based on age at diagnosis, with specific focus on renal function and stability of neurogenic bladder lesion. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were identified: 23 female and 20 male. Thirty-seven children (86%) had a known age of diagnosis. Nineteen were diagnosed before 2 months old, including five who were diagnosed prenatally, 11 were diagnosed between 2 and 18 months, and seven were diagnosed after 18 months. All 43 had UDS, with 24 (55.8%) studied at the time of diagnosis (Summary Table). Twenty had serial full UDS, with 30% demonstrating neurourologic instability. None developed end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or required spinal cord detethering. DISCUSSION: Many children with SA appeared to be diagnosed prenatally or early in life; SA was mostly identified during evaluation of associated anomalies. Though UDS aid in urologic management, testing was not routinely utilized at the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This review of long-term follow-up in SA patients showed stable LUT and renal function, with minimal risk of progression to ESRD.

The effect of spinal cord level on sexual function in the spina bifida population.

INTRODUCTION: Sexual dysfunction and infertility are prevalent in the spina bifida (SB) population; however, the mechanism of how they affect a person with spina bifida is poorly understood. Additionally, the management of children with spina bifida becomes more difficult as they exit from pediatric institutes. OBJECTIVE: The present study sought to evaluate sexual health (using validated questionnaires) and fertility in adults with spina bifida and to correlate spinal cord level and ambulatory status with degree of sexual function. STUDY DESIGN: After institutional board review approval, 199 adult patients with SB, aged 18 and older and who were followed in one pediatric institution, were identified. Patients who were non-English speaking, cognitively and/or developmentally delayed, or unable to be contacted were excluded. Surveys regarding demographics, sexual health and infertility were mailed to the patients and administered in the clinic with the option to opt-out of the survey. Survey questions regarding sexual health were constructed using validated questionnaires: Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for females, and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) for males. Sexual dysfunction scores were correlated to the patients' spinal level and ambulatory status. RESULTS: Of the 121 eligible patients, 45 replied, with a response rate of 39%. For females, using a cut-off value of 26.5 for FSFI scoring, 25 out of 28 (89%) had sexual dysfunction. No association was seen between spinal level or ambulatory status and overall FSFI, satisfaction, or desire scores. For males, 10 out of 17 (59%) had severe erectile dysfunction (ED), and one out of 17 (6%) had no ED. No association was seen between ambulatory status and sexual function scores for the males. However, SHIM, satisfaction, and ED scores were higher in males with lower spinal lesions. People with spina bifida of both genders tended to have more severe dysfunction compared to those with sexual dysfunction of other etiologies, except with similar sexual desire scores. Regarding questions on fertility, no participant attempted to have children; thus, there was no infertility reported. DISCUSSION: Few studies have been conducted on sexual health and fertility in adults with SB. Three studies have utilized validated questionnaires and found varying degrees of sexual dysfunction in this subset of patients; however, only one study found sexual activity to be more likely in patients with more caudal levels of neurologic impairment. The present study also showed that SHIM, satisfaction, and ED scores were higher in males with lower spinal lesions. Limitations to this study primarily included the small sample size and low survey response rate. CONCLUSION: Limited information is known about adults with SB, and sexual function and fertility. While expressing sexual desire, adults with SB appear to experience high rates of sexual dysfunction. Fertility rates were inadequately assessed; this was possibly due to the high rate of sexual dysfunction. Sexual health in the SB population is an important component of the myriad of urologic care issues for these people. Due to the disparity in their care after reaching adulthood, it is prudent to follow these patients and understand their pathophysiology as they continue to mature through life.

Prepubertal presentation of varicocele does not affect outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Varicoceles in prepubertal boys are uncommon and little is known of the natural history. Historically, a large percentage of these boys have undergone surgical repair with the belief that such early presentation carried a worse prognosis, making assessment of longitudinal outcomes difficult. OBJECTIVE: While there may be concern that varicocele could represent a progressive disease and therefore prepubertal presentation would portend a worse prognosis, we hypothesized that there would be no difference between the prepubertal boys and other adolescents with varicocele. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed a database of boys at a single institution with a documented left-sided varicocele between 1995 and 2011. Inclusion criteria were one or more of the following: 1. Clinician-documented Tanner 1 status, 2. Right testis orchidometric or ultrasound calculated volume of ≤3 cc's. Patients were drawn from a prospectively maintained database of all boys presenting to the outpatient urology clinic receiving a diagnosis of varicocele. A cohort of adolescent boys was assembled by matching as closely as possible with respect to testis volume disparity and grade of varicocele. All matches were within 2% of volume difference. Volume was calculated using the length*width*height*0.71 formula. Testis size disparity was set to a threshold of ≥20% using the Lambert formula: (VolumeRight - VolumeLeft)/VolumeRight*100%. Our primary outcome was defined as hypotrophy or the need for surgery for hypotrophy at the termination of the study. We planned a single subgroup analysis of boys based on presentation with or without hypotrophy. The decision for surgery or observation was made by the individual clinician at the time of patient assessment. RESULTS: On presentation, the prepubertal cohort was younger (10.8 vs 14.1 years), and with smaller left (2.4 vs 11.6 cc) and right (2.4 vs 11.6 cc) testis volume. There were no significant differences with respect to varicocele grade and volume differentials at presentation. At the end of the study, 76% of the prepubertal cohort had neither hypotrophy nor the requirement for operation, compared with 83% of the matched cohort (P = 0.71, Fisher's exact test). Similarly, there were no significant differences in outcome when comparing prepubertal boys with initial symmetry or hypotrophy to their matched cohort of older adolescents. DISCUSSION: The prepubertal varicocele is a rare clinical problem for which little data exists to guide the clinician. In a review of Pubmed indexed English language manuscripts, we were only able to find five papers with information on Tanner stage; only 31 prepubertal boys have longitudinal data reported. This study approximately doubles the number of boys for whom such data is available in the literature. Our chief limitation was sample size. A power analysis indicated that a final-analysis cohort of 90 prepubertal boys would be required to detect a 20% difference in outcome between that group and a matched cohort of pubertal or post-pubertal boys. We propose that given the lack of evidence for worse outcomes in prepubertal boys with varicocele that prepubertal status, in and of itself, not be considered an additional indication for correction of varicocele. CONCLUSION: In our retrospective cohort of prepubertal boys with left testis varicocele and their matched cohort, we did not detect a difference in the rate of good outcomes, defined as the absence of hypotrophy and lack of need for surgical intervention. While we may have suspected, as have others, that prepubertal presentation would have conveyed a more pressing need to intervene, it is likely that these boys represent the very same patients that we see more commonly later in their adolescence, and should thus be managed in a similarly conservative fashion.