Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Knee ; 22(4): 304-8, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25999126

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent biomechanical research has suggested that adjustable-loop graft suspension constructs in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may loosen after deployment. Our objective was to compare short-term knee stability and graft failure rate between adjustable-loop and fixed-loop femoral cortical suspension in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. METHODS: A consecutive series of 188 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction using hamstrings autograft by a single surgeon were divided into two groups; 73 received adjustable-loop (TightRope RT (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL)) and 115 received fixed-loop (RetroButton (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL)) femoral cortical suspension. The two groups were compared at six months, one year, and two years postoperatively using KT-1000 arthrometer testing and graft failure rate (revision surgery, grade 2+ Lachman test, any pivot shift, >5mm side-to-side KT-1000 difference). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in maximum side-to-side difference in KT-1000 testing at six months (mean 1.51mm (adjustable-loop group) vs. 1.79mm (fixed-loop group), p=0.23), one year (mean 1.44mm vs. 1.64mm, p=0.48), or two years (mean 1.14mm vs. 1.07mm, p=0.90) postoperatively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in rate of graft failure (10% vs. 11%, p=0.71) or timing of graft failure in affected patients (mean 11.4months vs. 13.8months, p=0.51). CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference in postoperative knee stability or graft failure rate between adjustable-loop and fixed-loop femoral cortical suspension in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. Our results suggest that adjustable-loop suspension does not clinically loosen after ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (retrospective cohort study).


Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/instrumentación , Fémur/cirugía , Fijadores Internos , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentación , Adolescente , Adulto , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Artroscopía/métodos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Masculino , Ensayo de Materiales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA