Intravenous pyelogram artefacts unique to digital tomosynthesis reconstruction.

Recent advances in technology have led to the realisation of digital tomosynthesis (DT) imaging in routine investigations such as intravenous pyelogram (IVP). The major advantage this technology has over other technologies is its ability to perform a retrospective reconstruction of an arbitrary number of coronal image planes from a single data set consisting of a series of low dose discrete projections acquired over a limited angular range using a stationary detector. It is well documented that because DT relies on an angular limited acquisition, the data set is incomplete. This, in combination with the image reconstruction algorithm, results in reconstructed images containing non-focused information from outside the immediate focal plane. This article describes and suggests the cause of two artefacts unique to DT that cannot be explained by blurring alone. We believe the two artefacts are caused by breathing during data acquisition together with a combination of other factors, including the anatomy of the renal system, the method of data acquisition and the reconstructive algorithm used. This could lead to the unaware reporting radiologist falsely diagnosing a duplex collecting system. To avoid these artefacts, we recommend DT IVP should only be used in patients who can adequately perform a breath-hold for the duration of the data acquisition. In addition, we suggest that the study should be performed with breath-held following expiration.

Digital tomosynthesis--a new lease of life for the intravenous urogram?

OBJECTIVES: Digital tomosynthesis is a new digital technique based on conventional X-ray tomography. It acquires multiple low-dose projections during a single sweep of the X-ray tube, which are reassembled to provide high-resolution slices at different depths. Suggested uses include visualisation of pulmonary nodules, mammography, angiography, dental imaging and delineation of fractures. This study aims to evaluate its potential role as part of an intravenous urogram (IVU) by assessing the diagnostic quality in imaging the kidneys in clinical practice. METHODS: 100 renal units from consecutive traditional IVU studies were retrospectively compared with 101 renal units imaged using digital tomosynthesis. These were scored for visualisation of the renal outline and collecting system, presence of a renal cyst or mass and overall diagnostic quality. Radiation doses were calculated. RESULTS: 46.5% of traditional IVUs were found to be of diagnostic quality. The IVUs with digital tomosynthesis were of diagnostic quality in 95.5%. This represents a highly statistically significant difference (p<0.0001). There was also a statistically significant dose reduction, with a mean reduction of 56%, for the samples studied. CONCLUSION: Digital tomosynthesis offers a significant increase in the percentage of diagnostic quality tests for assessing renal pathology, compared with traditional IVU, and significantly reduces radiation. It also offers considerable advantages in ease and speed of imaging. For these reasons, in any situation where IVU is still being used to assess the kidneys, digital tomosynthesis is likely to be of considerable benefit in improving diagnostic quality.