Outcome and management of pathological stage I endometrial carcinoma patients with involvement of the lower uterine segment.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcome of pathologic stage I endometrial carcinoma patients with lower uterine segment (LUS) involvement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the characteristics and outcomes of pathologic stage I endometrial carcinoma patients treated with primary surgery at our institution between 1988 and 1998. The significance of LUS involvement was examined with univariate and multivariate analyses. Median patient follow-up was 37.3 months. RESULTS: Of the 98 cases reviewed, 41 (42%) had LUS involvement. No differences were seen in the clinicopathologic features, extent of surgical staging, or adjuvant therapies between patients with and without LUS involvement. Univariate analysis revealed that grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), myometrial invasion (MI), and histology were correlated with recurrence. While the 5-year actuarial disease-free survival was worse in women with LUS involvement (80.3 vs 94.0%) compared to those without, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.14). Moreover, after controlling for pathologic features in a multivariate model, LUS involvement was not correlated with patient outcome (P = 0.98; hazard rate 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.24, 4.0). LUS was also not correlated with pelvic recurrence. Of 25 low-risk patients (superficial MI and grade 1-2 disease) with LUS involvement, none recurred in the pelvis following surgery alone. In contrast, pelvic recurrence was common (5/12 or 41.6%) in high-risk patients (deep MI and/or grade 3 tumors) following surgery alone regardless of LUS involvement. CONCLUSION: LUS involvement is common in pathologic stage I endometrial carcinoma but is not correlated with a worse outcome. Moreover, in the absence of adverse pathologic features, LUS involvement is not associated with an increased risk of pelvic recurrence and should not be used as an indication for adjuvant radiation therapy.

An alpha-fetoprotein-producing hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

BACKGROUND: Hepatoid adenocarcinomas are tumors that arise outside the liver but resemble hepatic tissue and produce alpha-fetoprotein. These neoplasms have been described in many locations, including the lung, gastrointestinal tract, and urogenital tract, and have been associated with a poor prognosis. Two previously reported cases of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium described aggressive tumors that were unresponsive to multiple forms of therapy. CASE: We report a case of an alpha-fetoprotein-producing hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium that was successfully treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Eight years after therapy, the patient is alive with no evidence of disease, suggesting that cytoxan, adriamycin, and cis-platinum are active agents in this unusual entity.

Phase I trial of concomitant vinorelbine, paclitaxel, and pelvic irradiation in cervical carcinoma and other advanced pelvic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and toxicity of concomitant vinorelbine, paclitaxel, and pelvic radiation therapy (RT) in patients with advanced cervical cancer and other pelvic malignancies. METHODS: Eligible patients included those with large or locally advanced cervical cancer. In addition, patients with other advanced gynecologic malignancies were eligible. In part I, vinorelbine was administered as a single agent during pelvic RT at a starting dose of 10 mg/m(2)/week with subsequent cohorts being escalated in 5 mg/m(2)/week increments. In part II, paclitaxel was added to vinorelbine (20 mg/m(2)/week) and pelvic RT at a starting dose of 20 mg/m(2)/week. RESULTS: Thirty-three women with pelvic malignancies (22 cervix, 6 vagina, 3 endometrium, 2 vulva) were enrolled. Twenty-seven received vinorelbine and 6 received both paclitaxel and vinorelbine in combination with pelvic RT. Escalating vinorelbine doses to 25 mg/m(2)/week were well tolerated, with the primary toxicity being hematologic. RT was delayed in only 1 patient due to acute hematologic toxicity. In contrast, the combination of paclitaxel, vinorelbine, and pelvic RT was not well tolerated. Five of 6 patients (83%) experienced grade > or = 2 leukopenia, with 2 patients missing > 1 cycle of chemotherapy. Moreover, RT was delayed for 1 week in 2 of 6 patients (33%). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant pelvic RT and vinorelbine with doses to 25 mg/m(2)/week is well tolerated. The addition of paclitaxel to this combination is associated with significant hematologic toxicity and is thus not a feasible approach.

Outcome of endometrial carcinoma patients with involvement of the uterine serosa.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this work was to evaluate the outcome of endometrial carcinoma patients undergoing primary surgery who have serosal involvement (SI). METHODS: Between 1980 and 1998, 562 women underwent primary surgery for endometrial cancer at the University of Chicago. Thirty-nine were noted to have SI. FIGO stages were IIIA (19), IIIB (1), IIIC (7), and IV (12). Of the 19 IIIA patients, 15 had solitary SI. Twenty-six patients received pelvic radiation therapy (RT) with or without vaginal brachytherapy (VB). One patient received whole-abdomen radiation therapy, and 13, adjuvant chemotherapy. Solitary SI patients received pelvic RT with or without VB as their sole adjuvant therapy. Disease-free survivals (DFSs) were estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier and prognostic factors were analyzed by the log-rank test. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 30.3 months, the 5-year actuarial DFS of the entire group was 28.9%. Factors correlated with disease recurrence included tumor stage (P = 0.003) and lymph node involvement (P = 0.04). In addition, patients with solitary SI had a better 5-year DFS (41.5% vs 20%, P = 0.04) than patients with SI plus other extrauterine sites. Relapse occurred in 23 women overall and in 7 of 15 solitary SI patients. The most common site of disease recurrence was distant both in the entire group and in the solitary SI patients. While abdominal recurrences were common in the entire group, they were infrequent in solitary SI patients. CONCLUSION: Endometrial carcinoma patients with SI have a high rate of relapse and a poor outcome. Even when patients have extrauterine disease limited to SI, the outcome is relatively unfavorable. Nonetheless, our results demonstrate the need to distinguish patients with solitary SI and those with SI plus other extrauterine disease sites.

Initial clinical experience with intensity-modulated whole-pelvis radiation therapy in women with gynecologic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: Our goal in this article to describe our initial experience with intensity-modulated whole-pelvis radiation therapy (IM-WPRT) in gynecologic malignancies. METHODS: Between February and August 2000, 15 women with cervical (9) or endometrial (6) cancer received IM-WPRT. All patients received a treatment planning computed tomography (CT) scan. On each scan, the target volume (upper vagina, parametrial tissues, presacral region, uterus, and regional lymph nodes) and normal tissues (small bowel, bladder, and rectum) were identified. Using commercially available software, an IM-WPRT plan was generated for each patient. The goal was to provide coverage of the target with the prescription dose (45 Gy) while minimizing the volume of small bowel, bladder, and rectum irradiated. Acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxic effects in these women were compared with those seen in 25 patients treated with conventional WPRT. RESULTS: IM-WPRT plans provided excellent coverage of the target structures in all patients and were highly conformal, providing considerable sparing of the bladder, rectum, and small bowel. Treatment was well tolerated, with grade 0-1 GI and GU toxicity in 46 and 93% of patients, respectively. IM-WPRT patients had a lower rate of grade 2 GI toxicity (53.4% vs 96%, P = 0.001) than those treated with conventional WPRT. Moreover, the percentage of women requiring no or only infrequent antidiarrheal medications was lower in the IM-WPRT group (73.3% vs 20%, P = 0.001). While grade 2 GU toxicity was also lower in the IM-WPRT patients (6.7% vs 16%), this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.38). CONCLUSION: IM-WPRT provides excellent coverage of the target structures while sparing critical neighboring structures in gynecology patients. Treatment is well tolerated with less acute GI toxicity than conventional WPRT. More patients and longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the full merits of this approach.

Significant pelvic recurrence in high-risk pathologic stage I--IV endometrial carcinoma patients after adjuvant chemotherapy alone: implications for adjuvant radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of pelvic recurrence (PVR) in high-risk pathologic Stage I--IV endometrial carcinoma patients after adjuvant chemotherapy alone. METHODS: Between 1992 and 1998, 43 high-risk endometrial cancer patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients underwent primary surgery consisting of total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. No patients received preoperative radiation therapy (RT). Regional lymph nodes and peritoneal cytology were sampled in 62.8% and 83.7% of cases, respectively. Most patients had Stage III--IV disease (83.7%) or unfavorable histology tumors (74.4%). None had evidence of extra-abdominal disease. All patients received 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy as the sole adjuvant therapy, consisting primarily of cisplatin and doxorubicin. Recurrent disease sites were divided into pelvic (vaginal, nonvaginal) and extrapelvic (para-aortic, upper abdomen, liver, and extra-abdominal). Median follow-up was 27 months (range, 2--96 months). RESULTS: Twenty-nine women (67.4%) relapsed. Seventeen (39.5%) recurred in the pelvis and 23 (55.5%) in extrapelvic sites. The 3-year actuarial PVR rate was 46.5%. The most significant factors correlated with PVR were cervical involvement (CI) (p = 0.01) and adnexal (p = 0.05) involvement. Of the 17 women who developed a PVR, 8 relapsed in the vagina, 3 in the nonvaginal pelvis, and 6 in both. The 3-year vaginal and nonvaginal PVR rates were 37.8% and 26%, respectively. The most significant factor correlated with vaginal PVR was CI (p = 0.0007). Deep myometrial invasion (p = 0.02) and lymph nodal involvement (p = 0.03) were both correlated with nonvaginal PVR. Nine of the 29 relapsed patients (31%) developed PVR as their only (6) or first site (3) of recurrence. Factors associated with a higher rate of PVR (as the first or only site) were CI and Stage I--II disease. CONCLUSIONS: PVR is common in high-risk pathologic Stage I-IV endometrial cancer patients after adjuvant chemotherapy alone. These results support the continued use of locoregional RT in patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to test the addition of chemotherapy to locoregional RT.

Surgery and postoperative radiation therapy in FIGO Stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome, pattern(s) of failure, and optimal treatment volume in Stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma patients treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy (RT). METHODS: Between 1983 and 1998, 30 Stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma patients were treated with primary surgery and postoperative RT at the University of Chicago. All underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, sampling of pelvic lymph nodes (PLN), and peritoneal cytology. All were noted to have PLN involvement. Para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) were sampled in 26 cases, and were positive in 14 cases (54%). Twenty women received whole-pelvic RT (WPRT) and 10 (WPRT), plus paraortic RT (extended-field RT, EFRT). One EFRT patient also underwent concomitant whole-abdominal RT (WART). Adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (VB) was delivered in 10, chemotherapy in 5, and hormonal therapy in 7 patients. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 32 months, the actuarial 5-year disease-free and cause-specific survivals of the entire group were 33.9% and 55.8%, respectively. Overall, 16 women (53%) relapsed. Sites of failure included the pelvis (23%), abdomen (13%), PALN (13%), and distant (40%). Of the 7 pelvic failures, 4 were vaginal (3 vaginal only). Patients treated with VB had a trend to a lower vaginal recurrence rate (0/10 vs. 4/20, p = 0.12) than those not receiving VB. All 4 PALN failures were in women treated with WPRT (2 negative, 1 unsampled, and 1 positive PALN). None of the 10 EFRT patients (2 negative, 8 positive PALN) recurred in the PALN. No patient developed an isolated abdominal recurrence. Two patients developed significant RT sequelae: chronic diarrhea in 1 patient treated with WPRT and VB, and small bowel obstruction in 1 patient treated with EFRT. CONCLUSION: FIGO Stage IIIC disease comprises a small percentage of endometrial carcinoma patients but carries a poor prognosis. Our failure pattern suggests that the optimal adjuvant RT volume is EFRT, even in women with negative PALN sampling. VB should also be administered to improve local control. The low rate of abdominal recurrence does not support the routine use of WART in these women. Given the predominance of failure in distant sites, attention should be focused on the development of systemic chemotherapy protocols.

Absence of major peripheral neuropathy in a phase II trial of ifosfamide with vinorelbine in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum and paclitaxel.

Both ifosfamide and vinorelbine have been shown to produce responses in women with previously treated ovarian cancer. However, vinorelbine has been reported to cause severe neuropathy in patients previously treated with paclitaxel. We assessed a regimen consisting of ifosfamide 1.6 g/m2/d and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2/d for 3 days consecutively every 21 days. Because these doses resulted in severe neutropenia despite the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, doses were reduced to a final level of ifosfamide 960 mg/m2/d and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/d. Peripheral sensory neuropathy was evaluated by questionnaire. A total of 30 women were treated. All had previously been treated with both a platinum compound and paclitaxel. One partial response was observed among 23 patients with measurable disease, and two CA-125 responses were noted among seven patients without measurable disease. Severe progressive neurotoxicity was not observed. Despite the fact that almost half the patients had not been exposed to cyclophosphamide, this regimen produced few responses. Superior response rates have been reported with single-agent vinorelbine at doses that do not require growth factor support. With this dose and schedule, vinorelbine is reasonably safe therapy for patients who have received prior paclitaxel and who have have mild baseline sensory neuropathy.

Phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The combination of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin has activity in gynecologic malignancies but requires colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Moreover, there is concern about cardiotoxicity with doxorubicin/paclitaxel combinations. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin may result in less myelosuppression and cardiac toxicity than free doxorubicin. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximal tolerated dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with fixed doses of paclitaxel and cisplatin without using G-CSF support in advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled; none of the patients had received prior doxorubicin. Patients received paclitaxel (90 mg/m2 for dose level one, escalating to 135 mg/m2 for all subsequent dose levels), with a fixed dose of cisplatin (60 mg/m2), followed by escalating doses of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin every 21 days. RESULTS: A total of 73 cycles was administered. Grade 4 neutropenia was seen after cycle one in two of eight patients receiving 30 mg/m2 of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and three of seven patients receiving 40 mg/m2 of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin when combined with 135 mg/m2 of paclitaxel and 60 mg/m2 of cisplatin. Two additional patients at the 40 mg/m2 dose level developed grade 4 neutropenia following cycles 2 and 5. The mean decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after 2 cycles was 5 percentage points (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel and cisplatin is feasible without G-CSF support.

Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiation therapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to reduce the volume of small bowel irradiated in women with gynecologic malignancies receiving whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten women with cervical (5) or endometrial (5) cancer undergoing WPRT were selected for this analysis. A planning CT scan of each patient was obtained following administration of oral, i.v., and rectal contrast. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the proximal vagina, parametrial tissues, uterus (if present), and regional lymph nodes. The CTV was expanded uniformly by 1 cm in all directions to produce a planning target volume (PTV). The bladder, rectum, and small bowel were also delineated in each patient. Two plans were created: a standard "4-field box" with apertures shaped to the PTV in each beam's eye view and an IM-WPRT plan designed to conform to the PTV while minimizing the volume of normal tissues irradiated. Both plans were normalized to deliver 45 Gy to the PTV. Isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVH) were compared. RESULTS: The IM-WPRT plan reduced the volume of small bowel irradiated in all 10 patients at doses above 30 Gy. At the prescription dose, the average volume of small bowel irradiated was reduced by a factor of two (17.4 vs. 33.8%, p = 0.0005). In addition, the average volume of rectum and bladder irradiated at the prescription dose was reduced by 23% in both cases (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0005, respectively). The average PTV doses delivered by the conventional and IM-WPRT plans were 47.8 Gy and 47.4 Gy, respectively. Corresponding maximum doses were 50.0 Gy and 54.8 Gy, respectively. However, on average, only 3.2% of the PTV received greater than 50.0 Gy in the IM-WPRT plans. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that IM-WPRT is an effective means of reducing the volume of small bowel irradiated in women with gynecologic malignancies receiving WPRT. This approach potentially offers a method for reducing small bowel complications in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Characteristics and outcome of endometrial carcinoma patients age 45 years and younger.

Recent reports have suggested that the pathologic features of young patients with endometrial cancer are less favorable than previously thought. We retrospectively reviewed the characteristics and outcome of young patients with endometrial cancer at our institution. A total of 457 surgically staged patients were divided in 2 groups: Group A (age < or =45 years, n = 41) and B (age >45, n = 416). Groups A and B had a similar distribution of tumor stage, grade, histology, lymphovascular invasion, synchronous ovarian primaries, and positive cytology. Although group A tumors had less myometrial invasion (MI) (p = 0.004) and were lower grade (p = 0.06), a trend to more frequent nodal involvement was seen in group A women (p = 0.09). Adverse pathologic features, in particular deep MI, were more common in group A patients older than age 40. Group A patients had a disease-free (p = 0.56) and cause-specific (p = (0.26) survival that was similar to that of group B patients. Young patients with endometrial cancer have a distribution of most pathologic features and equivalent outcome similar to that of older women. However, adverse features are not equally distributed in young women. A discordance may also exist between MI, grade, and nodal involvement.

Synchronous ovarian and endometrial malignancies.

Synchronous ovarian primaries are infrequently found in patients with endometrial cancer. Although numerous investigators have examined the characteristics of these women, most include patients with tumors of similar histology, which may simply represent ovarian metastases. To overcome this problem, we present here patients found to have tumors of dissimilar histology. Of 499 patients with endometrial cancer undergoing primary surgery between 1980 and 1997, 18 (3.6%) were found to have endometrial and ovarian primaries of dissimilar histology. The median age was 64.2 years. Most had stage I, grades I and II, minimally invasive endometrial adenocarcinomas and stage IA mucinous or serous ovarian cystadenocarcinomas. Most ovarian tumors were either borderline or grades I and II. The 5-year actuarial disease-free (DFS) and cause-specific survivals of the entire group were 81.2% and 89.5%, respectively. Those with both stage I ovarian and endometrial primaries had a trend to a better DFS (100 versus 68.6%, p = 0.07) than did women with higher stage disease. Our data demonstrate that synchronous ovarian primaries of dissimilar histology are infrequently found in women undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer. These women seek treatment at a relatively advanced age, and have early-stage, low grade disease in both sites. Their outcome is favorable, particularly those with stage I disease in both sites.

Age as a prognostic factor for recurrence in patients with endometrial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate age as a prognostic factor for recurrence in endometrial cancer patients treated with primary surgery. METHODS: Between 1983 and 1998, 455 endometrial cancer patients underwent primary surgery at our institution. Patients were divided into three age groups based on age at diagnosis: Group A (age <60, n = 156), B (age 60-69, n = 147), and C (age >/=70, n = 152). Clinicopathologic, treatment factors, and outcome were compared among the three groups. Prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The three age groups had a similar distribution of most pathologic features including stage, histology, cervical involvement, positive cytology, adnexal involvement, nodal metastases, serosal involvement, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Older women had a higher rate, however, of deep (>1/2) myometrial invasion (P < 0.0001) and grade 3 tumors (P < 0.0001). The extent of surgical staging and use of adjuvant radiation therapy were similar. Five-year disease-free survivals (DFS) of Groups A, B, and C were 74.3, 70.2, and 60.3%, respectively (P = 0.08). A significant difference in DFS was seen when Groups A and B were combined and compared with Group C (72.0 vs 60.3%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis confirmed the significance of race, stage, grade, and LVI. Age was not found to be associated with recurrence (HR 1.1, 95% C.I. 0.91-1.5, P = 0.21). CONCLUSION: Our results reveal that, in a large cohort of comparably staged and treated endometrial carcinoma patients, age is not a prognostic factor for recurrence.

One versus two intracavitary brachytherapy applications in early-stage cervical cancer patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of early stage cervical cancer patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy (RT) with one versus two low-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (ICB) applications. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1983 and 1993, 140 stage IB-IIA patients underwent whole-pelvis RT (WPRT) and ICB. Prior to 1988, 56 patients (40%) received two ICB applications. After 1988, our policy was modified and subsequently 84 (60%) patients underwent one application. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, outcome, and complications of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The groups were balanced in terms of race, hemoglobin level, histology, grade, treatment duration, chemotherapy, and follow-up. The single-application group, however, had more stage IB disease, had small (< or =4 cm) tumors, and received higher WPRT and lower point A doses. Overall, the two groups had similar 5-year local control (P = 0.83) and disease-free (P = 0.23) and cause-specific (P = 0.29) survival rates. Moreover, no differences were seen when analyzed by tumor size or stage. On multivariate analysis, the number of applications was not correlated with recurrence (P = 0.59, hazard rate = 1.1, 95% confidence interval = 0.6-2.2). Chronic complications were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our nonselected comparison of one versus two ICB applications in early-stage cervical cancer patients reveals comparable outcomes and complication rates for the two approaches. These results support the use of a single application in early-stage patients undergoing definitive RT.

Acute problems during low-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and severity of problems arising during the hospitalization of cervical carcinoma patients undergoing low-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (ICB). METHODS: One hundred seventy ICB implants in 128 cervical carcinoma patients undergoing curative radiation therapy were reviewed. All events during the hospitalization requiring physician evaluation and/or intervention were scored as a "problem" and divided into 10 categories (fever/infection, pain, gastrointestinal, renal, pulmonary, cardiac, dermatologic, gynecologic, endocrinologic, psychiatric). Problems were scored as mild (no significant morbidity, therapy not discontinued), moderate (therapy discontinued but no significant morbidity), or severe (significant morbidity or mortality). Patient and treatment factors were correlated with acute problems. RESULTS: Forty-two implants (24.7%) were associated with acute problems (95% minor, 5% moderate, 0% severe). The most common types were fever/infection (14.1%) and gastrointestinal problems (5. 9%). Other problem types occurred in <3% of implants. No patient or treatment factor including age, comorbid disease, weight, implant duration, or anesthesia type was significantly correlated with acute problems. Patients who developed acute problems had a survival (P = 0.21) and risk of late sequelae (P = 0.74) similar to those of patients without acute problems. CONCLUSION: Problems occur during the hospitalization in approximately one-quarter of cervical carcinoma patients undergoing low-dose-rate ICB. However, most are minor and do not result in morbidity, require discontinuation of therapy, or adversely impact on outcome.

Race and clinical outcome in endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of black and white women who have surgically staged endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the clinicopathologic factors, socioeconomic status, treatments, and outcomes of 70 black and 302 white women who were treated for surgically staged endometrial carcinoma at our institution. RESULTS: Black women had higher-grade tumors, less favorable histologic findings, more comorbid illnesses, and lower socioeconomic indices. A nonsignificant trend was also seen toward more advanced-stage disease. The extent of surgical staging and types of adjuvant therapies were similar. On univariate analysis, black women had worse 5-year disease-free survival than white women (52.8% versus 75.2%; P = .001). Other significant factors included stage, grade, lymph node status, extension to the uterine serosa, cervical involvement, histology, adnexal involvement, lymphovascular invasion, myometrial invasion, positive peritoneal cytology, level of education, and household income. After controlling for pathologic and socioeconomic differences in multivariate analysis, race remained a significant prognostic factor (P = .008; hazard rate 2.0; 95% confidence interval 1.2, 3.5). CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of surgically staged and uniformly treated patients with endometrial carcinoma, black race was associated with significantly worse outcomes, even after controlling for clinicopathologic and socioeconomic factors.

Surgery and postoperative radiation therapy in stage II endometrial carcinoma.

The traditional approach to patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma is preoperative radiation therapy (RT) followed by surgery. Currently, many patients are treated with primary surgery and postoperative RT. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 44 stage II (32 IIA, 12 IIB) patients who underwent surgery and postoperative RT. Nine (20%) had microscopic cervical involvement noted before surgery, and 35 (80%) had occult involvement noted postoperatively. Postoperative RT consisted of whole pelvic RT (WPRT) (50%), vaginal brachytherapy (VB) (18%), or both (32%). At a median follow-up of 40 months, the 5-year actuarial disease-free survival was 72.4%. Two patients (4%) had recurrence in the pelvis (one vagina, one lateral pelvis). Eighteen stage IIA patients treated with WPRT alone and eight stage IIA patients, without deep myometrial invasion (MI), were treated with VB alone, and remained controlled in the pelvis. Extrapelvic recurrences occurred in 12 patients (25%), primarily in those with deep MI and/or grade 2-3 disease. Our results suggest that patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma with microscopic or occult cervical involvement treated with surgery and postoperative RT have a favorable outcome. A high rate of pelvic control is achieved with RT tailored to the pathologic findings.

The significance of adnexal involvement in endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic significance of and predictive factors for adnexal involvement (AI) in patients with endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the pathological features and outcomes of endometrial carcinoma patients. The prognostic significance of AI was examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Median follow-up was 30.7 months. RESULTS: Of the 382 cases reviewed, 40 (10.5%) had AI. Patients with AI had a worse 5-year disease-free (DFS) survival (73.1 vs 37.1%, P < 0.0001) than patients without AI. However, patients with AI had multiple adverse features, including high grade disease, lymphovascular invasion, and additional sites of extrauterine disease. After controlling for these factors on multivariate analysis, AI lost its prognostic significance (P = 0.56). The 12 AI patients without other extrauterine disease had a favorable outcome (5-year DFS of 70.9%). Factors predictive of AI on logistic regression were metastatic disease, positive peritoneal washings, cervical involvement, and unfavorable histology. CONCLUSION: Endometrial carcinoma patients with AI have relatively poor prognoses. However, AI per se has little, if any, independent prognostic significance. The poor outcomes seen in these patients appear to result from the preponderance of other adverse pathologic factors.

External pelvic radiation therapy in stage IC endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes of patients with stage IC endometrial carcinoma treated with external whole pelvic radiation but not vaginal brachytherapy. METHODS: Sixty-one women with stage IC endometrial carcinoma had postoperative pelvic radiation without vaginal brachytherapy. The median age was 69 years (range 44-87 years). Most subjects had histologic findings of adenocarcinoma (71%) and grade 2 or 3 disease (74%). The median pelvic irradiation dose was 48.6 Gy (range 43.2-50.4 Gy). No patients received adjuvant chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. The median follow-up time was 69.5 months (range 7-196 months). RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial disease-free and overall survivals of the entire group were 86.7% and 97.6%, respectively. No patient developed local (vaginal) recurrence. One patient had recurrent disease in the lateral pelvis. Ten patients (16.4%) had distant (extrapelvic) metastases. No serious sequelae were noted, including vaginal necrosis, small bowel obstruction, proctitis, or fistulae. CONCLUSION: Local control was excellent in stage IC endometrial carcinoma treated with adjuvant radiation therapy alone. Attention needs to be focused on efforts to control extrapelvic recurrence in patients with this disease.