Hyperkalemia Recurrence Following Medical Nutrition Therapy in Patients with Stage 3-4 Chronic Kidney Disease: The REVOLUTIONIZE I Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: The REVOLUTIONIZE I study aimed to characterize the relationships between medical nutrition therapy (MNT) and hyperkalemia recurrence in patients with stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hyperkalemia who received MNT in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This observational cohort study used de-identified electronic health record data from patients aged ≥ 18 years with stage 3-4 CKD who received MNT between January 2019 and October 2022 and had hyperkalemia (serum potassium > 5.0 mmol/L) within 30 days before MNT. Patients were followed for 6 months or until the first censoring event (death, prescription of outpatient potassium binder, or study end). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with ≥ 1 hyperkalemia recurrence during follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the number of hyperkalemia recurrences per patient, time to each recurrence, and hyperkalemia-related healthcare resource utilization. Exploratory outcomes included all-cause healthcare resource utilization and mortality. RESULTS: The final cohort comprised 2048 patients; 1503 (73.4%) patients remained uncensored after 6 months. During the 6-month follow-up period, 56.0% of patients had ≥ 1 hyperkalemia recurrence and 37.4% had ≥ 1 recurrence within the first month. Patients with ≥ 1 hyperkalemia recurrence during follow-up had a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 2.6 ± 2.2 recurrences. The mean ± SD time to first hyperkalemia recurrence was 45 ± 46 days; the time between recurrences decreased with subsequent episodes. Hyperkalemia-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits were recorded for 13.7% and 1.5% of patients, respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed that results were consistent across patient subgroups, including those with comorbid heart failure and patients receiving renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor therapy at baseline. CONCLUSION: Most patients with stage 3-4 CKD had hyperkalemia recurrence, and MNT alone was inadequate to prevent recurrence. These patients may require additional long-term treatment, such as novel potassium binders, to maintain normokalemia and prevent hyperkalemia recurrence following MNT. Infographic available for this article. INFOGRAPHIC.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) typically receive dietary counseling from a registered dietician, referred to as medical nutrition therapy, to help reduce their risk of complications of CKD while addressing their specific nutritional needs. Patients with CKD have an increased risk of elevated blood potassium levels (hyperkalemia), which has potentially life-threatening consequences. Although medical nutrition therapy may help patients with hyperkalemia to manage their dietary potassium intake, its effects in preventing recurrence are unclear. Our aim was to determine whether medical nutrition therapy can help prevent hyperkalemia recurrence after an initial event in patients with non-dialysis-dependent (stage 3­4) CKD in real-world clinical practice. We used data from de-identified electronic health records to study hyperkalemia recurrence over 6 months in patients with stage 3­4 CKD who received medical nutrition therapy within 30 days after experiencing hyperkalemia. Over half of the patients (56.0%) had at least one hyperkalemia recurrence within an average of 45 days during the 6 months after medical nutrition therapy; these patients had an average of 2.6 distinct recurrences in 6 months. In patients with two or more hyperkalemia recurrences, the time between these became shorter than 30 days. Our real-world study results show that hyperkalemia is a chronic, recurring condition in patients with stage 3­4 CKD, and that medical nutrition therapy is not enough to prevent its recurrence. This suggests that these patients may need additional long-term treatment for hyperkalemia, such as novel potassium binder therapy, to prevent hyperkalemia recurrence.

Healthcare utilization and expenditures associated with hyperkalemia management: a retrospective study of Medicare Advantage patients.

AIMS: This study aimed to estimate the association of patiromer exposure vs. no potassium (K+) binder (NoKb) exposure with healthcare utilization and expenditures among a cohort of Medicare Advantage patients with hyperkalemia (HK). METHODS: Using Optum's Clinformatics Data Mart (study period 2016-2019), the authors assessed propensity score-matched patients (1:1) with a serum K+ concentration ≥5.0 mmol/L and an HK diagnosis that were exposed to patiromer or NoKb on baseline characteristics. The following outcomes were compared: (1) inpatient/emergency department (ED) encounters, (2) inpatient costs greater than or equal to mean Medicare Advantage inpatient cost (i.e. $14,900), and (3) the relative healthcare spending rate. Logistic regression and zero-inflated negative binomial regression were used to analyze the outcomes. RESULTS: The study cohort included 1,539 patiromer and NoKb matched pairs. Baseline characteristics were (patiromer/NoKb): age 74/75 years; female 42/40%; serum K+ 5.6/5.6 mmol/L; eGFR rate 36/36 mL/min/1.73 m2; low-income subsidy 42/41%, chronic kidney disease 96/96%; end-stage renal disease 12/12%; and congestive heart failure 37/36%. A total of 253 matched pairs (506 patients) remained uncensored and were analyzed at 6 months. Inpatient/ED encounters were observed for 25% (patiromer) and 37% (NoKb) (odds ratio [OR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-0.89). The relative odds of having inpatient costs ≥$14,900 were ∼50% less for patients exposed to patiromer vs. NoKb (OR [95% CI]: 0.47 [0.25-0.89]). The relative total healthcare spending rate (including inpatient, outpatient, ED, and pharmacy costs) was 19% less for patients exposed to patiromer vs. NoKb (spending rate ratio [95% CI]: 0.81 [0.67-0.98]). CONCLUSION AND LIMITATIONS: Among Medicare Advantage patients with HK, patiromer exposure (vs. NoKb) was associated with statistically significant reductions in the proportion with inpatient/ED encounters, inpatient costs ≥$14,900, and lower total healthcare spending. Further research, with larger sample size, is warranted to fully validate these findings.

Real-World Assessment of Health Care Costs for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Following Initiation of First-Line Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Management of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDA) places a significant financial burden on the U.S. health care system because of such factors as treatment with multidrug chemotherapy regimens, management of chemotherapy-related adverse events, and disease- or treatment-related hospitalizations. Depending on functional status, first-line chemotherapy regimens that are guideline recommended include nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine (AG) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX), the combination of fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. However, few previous studies have examined overall health care costs associated with mPDA management. OBJECTIVE: To describe health care costs following initiation of first-line treatment with AG or FFX among patients with mPDA. METHODS: Retrospective cohorts of first-line AG and FFX initiators were constructed from the MarketScan database (2014-2017). The index date was the date of first-line AG or FFX initiation. Included patients had insurance enrollment for 6 months before the index date. Total cumulative health care costs and costs from outpatient services, inpatient admissions, emergency department visits, chemotherapy administrations, and pharmacy dispensing were assessed within 12 months after the index date (i.e., 0-1, 0-2, …, 0-12 months). Patient-level cost data began accruing from the first paid claim and continued accruing until the censoring date. RESULTS: A total of 2,199 patients with mPDA initiated first-line AG (n = 1,352) or FFX (n = 847). Compared with AG initiators, FFX patients were younger (mean age 59 vs. 63 years) and had better baseline health status, with fewer having diabetes (43% vs. 57%) or coronary artery disease (12% vs. 22%). Median follow-up was 5.4 and 7.2 months for AG and FFX, respectively. Median first-line treatment duration was 2.1 months with AG and 2.3 months with FFX. Six months following first-line treatment initiation, total cumulative health care costs (median) were $85,714 (95% CI = $79,683-$91,788) and $114,116 (95% CI = $105,816-$119,591) for AG and FFX initiators, respectively. Outpatient services contributed the largest fractional cost for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Total health care costs for patients with mPDA who initiated FFX or AG are driven mostly by outpatient rather than inpatient costs. Further research, using comparative methodology, is warranted to fully understand cost drivers and whether higher costs for FFX patients relate primarily to use of FFX or higher underlying use of outpatient care among FFX patients. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Halozyme Therapeutics. Oestreicher and Yeganegi were employees of Halozyme Therapeutics at the time of the study and were involved in study design, data interpretation, and the decision to submit the data for publication. Bullock reports advisory board fees from Eisai, Exelixis, Bayer, and Taiho and consulting fees from Halozyme Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. Rowan reports consulting fees from Halozyme Therapeutics, during the conduct of the study. Chiorean reports grants and consulting fees from Celgene and Halozyme Therapeutics; grants from Lilly, Stemline, Ignyta, Roche, Merck, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Incyte, Macrogenics, Rafael, and AADi; and consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, Array, Eisai, Ipsen, Five Prime Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Vicus, and Legend, outside the submitted work.

Real-world management of hyperkalemia with patiromer among United States Veterans.

Objective: Patiromer is a sodium-free, non-absorbed, potassium (K+) binder approved for the treatment of hyperkalemia (HK). Among US Veterans with HK, this retrospective, observational cohort study evaluated patiromer utilization, RAASi continuation, and K+ concentration change following patiromer initiation.Methods: Using data from the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse, Veterans with HK (K+ ≥5.1 mmol/L) were included upon patiromer initiation (index date) during the study period (1/2016-8/2018). All patients had heart failure (HF), diabetes, or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with end-stage renal disease were excluded. The following outcomes were assessed within 6-months post-patiromer initiation: patiromer utilization (using proportion of days covered); K+ concentration change (pre- vs post-initiation); and RAASi continuation.Results: 288 Veterans with HK were included. Baseline characteristics were: median age 70 years, African-American race 24%, diabetes 83%, HF 32%, CKD 95%, and median K+ concentration 5.7 mmol/L. At 1, 3, and 6 months post-index, the median patiromer PDC was 100%, 66%, and 44%, respectively. K+ concentration reductions post-patiromer initiation were, on average, - 1.0 mmol/L (P < 0.001). At 3-6 months, 71% of patiromer initiators had K+ <5.1 mmol/L and 95% had K+ <5.5 mmol/L. RAASi therapy was continued in >80%-90% of patiromer-treated patients.Conclusions: The real-world utilization results suggest patiromer is used for the chronic management of HK. Clinically relevant K+ concentration reductions were observed at all study time points. The successful management of HK may have contributed to the observed high rate of RAASi therapy continuation. Further research is warranted to corroborate and extend these findings.

Hyperkalemia treatment modalities: A descriptive observational study focused on medication and healthcare resource utilization.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy has been shown to improve outcomes among patients with congestive heart failure, diabetes, or renal dysfunction. These patients are also at risk for the development of hyperkalemia (HK), often leading to down-titration and/or discontinuation of RAASi therapy. Patiromer is the first sodium-free, non-absorbed potassium (K+) binder approved for the treatment of hyperkalemia (HK) in over 50 years. We described the association between use of K+ binders (Patiromer and sodium polystyrene sulfonate [SPS]) and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi), on healthcare resource utilization (HRU). The study population consisted of Medicare Advantage patients with HK (K+ ≥ 5.0 mmol/L) in Optum's Clinformatics® Data Mart between 1/1/2016-12/31/2017. Patiromer and (SPS) initiators, and HK patients not exposed to a K+ binder (NoKb) were included. The index date was the date of the first K+ binder dispensing or HK diagnosis. Outcomes assessed at 6 months post-index were: (1) K+ binder utilization, (2) RAASi continuation, and (3) HRU (pre- vs post-index). HRU change was analyzed using McNemar's statistical test. Study cohorts included 610 (patiromer), 5556 (SPS), and 21,282 (NoKb) patients. Overall baseline patient characteristics were: mean age 75 years; female 49%, low-income subsidy 29%, chronic kidney disease 48% (63% for patiromer cohort), and congestive heart failure 29%. At 6 months post-index, 28% (patiromer) and 2% (SPS) remained continuously exposed to the index K+ binder. RAASi continued for 78% (patiromer), 57% (SPS), and 57% (NoKb). The difference (pre- vs post-index) in hospitalized patients was: -9.4% (patiromer; P<0.05), -7.2% (SPS), and +16.8% (NoKb; P<0.001). Disparate K+ binder utilization patterns were observed. The majority of patiromer patients continued RAASi therapy while the percentage of SPS patients that continued RAASi therapy was lower, overlapping CIs were observed. Following continuous patiromer exposure, statistically significant reductions in hospital admissions and emergency department visits were observed, continuous SPS exposure observed no statistically significant reductions in either hospitalizations or ED visits, while NoKb patients with continuous exposure had statistically significant increases in both. Further research, with a larger sample size using comparative analytic methods, is warranted.

Real-World Evaluation of Patiromer for the Treatment of Hyperkalemia in Hemodialysis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Patiromer is a potassium (K+) binding polymer indicated for treating hyperkalemia. Among patients receiving chronic hemodialysis (HD), this study aimed to identify patient characteristics associated with patiromer initiation, describe patiromer utilization, and analyze serum K+ pre- and post-patiromer initiation. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, using electronic health record data from a large dialysis provider in the United States (study period: December 21, 2015, to December 20, 2016), HD patients were included who had a medication order for patiromer, sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS), or laboratory evidence of hyperkalemia (no K+ binder [NoKb] cohort). The index date was the first order for patiromer/SPS, or the first K+ ≥5.0 mEq/l (NoKb cohort), respectively. Using multivariable logistic regression, we identified patient characteristics associated with patiromer initiation. We evaluated patiromer utilization using Kaplan-Meier methodology and proportion of days covered. Serum K+ concentrations were assessed pre- versus post-patiromer initiation. RESULTS: Study cohorts included 527 (patiromer), 852 (SPS), and 8747 (NoKb) HD patients. Median follow-up was 141 days. Patiromer initiators were 2.6 times more likely to have had multiple prior episodes of hyperkalemia (odds ratio [OR]: 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-3.7). Most (61%) commenced patiromer on 8.4 g once daily; 60% of patients' first patiromer order remained open after 180 days. Statistically significant reductions in K+, averaging approximately -0.5 mEq/l, were observed post-patiromer initiation (48% pre-patiromer vs. 22% post-patiromer had K+ ≥6.0 mEq/l [P < 0.001]). CONCLUSION: Patiromer initiators receiving chronic hemodialysis had comparatively more severe, uncontrolled baseline hyperkalemia. Medication order data show long-term patiromer use was associated with significantly reduced K+.

Effect of Single-Session, Cryogen-Cooled Monopolar Radiofrequency Therapy on Sexual Function in Women with Vaginal Laxity: The VIVEVE I Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This subanalysis of the VIVEVE I trial aimed to evaluate the impact of cryogen-cooled monopolar radiofrequency (CMRF) therapy, for the treatment of vaginal laxity, on the domains of sexual function included in the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The VIVEVE I clinical trial was prospective, randomized, single-blind, and Sham-controlled. Nine clinical study centers in Canada, Italy, Spain, and Japan were included. This subanalysis included premenopausal women with self-reported vaginal laxity who had ≥1 term vaginal delivery and a baseline FSFI total score ≤26.5, indicating sexual dysfunction. Enrolled subjects were randomized (2:1) to receive CMRF therapy [Active (90 J/cm2) vs. Sham (≤1 J/cm2)] delivered to the vaginal tissue. Independent analyses were conducted for each FSFI domain to evaluate both the mean change, as well as the clinically important change for Active- versus Sham-treated subjects at 6 months post-intervention. RESULTS: Subjects randomized to Active treatment (n = 73) had greater improvement than Sham subjects (n = 35) on all FSFI domains of sexual function at 6 months postintervention. The analysis of covariance change from baseline analyses showed statistically significant improvements, in favor of Active treatment, for sexual arousal (p = 0.004), lubrication (p = 0.04), and orgasm (p = 0.007). In addition, Active treatment was associated with clinically important and statistically significant improvements in sexual desire [Odds ratio (OR) = 3.01 (1.11-8.17)], arousal [OR = 2.73 (1.06-7.04)], and orgasm [OR = 2.58 (1.08-6.18)]. CONCLUSIONS: This subanalysis showed CMRF therapy is associated with statistically significant and clinically important improvements in sexual function in women with vaginal laxity. These findings provide the first randomized, placebo-controlled energy-based device evidence for functional improvements associated with a nonsurgical modality for a highly prevalent and undertreated condition.

Agreement and validity of electronic health record prescribing data relative to pharmacy claims data: A validation study from a US electronic health record database.

BACKGROUND: Granular clinical and laboratory data available in electronic health record (EHR) databases provide researchers the opportunity to conduct investigations that would not be possible in insurance claims databases; however, for pharmacoepidemiology studies, accurate classification of medication exposure is critical. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of classifying medication exposure using EHR prescribing (EHR-Rx) data. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients with linked claims and EHR data in OptumLabs™ Data Warehouse. The agreement between EHR-Rx data and pharmacy claims (PC-Rx) data (for 40 medications) was determined using the positive predictive value (PPV) and medication possession ratio (MPR)-calculated in 1- and 12-month medication exposure periods (MEPs). Secondary analyses were restricted to incident vs prevalent EHR-Rxs, age ≥65 vs <65, white vs black race, males vs females, and number of EHR-Rxs. RESULTS: The validity metrics varied substantially among the 40 medications assessed. Across all medications, the period PPV and MPR were 62% and 63% in the 1-month MEP. They were 78% and 43% in the 12-month MEP. Overall, PPV and MPR were higher for patients with a prevalent EHR-Rx and age <65. CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantial variability among different medications, there was very good agreement between EHR-Rx data and PC-Rx data. To maximize the validity of classifying medication exposure with EHR prescribing data, researchers may consider using longer MEPs (eg, 12 months) and potentially require multiple EHR-Rxs to classify baseline medication exposure.

Comparative adherence to diabetes drugs: An analysis of electronic health records and claims data.

Non-adherence to medications is a major challenge in diabetes care. The objective of this brief report is to compare adherence rates for 6 major classes of diabetes medications: metformin, sulfonylurea, thiazolidinedione, basal insulin, DPP-4 inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor agonists. We used a data source that linked electronic prescriptions with insurance claims to assess whether new electronic prescriptions for diabetes medications were followed by dispensing claims consistent with that prescription. After one year of follow-up, the daily medication possession probability (MPP) - a measure of overall adherence - at one year for sulfonylurea was 0.49 and for metformin was 0.46. Thiazolidinediones and basal insulin had a similar final daily MPP at 0.36 and 0.39, respectively, which was significantly lower than that for sulfonylurea or metformin (P < .05). GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors were also comparable to one another at a final daily MPP of .30 and .21, respectively (P < .05 compared to any of the aforementioned drug classes). In summary, the rates at which diabetes drugs are prescribed, and the rates at which patients actually take them, differ substantially. Physicians should be aware of potentially significant challenges concerning adherence to newer agents.

Effect of Single-Treatment, Surface-Cooled Radiofrequency Therapy on Vaginal Laxity and Female Sexual Function: The VIVEVE I Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal laxity is a highly prevalent and undertreated medical condition. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of surface-cooled, monopolar radiofrequency (RFc) therapy for the treatment of vaginal laxity in the VIVEVE I trial. METHODS: The VIVEVE I trial was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, and sham-controlled study. Nine study centers in Canada, Italy, Spain, and Japan participated. Women presenting with vaginal laxity were screened and informed consent was obtained. Major study inclusion criteria were premenopausal status, age at least 18 years, at least one full-term vaginal delivery, and normal genito-pelvic examination results. Enrolled subjects were randomized (2:1) to receive RFc therapy (Active [90 J/cm2] vs Sham [1 J/cm2], respectively) delivered to the vaginal tissue. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of randomized subjects reporting "no vaginal laxity" (Active vs Sham) at 6 months postintervention, which was assessed using the Vaginal Laxity Questionnaire. Treatment-emergent adverse events were evaluated in all treated subjects. Secondary efficacy end points included change on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the revised Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS-R). RESULTS: No vaginal laxity was achieved by 43.5% and 19.6% (P = .002) in the Active and Sham groups, respectively. Differences in FSFI and FSDS-R total scores (Active vs Sham) were 1.8 (P = .031) and -2.42 (P = .056), respectively, in favor of Active treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 11.1% and 12.3% of subjects in the Active and Sham arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: The VIVEVE I trial is the first randomized, controlled, blinded, clinical study of RFc for the treatment of vaginal laxity. A single treatment of RFc therapy was found to be safe and associated with both improved vaginal laxity and improved sexual function. The results from this trial support the use of a novel non-surgical therapy for vaginal laxity, a prevalent and undertreated condition.

Stage 2 hypertension: predictors of failure to achieve blood pressure control and the impact of adding one additional antihypertensive class.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Controlling blood pressure (BP) for patients with stage 2 hypertension remains challenging. This research aimed to: (i) identify predictors of failure to achieve BP control, (ii) determine the association of adding one additional antihypertensive class with achieving BP control, and (iii) describe the prescribed antihypertensive regimens. METHODS: Electronic medical record data from 25 multi-specialty medical groups in the USA were used. The study cohort included patients with stage 2 hypertension in 2012. BP control rates were determined at 6 months from the date of the stage 2 BP. Using multivariable logistic regression and validation by Monte Carlo simulation, we determined independent baseline predictors of not achieving BP control (<140/90). RESULTS: Included were 107 903 patients. Baseline predictors of failure to achieve BP control included the following: a prior stage 2 BP, systolic BP ≥ 165, Black race, male sex, income ≤ $35 000, body mass index ≥ 30, age ≥ 65 years, and no office visits. Increasing from single-class to dual-class antihypertensive therapy was associated with a 42% increased odds of achieving BP control (odds ratio 1.42; 95% CI 1.22, 1.64); however, this effect was attenuated as the number of baseline antihypertensive classes increased. The 10 most frequently prescribed regimens accounted for only 40% of all antihypertensive regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stage 2 hypertension, a prior stage 2 BP, a systolic BP ≥ 165, and fewer office visits were strong predictors of failure to achieve BP control. Increasing to dual-class antihypertensive therapy was significantly associated with achieving BP control. There is broad heterogeneity in the antihypertensive regimens prescribed.

No association between TNF inhibitor and methotrexate therapy versus methotrexate in changes in hemoglobin A1C and fasting glucose among psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis patients.

BACKGROUND: The use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) has been associated with a reduced incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in hemoglobin A1C and fasting glucose for patients exposed to TNFi. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with at least 3 recorded diagnosis codes for psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis between January 1, 2004 and July 31, 2011. Patients were Kaiser Permanente Southern California members for at least 1 year prior to the index date. RESULTS: For hemoglobin A1C, there were 344 patients in the MTX cohort, and 118 patients in the TNFi+MTX cohort. In the covariate adjusted main effects ANCOVA model, the TNFi+MTX cohort had a lower mean change in hemoglobin A1C of -0.18 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.35, -0.01) compared to the MTX cohort, although the difference is small and this model was not complete as there were significant interactions. For fasting glucose, there were 524 patients in the MTX cohort, and 121 patients in the TNFi+MTX cohort. In the covariate adjusted main effects ANCOVA model, change in fasting glucose was not significantly different between groups: -0.58 mg/dL (95% CI: -5.05, 3.88) for the TNFi+MTX cohort compared to the MTX cohort, although this model was not complete as there was a significant interaction. CONCLUSIONS: The use of TNF inhibitors with MTX was not associated with a significant difference in the change of hemoglobin A1C or fasting glucose compared to MTX alone.

Antihypertensive treatment and blood pressure control relative to hypertension treatment guidelines.

PURPOSE: To describe initial antihypertensive management relative to important aspects of JNC7 hypertension guidelines, to identify predictors of receiving JNC7 discordant therapy, and to determine the association between receiving JNC7-concordant antihypertensive treatment and achieving blood pressure (BP) control. This study focused on aspects of the JNC7 guidelines which are consistent with other guidelines that have been published since JNC7. METHODS: EMR data from eleven multi-specialty medical groups in the US were retrospectively collected between 2008-2011. The study cohort included incident hypertensive patients who received an antihypertensive prescription during the 6-month follow-up period. Patients with existing hypertension were excluded. JNC7-concordance of the prescribed antihypertensive regimen was evaluated. Using multivariable logistic regression, we determined the association between JNC7-concordance and achieving BP control. Additionally, we determined predictors of receiving JNC7-discordant treatment. RESULTS: 14,910 incident hypertensive patients who were treated with an antihypertensive during the 6-month follow-up period were included. Overall, 79.4% patients were prescribed antihypertensive therapy concordant with JNC7; however among patients with stage 2 hypertension, the concordance was found to be 50%. BP control was achieved by 64.1% and 48.5% of patients who received JNC7-concordant and JNC7-discordant therapy, respectively. The overall adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) for BP control and JNC7-concordance was 1.53 (1.40, 1.68). The association was attenuated for cohort members with diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and stage 2 hypertension. Predictors of receiving JNC7-discordant therapy were congestive heart failure, CKD, and diabetes. CONCLUSION: JNC7-concordance is high overall, but drops substantially when JNC7 recommendations are more demanding (e.g., among patients with stage 2 hypertension and/or CKD, CHF, diabetes). Overall, patients who are prescribed an antihypertensive regimen that is JNC7-concordant are more likely to achieve BP control.

Clinical importance of the drug interaction between statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study in The Health Improvement Network.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative hazard of muscle toxicity, renal dysfunction, and hepatic dysfunction associated with the drug interaction between statins and concomitant medications that inhibit the CYP3A4 isoenzyme. BACKGROUND: Although statins provide important clinical benefits related to mitigating the risk of cardiovascular events, this class of medications also has the potential for severe adverse reactions. The risk for adverse events may be potentiated by concomitant use of medications that interfere with statin metabolism. METHODS: Data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) from 1990 to 2008 were used to conduct a retrospective cohort study. Cohorts were created to evaluate each outcome (muscle toxicity, renal dysfunction, and hepatic dysfunction) independently. Each cohort included new statin initiators and compared the relative hazard of the outcome. The interaction ratio (I*R) was the primary contrast of interest. The I*R represents the relative effect of each statin type (statin 3A4 substrate vs. statin non-3A4 substrate) with a CYP3A4 inhibitor, independent of the effect of the statin type without a CYP3A4 inhibitor. We adjusted for confounding variables using the multinomial propensity score. RESULTS: The median follow-up time per cohort was 1.5 years. There were 7889 muscle toxicity events among 362,809 patients and 792,665 person-years. The adjusted muscle toxicity I*R was 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.90-1.66). There were 1449 renal dysfunction events among 272,099 patients and 574,584 person-years. The adjusted renal dysfunction I*R was 0.91 (95%CI = 0.58-1.44). There were 1434 hepatic dysfunction events among 367,612 patients and 815,945 person-years. The adjusted hepatic dysfunction I*R was 0.78 (95%CI = 0.45-1.31). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study found no difference in the relative hazard of muscle toxicity, renal dysfunction, or hepatic dysfunction for patients prescribed a statin 3A4 substrate versus a statin non-3A4 substrate with CYP3A4 inhibitor concomitancy.

Effects of L-carnitine on dialysis-related hypotension and muscle cramps: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: L-Carnitine is an endogenous compound thought to be helpful in treating patients with dialysis-related hypotension and muscle cramps; however, sufficient evidence for these indications is lacking. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING & POPULATION: Adult patients with end-stage renal disease receiving long-term hemodialysis. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: All published English-language reports of randomized placebo-controlled trials of L-carnitine supplementation in adult long-term hemodialysis patients. INTERVENTION: Supplemental L-carnitine (or placebo) for at least 8 weeks. OUTCOME: Random-effects pooled odds ratio for intradialytic cramping or hypotension in L-carnitine-treated participants. RESULTS: Of 317 potentially relevant articles, 7 (total enrollment of 193 patients) met criteria for inclusion. Four articles reported results for both hypotension and cramps, 1 had results for only hypotension, and 2 reported results for only cramps. Using data from all 6 relevant trials, the pooled odds ratio for cramping after L-carnitine supplementation was 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 1.00; P = 0.05). Analysis of the 5 studies examining the response of intradialytic hypotension to l-carnitine supplementation yielded a pooled odds ratio of 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.04 to 2.23; P = 0.2). LIMITATIONS: The small number of available studies yielded limited statistical power. In addition, there was considerable interstudy heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Although suggestive in the case of muscle cramping, the available evidence does not confirm a beneficial effect of L-carnitine supplementation on dialysis-related muscle cramping or intradialytic hypotension. Additional study in the form of large rigorous randomized trials is needed in both cases.